NPR

Posted: **Sat Aug 05, 2023 8:48 am**

JM2K6 wrote: ↑Fri Aug 04, 2023 5:59 pm
Rhubarb & Custard wrote: ↑Fri Aug 04, 2023 4:59 pm
Ovals wrote: ↑Fri Aug 04, 2023 1:24 pm

This ^ And, he hasn't really played Lock for years.
Which doesn't obviate he doesn't really play as a loose forward. He plays like a lock at 6. You might want that, it's popular with many coaches around the world so hardly just fans, equally it's not hard to see why it's not what some would seek
He plays very much like a South African blindside. Relentless tackler and big hitter, lots of cleanout work, decent over the ball at the breakdown, heavy carrier. Excellent lineout option. More mobile than a big lock. Less mobile than an openside.

South African blindsides look like massive centres. Lawes looks like a basketball player.

Posted: **Sat Aug 05, 2023 9:20 am**

Kawazaki wrote: ↑Sat Aug 05, 2023 8:48 am
JM2K6 wrote: ↑Fri Aug 04, 2023 5:59 pm
Rhubarb & Custard wrote: ↑Fri Aug 04, 2023 4:59 pm

Which doesn't obviate he doesn't really play as a loose forward. He plays like a lock at 6. You might want that, it's popular with many coaches around the world so hardly just fans, equally it's not hard to see why it's not what some would seek
He plays very much like a South African blindside. Relentless tackler and big hitter, lots of cleanout work, decent over the ball at the breakdown, heavy carrier. Excellent lineout option. More mobile than a big lock. Less mobile than an openside.

South African blindsides look like massive centres. Lawes looks like a basketball player.

I hear basketball players can make for potentially world class blindsides...

Posted: **Sat Aug 05, 2023 9:26 am**

Kawazaki wrote: ↑Sat Aug 05, 2023 8:48 am
JM2K6 wrote: ↑Fri Aug 04, 2023 5:59 pm
Rhubarb & Custard wrote: ↑Fri Aug 04, 2023 4:59 pm

Which doesn't obviate he doesn't really play as a loose forward. He plays like a lock at 6. You might want that, it's popular with many coaches around the world so hardly just fans, equally it's not hard to see why it's not what some would seek
He plays very much like a South African blindside. Relentless tackler and big hitter, lots of cleanout work, decent over the ball at the breakdown, heavy carrier. Excellent lineout option. More mobile than a big lock. Less mobile than an openside.

South African blindsides look like massive centres. Lawes looks like a basketball player.

Which of course he was at school!
I heard that no matter what nutritional regime and calorie intake he was put on coupled with full on S and C programmes he was never able to bulk up sufficiently and fill out enough to fulfil the the "big" lock requirement!

Posted: **Sat Aug 05, 2023 9:31 am**

JM2K6 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 05, 2023 9:20 am
Kawazaki wrote: ↑Sat Aug 05, 2023 8:48 am
JM2K6 wrote: ↑Fri Aug 04, 2023 5:59 pm

He plays very much like a South African blindside. Relentless tackler and big hitter, lots of cleanout work, decent over the ball at the breakdown, heavy carrier. Excellent lineout option. More mobile than a big lock. Less mobile than an openside.

South African blindsides look like massive centres. Lawes looks like a basketball player.
I hear basketball players can make for potentially world class blindsides...

If they also look like massive centres then yes they can be.

Lawes is a pumped up skinny bloke. He'll weigh less than 100kgs within a few years of retirement from rugby.

Posted: **Sat Aug 05, 2023 9:49 am**

Personally I think Lawes became a better player when he switched to blindside on a permanent basis, he ditched lot of the tough guy act and was a much better rugby player for it, maybe he was acting up because he felt he was underpowered, I don't know, that possibility only just occurred to me as I was reading the thread. There was no real need for him to play lock as Itoje, Kruis and Launchbury were as good as you get.

World Class is a subjective term, for me it means someone who would definitely be in a world XXIII to play Mars - Kaino, Dusautoir, PS du Toit, O'Brien (who played more like a 6 than the 7 that was on his back), that sort of player.

Posted: **Sat Aug 05, 2023 10:10 am**

Tichtheid wrote: ↑Sat Aug 05, 2023 9:49 am Personally I think Lawes became a better player when he switched to blindside on a permanent basis, he ditched lot of the tough guy act and was a much better rugby player for it, maybe he was acting up because he felt he was underpowered, I don't know, that possibility only just occurred to me as I was reading the thread. There was no real need for him to play lock as Itoje, Kruis and Launchbury were as good as you get.

World Class is a subjective term, for me it means someone who would definitely be in a world XXIII to play Mars - Kaino, Dusautoir, PS du Toit, O'Brien (who played more like a 6 than the 7 that was on his back), that sort of player.

I've watched him since he was 18 and he's never been the "tough guy" enforcer type though never got pushed around. He's got better and better with age and maturity particularly when he stopped constantly looking for the big hit tackle every match.

Posted: **Sat Aug 05, 2023 10:16 am**

Lawes is a superb player but he's basically a taller version of Tom Croft with less pace.

Posted: **Sat Aug 05, 2023 10:16 am**

SaintK wrote: ↑Sat Aug 05, 2023 10:10 am
Tichtheid wrote: ↑Sat Aug 05, 2023 9:49 am Personally I think Lawes became a better player when he switched to blindside on a permanent basis, he ditched lot of the tough guy act and was a much better rugby player for it, maybe he was acting up because he felt he was underpowered, I don't know, that possibility only just occurred to me as I was reading the thread. There was no real need for him to play lock as Itoje, Kruis and Launchbury were as good as you get.

World Class is a subjective term, for me it means someone who would definitely be in a world XXIII to play Mars - Kaino, Dusautoir, PS du Toit, O'Brien (who played more like a 6 than the 7 that was on his back), that sort of player.
I've watched him since he was 18 and he's never been the "tough guy" enforcer type though never got pushed around. He's got better and better with age and maturity particularly when he stopped constantly looking for the big hit tackle every match.

Yeah, the big hit was what I was referring to, really.

Posted: **Sat Aug 05, 2023 10:29 am**

Kawazaki wrote: ↑Sat Aug 05, 2023 10:16 am Lawes is a superb player but he's basically a taller version of Tom Croft with less pace.

Croft was a freak!! Shame he was so prone to injury!

Posted: **Sat Aug 05, 2023 1:05 pm**

Kawazaki wrote: ↑Sat Aug 05, 2023 9:31 am
JM2K6 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 05, 2023 9:20 am
Kawazaki wrote: ↑Sat Aug 05, 2023 8:48 am

South African blindsides look like massive centres. Lawes looks like a basketball player.
I hear basketball players can make for potentially world class blindsides...

If they also look like massive centres then yes they can be.

Lawes is a pumped up skinny bloke. He'll weigh less than 100kgs within a few years of retirement from rugby.

I think he's naturally bigger than that but yes, he doesn't look like a classic 6. You wouldn't expect a man built like him to have the power he does, the accuracy and weight in the tackle, and the footwork when doing the heavy carrying. It works out though.

Posted: **Sat Aug 05, 2023 4:32 pm**

JM2K6 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 05, 2023 1:05 pm
Kawazaki wrote: ↑Sat Aug 05, 2023 9:31 am
JM2K6 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 05, 2023 9:20 am

I hear basketball players can make for potentially world class blindsides...

If they also look like massive centres then yes they can be.

Lawes is a pumped up skinny bloke. He'll weigh less than 100kgs within a few years of retirement from rugby.
I think he's naturally bigger than that but yes, he doesn't look like a classic 6. You wouldn't expect a man built like him to have the power he does, the accuracy and weight in the tackle, and the footwork when doing the heavy carrying. It works out though.

He's a great player who has had a great career - huge work ethic.

He's a great bench option really - not really starter material but often he's the best England have had. Mind you, while England continue to pick players like Ludlam then Lawes will always look good as a backrow option.

Posted: **Sat Aug 05, 2023 6:31 pm**

That was dogshit. We might be less dogshit with more of the regular starters back in, but there's little sign of a game plan still and that's the big worry.

Posted: **Sat Aug 05, 2023 6:35 pm**

Probably should have turned off earlier, but in the 79th minute, when we win a pen and we're 11 down, we need to quick tap immediately... No urgency, no care/awareness.

Posted: **Sat Aug 05, 2023 6:47 pm**

Too many players looked like they didn't know what they should be doing - that has to be down to the coaching / game plan.

Posted: **Sat Aug 05, 2023 7:09 pm**

I'm not that familiar with how the whole 57 old farts things works at he RFU, but this has been nagging me -who is responsible for appointing Bill Sweeney, and more importantly, who can get rid of him?

I can't see what he's done that's actually benefited the team (or, frankly, the game in England), and there's a lot that is negative.

I'll not comment much on the game, there was good pressure in the opening stages but constantly ruined by poor hands, but after that is was just bosh it up or kick.

On a positive Marchant continues to impress me - good job then that he's off to France next season.

Posted: **Sat Aug 05, 2023 7:12 pm**

Can we have Care back at Quins, please, because if England are just going to box kick the fucking ball all day we may as well get Wiggy out of retirement.

Posted: **Sat Aug 05, 2023 7:13 pm**

I mean, they were accurate kicks, so if we're going to do it...

...Maybe pick a winger who can actually fucking jump

Posted: **Sun Aug 06, 2023 6:50 am**

I said this during the 6N, but I have this sense that the England boys enjoy playing international rugby far less than other nations. No spark, a general lack of intensity and constant dim wittedness. Can’t expect anything at the WC

Posted: **Sun Aug 06, 2023 7:08 am**

Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 6:50 am I said this during the 6N, but I have this sense that the England boys enjoy playing international rugby far less than other nations. No spark, a general lack of intensity and constant dim wittedness. Can’t expect anything at the WC

That was no secret under Eddie's regime but why would that be the case under Borthwick?

Posted: **Sun Aug 06, 2023 8:39 am**

Torquemada 1420 wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 7:08 am
Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 6:50 am I said this during the 6N, but I have this sense that the England boys enjoy playing international rugby far less than other nations. No spark, a general lack of intensity and constant dim wittedness. Can’t expect anything at the WC
That was no secret under Eddie's regime but why would that be the case under Borthwick?

Kick and chase plus one out crash ball is fucking boring

Posted: **Sun Aug 06, 2023 1:41 pm**

Shared with me from a usually reliable source...lets call him Jake....the squad as will be announced tomrorow

No Tom Willis
No Dombrandt
No Henry Slade

Forwards E Genge, J Marler, B Rodd, J George, J Walker, T Dan, K Sinckler, D Cole, W Stuart, M Itoje, O Chessum, G Martin, D Ribbans, C Lawes, L Ludlam, T Curry, J Willis, B Earl, B Vunipola.

Backs B Youngs, D Care, J van Poortvliet, O Farrell, G Ford, M Smith, M Tuilagi, O Lawrence, J Marchant, A Watson, E Daly, M Malins, H Arundell, F Steward

Posted: **Sun Aug 06, 2023 2:20 pm**

Raggs wrote: ↑Sat Aug 05, 2023 6:35 pm Probably should have turned off earlier, but in the 79th minute, when we win a pen and we're 11 down, we need to quick tap immediately... No urgency, no care/awareness.

Christ, yes, I didn't even bother to shout at the telly, I just accepted it like Liam Neeson accepts his death in Batman Begins.

Posted: **Sun Aug 06, 2023 2:50 pm**

ASMO wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 1:41 pm Shared with me from a usually reliable source...lets call him Jake....the squad as will be announced tomrorow

No Tom Willis
No Dombrandt
No Henry Slade

Forwards E Genge, J Marler, B Rodd, J George, J Walker, T Dan, K Sinckler, D Cole, W Stuart, M Itoje, O Chessum, G Martin, D Ribbans, C Lawes, L Ludlam, T Curry, J Willis, B Earl, B Vunipola.

Backs B Youngs, D Care, J van Poortvliet, O Farrell, G Ford, M Smith, M Tuilagi, O Lawrence, J Marchant, A Watson, E Daly, M Malins, H Arundell, F Steward

Best XV from that squad;

1. Genge
2. George
3. Stuart
4. Itoje
5. Ribbans
6. Willis
7. Curry
8. Vunipola
9. Traffic Cone
10. Ford
11. Daly
12. Farrell
13. Marchant
14. Watson
15. Steward

Posted: **Sun Aug 06, 2023 3:06 pm**

Think I'd prefer Chessum over Ribbans, but it's fairly tight. The back row leaves us very short in the lineout and I think you have to shoehorn one of Lawes or Ludlam in there, sadly.

Daly is lucky to be there but if that's the list of potential wings then it's a shocker of a situation for England to be in - a gamble on Watson still being up to it, Daly being picked on past glorious and some performances at 13, Malins always a livewire but off the back of a pretty dreadful showing at the weekend, a hugely impressive kid with very little experience, and a centre who can cover wing. So much time wasted on Cokanasiga while one of the best try scorers in the league for the past few seasons kicks his heels without a chance coming his way. Fark.

I suppose it would be no surprise if Watson/Daly/Malins/Arundell are the primary wing pool, given they've all played fullback and we want to kick the shit out of it. Marchant's great in the air too.

I hope the rumour is wrong because it gives us a really weird squad:

- 3 hookers, one of whom is top class, one is a big body who is probably just club class with a few international caps, one of whom has a single cap where he absolutely shit the bed in dramatic fashion
- 3 tightheads, one of whom is a million years old, one of whom has gone badly downhill since he left his first club, and the other is injury prone
- George Martin overtaking a few players on the back of being a Leicester Tiger who tries really, really hard but as we saw at the weekend, not always to any actual effect
- A back row selection with one actual number 8 who is coming back from injury (something he usually really struggles to do) with a really ropy record at world cups, a lot of players who've made their names as opensides, and a couple who'll do a job at 6
- 3 scrum halves, 2 of which are a thousand years old and it should've been one or the other plus someone like Mitchell
- The wing situation above
- One 12 who plays completely differently to all the other options
- Tuilagi and his endless fitness drama

(admittedly if Jack Willis has to play 8 it'll probably be fine)

You can parse a few good 10/12/13 combos there. All 3 flyhalves can line up with variations that would suit them. But it's all meaningless as we just want to run into things and boot the ball in the air.

Posted: **Sun Aug 06, 2023 4:29 pm**

JM2K6 wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 3:06 pm Think I'd prefer Chessum over Ribbans, but it's fairly tight. The back row leaves us very short in the lineout and I think you have to shoehorn one of Lawes or Ludlam in there, sadly.

Daly is lucky to be there but if that's the list of potential wings then it's a shocker of a situation for England to be in - a gamble on Watson still being up to it, Daly being picked on past glorious and some performances at 13, Malins always a livewire but off the back of a pretty dreadful showing at the weekend, a hugely impressive kid with very little experience, and a centre who can cover wing. So much time wasted on Cokanasiga while one of the best try scorers in the league for the past few seasons kicks his heels without a chance coming his way. Fark.

I suppose it would be no surprise if Watson/Daly/Malins/Arundell are the primary wing pool, given they've all played fullback and we want to kick the shit out of it. Marchant's great in the air too.

I hope the rumour is wrong because it gives us a really weird squad:

- 3 hookers, one of whom is top class, one is a big body who is probably just club class with a few international caps, one of whom has a single cap where he absolutely shit the bed in dramatic fashion
- 3 tightheads, one of whom is a million years old, one of whom has gone badly downhill since he left his first club, and the other is injury prone
- George Martin overtaking a few players on the back of being a Leicester Tiger who tries really, really hard but as we saw at the weekend, not always to any actual effect
- A back row selection with one actual number 8 who is coming back from injury (something he usually really struggles to do) with a really ropy record at world cups, a lot of players who've made their names as opensides, and a couple who'll do a job at 6
- 3 scrum halves, 2 of which are a thousand years old and it should've been one or the other plus someone like Mitchell
- The wing situation above
- One 12 who plays completely differently to all the other options
- Tuilagi and his endless fitness drama

(admittedly if Jack Willis has to play 8 it'll probably be fine)

You can parse a few good 10/12/13 combos there. All 3 flyhalves can line up with variations that would suit them. But it's all meaningless as we just want to run into things and boot the ball in the air.

Agree with most of that - but I suspect Ludlam or Curry will be more likely to play 8 than Jack Willis. Which would be fine as long as we don't expect them to keep battering into heavy trafic but use them to provide faster ruck ball and slow down oppo ball. Lawes/Curry/Ludlam and Willis are all decent carriers, in the right circumstances - but not just 'truckin it up'.

TBH - I've pretty much written off this WC cycle and had done so long before they canned the poisoned dwarf. Hope we'll see a bit of a clear out and a fresh approach starting next year.

Posted: **Sun Aug 06, 2023 4:42 pm**

Kawazaki wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 2:50 pm
ASMO wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 1:41 pm Shared with me from a usually reliable source...lets call him Jake....the squad as will be announced tomrorow

No Tom Willis
No Dombrandt
No Henry Slade

Forwards E Genge, J Marler, B Rodd, J George, J Walker, T Dan, K Sinckler, D Cole, W Stuart, M Itoje, O Chessum, G Martin, D Ribbans, C Lawes, L Ludlam, T Curry, J Willis, B Earl, B Vunipola.

Backs B Youngs, D Care, J van Poortvliet, O Farrell, G Ford, M Smith, M Tuilagi, O Lawrence, J Marchant, A Watson, E Daly, M Malins, H Arundell, F Steward

Best XV from that squad;

1. Genge
2. George
3. Stuart
4. Itoje
5. Ribbans
6. Willis
7. Curry
8. Vunipola
9. Dried dog turd
10. Ford
11. Daly
12. Farrell
13. Marchant
14. Watson
15. Arundell

Slightly amended, will give it far more attacking threat

Posted: **Sun Aug 06, 2023 4:45 pm**

Ovals wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 4:29 pm Agree with most of that - but I suspect Ludlam or Curry will be more likely to play 8 than Jack Willis. Which would be fine as long as we don't expect them to keep battering into heavy trafic but use them to provide faster ruck ball and slow down oppo ball. Lawes/Curry/Ludlam and Willis are all decent carriers, in the right circumstances - but not just 'truckin it up'.

TBH - I've pretty much written off this WC cycle and had done so long before they canned the poisoned dwarf. Hope we'll see a bit of a clear out and a fresh approach starting next year.

Jack Willis is a good heavy carrier.

Posted: **Sun Aug 06, 2023 5:02 pm**

Forwards look fair enough apart from Martin, no idea what he's done to be included. Have thought for ages that first choice back row is lawes and Willis with curry at 8. Out of necessity rather than choice. First choice front row is ok (genge George Stewart), after that no the best. Backs...other than Lwarnce and steward; sheesh

Posted: **Sun Aug 06, 2023 6:17 pm**

JM2K6 wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 4:45 pm
Ovals wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 4:29 pm Agree with most of that - but I suspect Ludlam or Curry will be more likely to play 8 than Jack Willis. Which would be fine as long as we don't expect them to keep battering into heavy trafic but use them to provide faster ruck ball and slow down oppo ball. Lawes/Curry/Ludlam and Willis are all decent carriers, in the right circumstances - but not just 'truckin it up'.

TBH - I've pretty much written off this WC cycle and had done so long before they canned the poisoned dwarf. Hope we'll see a bit of a clear out and a fresh approach starting next year.
Jack Willis is a good heavy carrier.

And will have substantially more games at 8 under his belt than Curry. Curry at 8 is something we should only be repeating in extremis, the pack have enough problems without adding to them.

Posted: **Sun Aug 06, 2023 6:18 pm**

Best XV from that squad;

1. Genge
2. George
3. Stuart
4. Itoje
5. Ribbans
6. Willis
7. Curry
8. Vunipola
9. Piotr Kosewicz
10. Ford
11. Daly
12. Farrell
13. Marchant
14. Watson
15. Arundell

Amended again to improve passing from the base.

Posted: **Sun Aug 06, 2023 8:25 pm**

sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 6:17 pm
JM2K6 wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 4:45 pm
Ovals wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 4:29 pm Agree with most of that - but I suspect Ludlam or Curry will be more likely to play 8 than Jack Willis. Which would be fine as long as we don't expect them to keep battering into heavy trafic but use them to provide faster ruck ball and slow down oppo ball. Lawes/Curry/Ludlam and Willis are all decent carriers, in the right circumstances - but not just 'truckin it up'.

TBH - I've pretty much written off this WC cycle and had done so long before they canned the poisoned dwarf. Hope we'll see a bit of a clear out and a fresh approach starting next year.
Jack Willis is a good heavy carrier.
And will have substantially more games at 8 under his belt than Curry. Curry at 8 is something we should only be repeating in extremis, the pack have enough problems without adding to them.

Really ?? He's only played there a handful of times.

Posted: **Sun Aug 06, 2023 8:26 pm**

Ovals wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 8:25 pm
sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 6:17 pm
JM2K6 wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 4:45 pm

Jack Willis is a good heavy carrier.
And will have substantially more games at 8 under his belt than Curry. Curry at 8 is something we should only be repeating in extremis, the pack have enough problems without adding to them.
Really ?? He's only played there a handful of times.

He's had a fair few games there for wasps.

Posted: **Sun Aug 06, 2023 9:04 pm**

Ovals wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 8:25 pm
sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 6:17 pm
JM2K6 wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 4:45 pm

Jack Willis is a good heavy carrier.
And will have substantially more games at 8 under his belt than Curry. Curry at 8 is something we should only be repeating in extremis, the pack have enough problems without adding to them.
Really ?? He's only played there a handful of times.

Even if it were only a handful he'd still be ahead of Curry when it comes to experience at 8, but it was definitelyu more than that.

Posted: **Sun Aug 06, 2023 9:26 pm**

Absolute best case with that squad?

- easy enough wins over Japan and Samoa who can’t cope up front
- squeeze out Argentina by exploiting poor discipline and kicking giga amounts of penalties
- squeeze out runner up from the other pool if it’s Oz/Wales, overwhelm them if it’s Fiji/Georgia
- one off burst of intensity a la Dublin except we convert a try scoring opportunity/they get a red/panic
- lose by 20 in the final.

Posted: **Sun Aug 06, 2023 10:02 pm**

sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 9:04 pm
Ovals wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 8:25 pm
sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 6:17 pm

And will have substantially more games at 8 under his belt than Curry. Curry at 8 is something we should only be repeating in extremis, the pack have enough problems without adding to them.
Really ?? He's only played there a handful of times.
Even if it were only a handful he'd still be ahead of Curry when it comes to experience at 8, but it was definitelyu more than that.

Occupied positions by Jack on start team :

Back Row : 70 times ( Openside Flanker 51%, Blindside Flanker 43%, Number 8 6% )

Posted: **Sun Aug 06, 2023 10:39 pm**

Ovals wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 10:02 pm
sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 9:04 pm
Ovals wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 8:25 pm

Really ?? He's only played there a handful of times.
Even if it were only a handful he'd still be ahead of Curry when it comes to experience at 8, but it was definitelyu more than that.

Occupied positions by Jack on start team :

Back Row : 70 times ( Openside Flanker 51%, Blindside Flanker 43%, Number 8 6% )

He came off the bench to play 8 a fair few times in one particular season.

Posted: **Sun Aug 06, 2023 11:05 pm**

And also had some games where he switched to 8 having started in a different position.

We're getting a bit away from the main point, though, which was not to say that Willis is some vastly experienced frontline 8 option, just that if any of our back rowers need to fill in there he's got more experience in that position than Curry. Which speaks more to how rarely Curry's performed that role than how often Willis has.

Posted: **Mon Aug 07, 2023 9:32 am**

Squad confirmed, we're half an hour on and look how excited we all are!

England squad

Forwards:

Ollie Chessum (Leicester), Dan Cole (Leicester), Tom Curry (Sale), Theo Dan (Saracens), Ben Earl (Saracens), Ellis Genge (Bristol), Jamie George (Saracens), Maro Itoje (Saracens), Courtney Lawes (Northampton), Lewis Ludlam (Northampton), Joe Marler (Harlequins), George Martin (Leicester), David Ribbans (Toulon), Bevan Rodd (Sale), Kyle Sinckler (Bristol), Will Stuart (Bath), Billy Vunipola (Saracens), Jack Walker (Harlequins), Jack Willis (Toulouse)

Backs:

Henry Arundell (Racing 92), Danny Care (Harlequins), Elliot Daly (Saracens), Owen Farrell (Saracens), George Ford (Sale), Ollie Lawrence (Bath), Max Malins (Bristol), Joe Marchant (Stade Francais), Marcus Smith (Harlequins), Freddie Steward (Leicester), Manu Tuilagi (Sale), Jack van Poortvliet (Leicester), Anthony Watson (unattached), Ben Youngs (Leicester)

Posted: **Mon Aug 07, 2023 9:36 am**

Gets worse the more you look at it

Posted: **Mon Aug 07, 2023 9:42 am**

Hal Jordan wrote: ↑Mon Aug 07, 2023 9:32 am Squad confirmed, we're half an hour on and look how excited we all are!

England squad

Forwards:

Ollie Chessum (Leicester), Dan Cole (Leicester), Tom Curry (Sale), Theo Dan (Saracens), Ben Earl (Saracens), Ellis Genge (Bristol), Jamie George (Saracens), Maro Itoje (Saracens), Courtney Lawes (Northampton), Lewis Ludlam (Northampton), Joe Marler (Harlequins), George Martin (Leicester), David Ribbans (Toulon), Bevan Rodd (Sale), Kyle Sinckler (Bristol), Will Stuart (Bath), Billy Vunipola (Saracens), Jack Walker (Harlequins), Jack Willis (Toulouse)

Backs:

Henry Arundell (Racing 92), Danny Care (Harlequins), Elliot Daly (Saracens), Owen Farrell (Saracens), George Ford (Sale), Ollie Lawrence (Bath), Max Malins (Bristol), Joe Marchant (Stade Francais), Marcus Smith (Harlequins), Freddie Steward (Leicester), Manu Tuilagi (Sale), Jack van Poortvliet (Leicester), Anthony Watson (unattached), Ben Youngs (Leicester)

Looks pretty much as discussed/predicted - the Wales game was a last chance saloon for a number of players, so given poor performance there's not many revelations.

Still no idea what our midfield is going to look like. Merchant has been a bright spot in terms of running rugby so a well deserved spot in front of Slade, and Lawrence has put in some very tidy performances prior to injury, but I'm sure Tuilagi will be shovelled in there somewhere, as will Farrell if Smith is at 10.

Hypothesising about the England midfield. Plus ça change.

NPR

The Official English Rugby Thread

Re: The Official English Rugby Thread

Re: The Official English Rugby Thread

Re: The Official English Rugby Thread

Re: The Official English Rugby Thread

Re: The Official English Rugby Thread

Re: The Official English Rugby Thread

Re: The Official English Rugby Thread

Re: The Official English Rugby Thread

Re: The Official English Rugby Thread

Re: The Official English Rugby Thread

Re: The Official English Rugby Thread

Re: The Official English Rugby Thread

Re: The Official English Rugby Thread

Re: The Official English Rugby Thread

Re: The Official English Rugby Thread

Re: The Official English Rugby Thread

Re: The Official English Rugby Thread

Re: The Official English Rugby Thread

Re: The Official English Rugby Thread

Re: The Official English Rugby Thread

Re: The Official English Rugby Thread

Re: The Official English Rugby Thread

Re: The Official English Rugby Thread

Re: The Official English Rugby Thread

Re: The Official English Rugby Thread

Re: The Official English Rugby Thread

Re: The Official English Rugby Thread

Re: The Official English Rugby Thread

Re: The Official English Rugby Thread

Re: The Official English Rugby Thread

Re: The Official English Rugby Thread

Re: The Official English Rugby Thread

Re: The Official English Rugby Thread

Re: The Official English Rugby Thread

Re: The Official English Rugby Thread

Re: The Official English Rugby Thread

Re: The Official English Rugby Thread

Re: The Official English Rugby Thread

Re: The Official English Rugby Thread

Re: The Official English Rugby Thread