Re: Stop voting for fucking Tories
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2023 9:18 am
oops, I made the mistake of not looking at the source, I thought it was an actual journalist who was talking there, but it's Douglas Murray ffs.
Slick wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 8:53 amShe definitely is trying to get sacked.SaintK wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 8:47 amWould be interested to know just who is pulling her strings. She appears too thick to be doing this of her own accord!C69 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 7:14 am So just hours after Rishi met the Head of the Met and some common ground was found.
Guess who has an interview and claims left wing protests and causes are treated more favourable than those by right wing groups.
Go girl
Is she actually trying to get sacked? She is certainly starting her thrust for leadership early.
Then mad Nad on the Beeb spouting conspiracy theories.
Brilliant
And agree Saint, someone is planning this with her. Although I read yesterday that she only has the support of about 40 MP's. Also, seems a bit of a strange time to be doing this, the Torys are going to get whacked at the GE so why not wait until after that - most evidence so far seems to point to the fact that Rishi going more right wing and appealing to specific groups isn't really working anyway so who thinks going full tonto is going to work?
They will still get smashed thoughTichtheid wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 9:21 amSlick wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 8:53 amShe definitely is trying to get sacked.
And agree Saint, someone is planning this with her. Although I read yesterday that she only has the support of about 40 MP's. Also, seems a bit of a strange time to be doing this, the Torys are going to get whacked at the GE so why not wait until after that - most evidence so far seems to point to the fact that Rishi going more right wing and appealing to specific groups isn't really working anyway so who thinks going full tonto is going to work?
As to the timing of this, perhaps she knows something that we don't - an early GE next May?
“Right-wing and nationalist protesters who engage in aggression are rightly met with a stern response yet pro-Palestinian mobs displaying almost identical behaviour are largely ignored, even when clearly breaking the law? I have spoken to serving and former police officers who have noted this double standard. Football fans are even more vocal about the tough way they are policed as compared to politically connected minority groups favoured by the left. It may be that senior officers are more concerned with how much flak they are likely to get than whether this perceived unfairness alienates the majority. The government has a duty to take a broader view.”
Tichtheid wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 9:05 am
A banal equivalent to that argument would be that if some Rangers supporters are sectarian bigots who have run guns into Northern Ireland for loyalist paramilitary terrorists you should never go to a match at Ibrox.
I know someone who was convicted of that offence, or rather I know his sibling.
The answer is of course that Rangers do not belong to the extremists, likewise protests calling for peace and a ceasefire do not belong to extremists
I genuinely hope this is intended as a joke. But I fear it’s only slightly a joke, and that you’re serious - you refuse to listen to those you disagree with.
I think it's more a reluctance to consider the writings of certain people to be authoritative, sincere and honest representations.
In the context, it was someone making a point. It was a very salient point, and didn’t rely on statistics. So to start stomping around like a child with fingers in ears seemed inappropriate.inactionman wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 9:38 amI think it's more a reluctance to consider the writings of certain people to be authoritative, sincere and honest representations.
Agreeing with someone isn't the same as trusting them or valuing their opinion.
Ymx wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 9:27 amTichtheid wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 9:05 am
A banal equivalent to that argument would be that if some Rangers supporters are sectarian bigots who have run guns into Northern Ireland for loyalist paramilitary terrorists you should never go to a match at Ibrox.
I know someone who was convicted of that offence, or rather I know his sibling.
The answer is of course that Rangers do not belong to the extremists, likewise protests calling for peace and a ceasefire do not belong to extremists
Ymx wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 9:43 amIn the context, it was someone making a point. It was a very salient point, and didn’t rely on statistics. So to start stomping around like a child with fingers in ears seemed inappropriate.inactionman wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 9:38 amI think it's more a reluctance to consider the writings of certain people to be authoritative, sincere and honest representations.
Agreeing with someone isn't the same as trusting them or valuing their opinion.
This is true of all political movements - you can’t win elections without appealing to/getting the votes of cranks. The difference is the type of crank we’re willing to tolerateTichtheid wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 9:57 amYmx wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 9:27 amTichtheid wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 9:05 am
A banal equivalent to that argument would be that if some Rangers supporters are sectarian bigots who have run guns into Northern Ireland for loyalist paramilitary terrorists you should never go to a match at Ibrox.
I know someone who was convicted of that offence, or rather I know his sibling.
The answer is of course that Rangers do not belong to the extremists, likewise protests calling for peace and a ceasefire do not belong to extremists
Leaping straight to the jar of internet cliches is the quick and easy rebuttal and means you don't have to engage with the proposition. "Strawman" is a favourite of some.
This is not a straw man argument, it is a comparison and I stand by it, not all groups are defined by a subsection of that group. As was said before by someone else, the Brexiteers were happy with, or turned a blind eye to having some racists in their midsts, that does not mean that everyone who voted for Brexit was a racist.
So George, John and Ringo?
Whoever it is that's funding the Tories and advising them to go ever further right clearly wants her somewhere high up in the next iteration of the Tory party (presumably because she's a malleable moron).Slick wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 8:53 amShe definitely is trying to get sacked.SaintK wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 8:47 amWould be interested to know just who is pulling her strings. She appears too thick to be doing this of her own accord!C69 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 7:14 am So just hours after Rishi met the Head of the Met and some common ground was found.
Guess who has an interview and claims left wing protests and causes are treated more favourable than those by right wing groups.
Go girl
Is she actually trying to get sacked? She is certainly starting her thrust for leadership early.
Then mad Nad on the Beeb spouting conspiracy theories.
Brilliant
And agree Saint, someone is planning this with her. Although I read yesterday that she only has the support of about 40 MP's. Also, seems a bit of a strange time to be doing this, the Torys are going to get whacked at the GE so why not wait until after that - most evidence so far seems to point to the fact that Rishi going more right wing and appealing to specific groups isn't really working anyway so who thinks going full tonto is going to work?
I reckon it'll take more than 1 term for the Tories to find enough "decent" MPs to replace the current crop of scum and improve their image in the eyes of the voters. They'll get back into power again, but not before 2014.sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 11:02 am
Some right wingers are hoping that a one term government of Labour trying and failing to fix the mess the Tories will be leaving behind will be enough for the electorate to forget who made the mess in the first place and vote them back in.That would be gambling on the idea that people are just fed up of an extended period of Tory rule and the sleaze of the Johnson era rather than being fundamentally bothered by or simply uninterested in the culture war focus while the public purse is looted and services crumble.
Hopefully, but the UK electorate have delivered a lot of disappointment over the last several years.Sandstorm wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 11:07 amI reckon it'll take more than 1 term for the Tories to find enough "decent" MPs to replace the current crop of scum and improve their image in the eyes of the voters. They'll get back into power again, but not before 2014.sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 11:02 am
Some right wingers are hoping that a one term government of Labour trying and failing to fix the mess the Tories will be leaving behind will be enough for the electorate to forget who made the mess in the first place and vote them back in.That would be gambling on the idea that people are just fed up of an extended period of Tory rule and the sleaze of the Johnson era rather than being fundamentally bothered by or simply uninterested in the culture war focus while the public purse is looted and services crumble.
Sadly yessockwithaticket wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 11:29 amHopefully, but the UK electorate have delivered a lot of disappointment over the last several years.Sandstorm wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 11:07 amI reckon it'll take more than 1 term for the Tories to find enough "decent" MPs to replace the current crop of scum and improve their image in the eyes of the voters. They'll get back into power again, but not before 2014.sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 11:02 am
Some right wingers are hoping that a one term government of Labour trying and failing to fix the mess the Tories will be leaving behind will be enough for the electorate to forget who made the mess in the first place and vote them back in.That would be gambling on the idea that people are just fed up of an extended period of Tory rule and the sleaze of the Johnson era rather than being fundamentally bothered by or simply uninterested in the culture war focus while the public purse is looted and services crumble.
What about Tory 2019 voters who considered her a piece of shit pre-Home Secretary role & haven't changed their opinion?
a +10 rating amongst Tory voters is hardly a ringing endorsement for the vile piece of shit and probably still puts her much lower than other possible contenders to replace Sunak. I'd bet Johnson's popularity amongst the Tories faithful morons is comfortably ahead of any other Conservative politician.
These marches are very specific in topic. They are about tensions between Palestine and Israel, where there is strong hate in display. It’s not unrelated topics like Brexit and racism. The issue is they are inciting hate speech on the topic they are marching for. A more appropriate equivalent would be those marching in theme with racial equality, and some were wearing kkk helmets.Tichtheid wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 9:57 amYmx wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 9:27 amTichtheid wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 9:05 am
A banal equivalent to that argument would be that if some Rangers supporters are sectarian bigots who have run guns into Northern Ireland for loyalist paramilitary terrorists you should never go to a match at Ibrox.
I know someone who was convicted of that offence, or rather I know his sibling.
The answer is of course that Rangers do not belong to the extremists, likewise protests calling for peace and a ceasefire do not belong to extremists
Leaping straight to the jar of internet cliches is the quick and easy rebuttal and means you don't have to engage with the proposition. "Strawman" is a favourite of some.
This is not a straw man argument, it is a comparison and I stand by it, not all groups are defined by a subsection of that group. As was said before by someone else, the Brexiteers were happy with, or turned a blind eye to having some racists in their midsts, that does not mean that everyone who voted for Brexit was a racist.
The cynic in me thinks that if the government had come out against Israel quite a lot of these protestors would come out in support of Israel. People want to protest against our government but there isn't really unifying cause because there are too many things to protest about. Was it "just flood everything with shit"? Netanyahu being a right wing populist probably increases the number of protestors.Ymx wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 12:28 pmThese marches are very specific in topic. They are about tensions between Palestine and Israel, where there is strong hate in display. It’s not unrelated topics like Brexit and racism. The issue is they are inciting hate speech on the topic they are marching for. A more appropriate equivalent would be those marching in theme with racial equality, and some were wearing kkk helmets.Tichtheid wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 9:57 am
Leaping straight to the jar of internet cliches is the quick and easy rebuttal and means you don't have to engage with the proposition. "Strawman" is a favourite of some.
This is not a straw man argument, it is a comparison and I stand by it, not all groups are defined by a subsection of that group. As was said before by someone else, the Brexiteers were happy with, or turned a blind eye to having some racists in their midsts, that does not mean that everyone who voted for Brexit was a racist.
These marches are attracting an increasing level of nasty genocidal hate. Police are not even arresting those calling for Jihad or river to the sea.
There have already been several of these marches. They have not been banned outright. A postponement would be extremely sensible, let alone appropriate policing of them.
Suella is absolutely spot on.
Agreed, so then the question becomes, Why now ?Slick wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 8:53 amShe definitely is trying to get sacked.SaintK wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 8:47 amWould be interested to know just who is pulling her strings. She appears too thick to be doing this of her own accord!C69 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 7:14 am So just hours after Rishi met the Head of the Met and some common ground was found.
Guess who has an interview and claims left wing protests and causes are treated more favourable than those by right wing groups.
Go girl
Is she actually trying to get sacked? She is certainly starting her thrust for leadership early.
Then mad Nad on the Beeb spouting conspiracy theories.
Brilliant
And agree Saint, someone is planning this with her. Although I read yesterday that she only has the support of about 40 MP's. Also, seems a bit of a strange time to be doing this, the Torys are going to get whacked at the GE so why not wait until after that - most evidence so far seems to point to the fact that Rishi going more right wing and appealing to specific groups isn't really working anyway so who thinks going full tonto is going to work?
Ymx wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 12:28 pmThese marches are very specific in topic. They are about tensions between Palestine and Israel, where there is strong hate in display. It’s not unrelated topics like Brexit and racism. The issue is they are inciting hate speech on the topic they are marching for. A more appropriate equivalent would be those marching in theme with racial equality, and some were wearing kkk helmets.Tichtheid wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 9:57 am
Leaping straight to the jar of internet cliches is the quick and easy rebuttal and means you don't have to engage with the proposition. "Strawman" is a favourite of some.
This is not a straw man argument, it is a comparison and I stand by it, not all groups are defined by a subsection of that group. As was said before by someone else, the Brexiteers were happy with, or turned a blind eye to having some racists in their midsts, that does not mean that everyone who voted for Brexit was a racist.
These marches are attracting an increasing level of nasty genocidal hate. Police are not even arresting those calling for Jihad or river to the sea.
There have already been several of these marches. They have not been banned outright. A postponement would be extremely sensible, let alone appropriate policing of them.
Suella is absolutely spot on.
The ministerial code says all major interviews and media appearances, both print and broadcast, should "be agreed with the No 10 Press Office".
The prime minister can punish a minister who is deemed to have breached the code. Options can range from demanding a public apology to sacking them.
It’s a genuinely terrible day to do it. There have already been bad interactions between those wearing/selling Poppie’s and the Palestinian flag wavers.C69 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 2:15 pm If we accept that the point of the protests is to call for a cease fire then surely the best day for this to happen is Armistice Day.
You argue about some of the intentions of fringe lunatics at the protests but Armistice Day is actually the perfect Day.
Going by the dictionary definition.
I think that's broadly right, though in this instance the story will tend to be they're marching on Armistice Day and what the response is, so it'll be a process story about events not a substance story about what they're protesting about. And really a lot of people will just think bollocks to them for it, sure they're probably reasoning the extra publicity on balance makes it worthwhile but they could have gone 1 day later and had the story be about Israeli actions in Gaza, although even then we only get back to nobody has a good idea about what to do about Israeli actions in GazaTichtheid wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 1:54 pm
I was engaging with the point you were promoting by posting that video, the specific point being that you (one) should not attend a demo or march if some of those who march alongside you are spouting hate speech.
I don't think you as group of marchers take on responsibility for, or promote the values of the extremists if they join you on a march for peace.
Although his argument is a good way silence any protest right enough.
Are you capable of finding sources that aren't weirdo climate change sceptic/anti-vax/culture war baiting mongs? It feels like whenever I try and get a sense of the provenance of any twitter posts you put up here and have a scroll that's all I see.
Do you know what an armistice is?Ymx wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 2:34 pmIt’s a genuinely terrible day to do it. There have already been bad interactions between those wearing/selling Poppie’s and the Palestinian flag wavers.C69 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 2:15 pm If we accept that the point of the protests is to call for a cease fire then surely the best day for this to happen is Armistice Day.
You argue about some of the intentions of fringe lunatics at the protests but Armistice Day is actually the perfect Day.
Going by the dictionary definition.
This is not the great collaboration you think it is. Armistice is not just diluted by this but actually directly threatened by this.
Obviously let’s see, as the pandering met fail to manage it.
Of course you will say, blah blah blah … just fringe lunatics on both sides.
But quite clearly they will not be complimentary side by side protests. Hence why the cenotaph is now going to be shut off to the public.
Well the Cenotaph is being made inaccessible from public, so here’s hoping that prevents it.sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 3:22 pmAre you capable of finding sources that aren't weirdo climate change sceptic/anti-vax/culture war baiting mongs? It feels like whenever I try and get a sense of the provenance of any twitter posts you put up here and have a scroll that's all I see.
Defacing cenotaphs is very, very poor form, but two teens have been arrested for that. While two marches may well clash I don't see the vandalism of teenagers as being particularly strong evidence in favour of the prediction.
Who are you suggesting they are scared of in this case?Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Thu Nov 09, 2023 3:10 pm Saturday is going to be an absolute fucking disaster, one that has been a generation in the making. Braverman is only interested in making things worse but it is true the police are incredibly guilty of double standards depending on whether they are scared of the protestors and their political backing or not.