Re: The Official English Rugby Thread
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2021 8:04 pm
Umaga bottled that a bit. Don't want to sound like I'm picking on him but eh
Fun match so far
Fun match so far
A place where escape goats go to play
https://notplanetrugby.com/
Nah, copped a hit on the arm maybe...sockwithaticket wrote: Fri Jan 08, 2021 8:05 pm My stram quality's not great, but was that not a knock on in the tackle on Willis? Flight of the ball looked like it.
Edit - what a response!
They do need to be on the ball.Raggs wrote: Fri Jan 08, 2021 8:13 pm Monye, if it's squeeze ball position they don't need to be on the ball, that was what was said. The fact he dragged him 3m and the tackled player didn't release is the problem. The pen was given against whoever it was that took out the 9.
Not with the squeeze ball position, it's impossible to get on the ball in those circumstances, if they drag the player, like Willis did, the player has to release the ball.JM2K6 wrote: Fri Jan 08, 2021 8:25 pmThey do need to be on the ball.Raggs wrote: Fri Jan 08, 2021 8:13 pm Monye, if it's squeeze ball position they don't need to be on the ball, that was what was said. The fact he dragged him 3m and the tackled player didn't release is the problem. The pen was given against whoever it was that took out the 9.
West's arse is miles higher than his shoulders, which is not helping him at allRaggs wrote: Fri Jan 08, 2021 8:25 pm Think Carley is just giving these scrums to even them out. Stuart clearly on the arm, repeatedly, including the time he whistled it in Stuarts favour.
Stuart is on his arm, he's getting pulled to the ground in that position and there's nothing he can do.JM2K6 wrote: Fri Jan 08, 2021 8:27 pmWest's arse is miles higher than his shoulders, which is not helping him at allRaggs wrote: Fri Jan 08, 2021 8:25 pm Think Carley is just giving these scrums to even them out. Stuart clearly on the arm, repeatedly, including the time he whistled it in Stuarts favour.
No, see my edit. The bind on the last one was actually chest.Raggs wrote: Fri Jan 08, 2021 8:27 pmStuart is on his arm, he's getting pulled to the ground in that position and there's nothing he can do.JM2K6 wrote: Fri Jan 08, 2021 8:27 pmWest's arse is miles higher than his shoulders, which is not helping him at allRaggs wrote: Fri Jan 08, 2021 8:25 pm Think Carley is just giving these scrums to even them out. Stuart clearly on the arm, repeatedly, including the time he whistled it in Stuarts favour.
Going to disagree, also having seen the replay.
I don't want you thinking the ref is screwing you. I'm happy to upload a video. The hand is binding on the chest, not the arm.Raggs wrote: Fri Jan 08, 2021 8:30 pmGoing to disagree, also having seen the replay.
Missed the collapse of the maul. Then this is the second time they've offended, and just killed the ball regardless.
I don't think he's screwing us, I just think he's got that wrong. You can be holding the shirt that came from the chest, and still be on the arm. Personally I think the first scrum he gave against Bath could have more easily gone their way, or been reset. He's being as bad at the breakdown for both sides (though it effects us more I feel, but that's not him being against us). We've got lucky with him missing knock ons, and not giving an offside penalty against Willis from one of the box kicks. We're getting stuff as well as losing it. I'm just less likely to be frustrated enough to actually type something, when we're on the better side of a decision.JM2K6 wrote: Fri Jan 08, 2021 8:32 pmI don't want you thinking the ref is screwing you. I'm happy to upload a video. The hand is binding on the chest, not the arm.Raggs wrote: Fri Jan 08, 2021 8:30 pmGoing to disagree, also having seen the replay.
Missed the collapse of the maul. Then this is the second time they've offended, and just killed the ball regardless.
No. The law is about binding on the arm. If you're binding on the chest, you're fine. West's problems are a) he's allowed Stuart to get a tight bind around and under him, and b) his hips are too high.Raggs wrote: Fri Jan 08, 2021 8:37 pmI don't think he's screwing us, I just think he's got that wrong. You can be holding the shirt that came from the chest, and still be on the arm. Personally I think the first scrum he gave against Bath could have more easily gone their way, or been reset. He's being as bad at the breakdown for both sides (though it effects us more I feel, but that's not him being against us). We've got lucky with him missing knock ons, and not giving an offside penalty against Willis from one of the box kicks. We're getting stuff as well as losing it. I'm just less likely to be frustrated enough to actually type something, when we're on the better side of a decision.JM2K6 wrote: Fri Jan 08, 2021 8:32 pmI don't want you thinking the ref is screwing you. I'm happy to upload a video. The hand is binding on the chest, not the arm.Raggs wrote: Fri Jan 08, 2021 8:30 pm
Going to disagree, also having seen the replay.
Missed the collapse of the maul. Then this is the second time they've offended, and just killed the ball regardless.
Yeah, but if you grab the shirt, then bring your hand (and the shirt) onto the top of the arm (basically in the armpit, or just below), it's classed as binding on the arm. You're supposed to keep your hand off their arm, you can get away with it on the shoulder, but perfectly you want a long bind and keep your arm basically outstretched, the problem is, it's not as powerful a position, and it means you struggle to control their arms as much. By bringing in a tighter bind, you can also force their elbow down, and almost twist them in, quite often buying yourself a penalty as a lot of refs will see the looseheads elbow pointing down, and assume his twisting in or pulling it to ground, when in truth it's the tighthead forcing his arm down due to the very short bind.JM2K6 wrote: Fri Jan 08, 2021 8:42 pmNo. The law is about binding on the arm. If you're binding on the chest, you're fine. West's problems are a) he's allowed Stuart to get a tight bind around and under him, and b) his hips are too high.Raggs wrote: Fri Jan 08, 2021 8:37 pmI don't think he's screwing us, I just think he's got that wrong. You can be holding the shirt that came from the chest, and still be on the arm. Personally I think the first scrum he gave against Bath could have more easily gone their way, or been reset. He's being as bad at the breakdown for both sides (though it effects us more I feel, but that's not him being against us). We've got lucky with him missing knock ons, and not giving an offside penalty against Willis from one of the box kicks. We're getting stuff as well as losing it. I'm just less likely to be frustrated enough to actually type something, when we're on the better side of a decision.JM2K6 wrote: Fri Jan 08, 2021 8:32 pm
I don't want you thinking the ref is screwing you. I'm happy to upload a video. The hand is binding on the chest, not the arm.
You may well be right about the other scrums, I only looked at this one in detail, but his arse height was a big issue on at least one other scrum and that's a basic problem.
It's kind of an odd game so far - it's reasonably open and quite exciting, but both sides have made life easy in defence at times!
a) It's not classed as binding on the arm if you're bound on the chest, which is what Stuart is doing. He is not binding on the armpit or the shoulder. His hand is not on the arm. I will upload the video once google stops being a dick!Raggs wrote: Fri Jan 08, 2021 8:46 pmYeah, but if you grab the shirt, then bring your hand (and the shirt) onto the top of the arm (basically in the armpit, or just below), it's classed as binding on the arm. You're supposed to keep your hand off their arm, you can get away with it on the shoulder, but perfectly you want a long bind and keep your arm basically outstretched, the problem is, it's not as powerful a position, and it means you struggle to control their arms as much. By bringing in a tighter bind, you can also force their elbow down, and almost twist them in, quite often buying yourself a penalty as a lot of refs will see the looseheads elbow pointing down, and assume his twisting in or pulling it to ground, when in truth it's the tighthead forcing his arm down due to the very short bind.JM2K6 wrote: Fri Jan 08, 2021 8:42 pmNo. The law is about binding on the arm. If you're binding on the chest, you're fine. West's problems are a) he's allowed Stuart to get a tight bind around and under him, and b) his hips are too high.Raggs wrote: Fri Jan 08, 2021 8:37 pm
I don't think he's screwing us, I just think he's got that wrong. You can be holding the shirt that came from the chest, and still be on the arm. Personally I think the first scrum he gave against Bath could have more easily gone their way, or been reset. He's being as bad at the breakdown for both sides (though it effects us more I feel, but that's not him being against us). We've got lucky with him missing knock ons, and not giving an offside penalty against Willis from one of the box kicks. We're getting stuff as well as losing it. I'm just less likely to be frustrated enough to actually type something, when we're on the better side of a decision.
You may well be right about the other scrums, I only looked at this one in detail, but his arse height was a big issue on at least one other scrum and that's a basic problem.
It's kind of an odd game so far - it's reasonably open and quite exciting, but both sides have made life easy in defence at times!
Running through an Underhill arm tackle shows his power, jeezsockwithaticket wrote: Fri Jan 08, 2021 8:56 pmOdogwu is coming into serious form.
Looks like whoever can actually manage a kick off will take the game at the moment.
Aye, still plenty of life in the old man yet.
They're always ecnouraged to bite off as much as possible, it means a few go dead, but a fair few more end up scoreable. I'll settle for it.sockwithaticket wrote: Fri Jan 08, 2021 9:05 pm Odogwu now with a turnover. His chonk and centre of gravity must make him hard to shift in that position.
Poor missed kick to touch from Umaga.
Don't see the need to go for broke with the field position we were already in and all this pressure has stemmed from the resultant scrum.Raggs wrote: Fri Jan 08, 2021 9:06 pmThey're always ecnouraged to bite off as much as possible, it means a few go dead, but a fair few more end up scoreable. I'll settle for it.sockwithaticket wrote: Fri Jan 08, 2021 9:05 pm Odogwu now with a turnover. His chonk and centre of gravity must make him hard to shift in that position.
Poor missed kick to touch from Umaga.
The difference is being able to maul it over or not. Personally I think we should have gone for 3.sockwithaticket wrote: Fri Jan 08, 2021 9:12 pmDon't see the need to go for broke with the field position we were already in and all this pressure has stemmed from the resultant scrum.Raggs wrote: Fri Jan 08, 2021 9:06 pmThey're always ecnouraged to bite off as much as possible, it means a few go dead, but a fair few more end up scoreable. I'll settle for it.sockwithaticket wrote: Fri Jan 08, 2021 9:05 pm Odogwu now with a turnover. His chonk and centre of gravity must make him hard to shift in that position.
Poor missed kick to touch from Umaga.