Re: The Official Scottish Rugby Thread
Posted: Sun Mar 14, 2021 11:18 pm
Dobbie and Thompson era starts on Saturday.
A place where escape goats go to play
https://notplanetrugby.com/
For all the despair about Scotland just not being good enough etc. I think it would have been an entirely different result if the lineout had been functioning. Maybe Townsend doesn't rate Cherry because he's 'only' a solid pro, but if he had been on the pitch having a bang average game but hitting his jumpers the difference in territory and possession would have been massive.Big D wrote: ↑Sun Mar 14, 2021 10:25 pmWhen a facet of play is debilitating to the extent it was then you need to take action before it costs you. We won 2 of 8 line outs and one of those was a really shabby effort.
There is a difference from hooking a player "only" because he's having a shocker to hooking him when his poor play is having a devastating impact to the whole team game plan.
Nice thought, but I can’t see it happening. There’s a chance Thompson might make the bench, but Jaco VdW will be in to start and I suspect Toony will rely on Hogg or Lang for cover at 10.
Selection too.
Italy have been as bad as I've ever seen them in this tournament. Buuuuuuut a disheartened Scotland team with loads of key injuries and suspensions (hookers, starting and bench props, second rows, 10s, Redpath who is looking even better in his absence). If we don't win by 20 judging by what everyone else has done to Italy it's not good enough. But I might be watching the game from behind a sofa...Yr Alban wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 8:11 amNice thought, but I can’t see it happening. There’s a chance Thompson might make the bench, but Jaco VdW will be in to start and I suspect Toony will rely on Hogg or Lang for cover at 10.
Price will keep his spot, partly because there will be a less experienced 10 playing, but mainly because Toony is stubborn. Given that it’s Italy, giving Steele a start might not be a bad plan, although Italy will doubtless have saved up their one good performance for this game, as they usually do, but I can’t see a new 9 coming in at this stage.
I'd start Thompson on Saturday. He's looked to the manor born so far in his Glasgow appearances, Redpathesque one could say. Keep Price at 9, he's a good scrum half with experience which will be needed. Jones at 13. Skinner at lock definitely.I like neeps wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 8:16 amItaly have been as bad as I've ever seen them in this tournament. Buuuuuuut a disheartened Scotland team with loads of key injuries and suspensions (hookers, starting and bench props, second rows, 10s, Redpath who is looking even better in his absence). If we don't win by 20 judging by what everyone else has done to Italy it's not good enough. But I might be watching the game from behind a sofa...Yr Alban wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 8:11 amNice thought, but I can’t see it happening. There’s a chance Thompson might make the bench, but Jaco VdW will be in to start and I suspect Toony will rely on Hogg or Lang for cover at 10.
Price will keep his spot, partly because there will be a less experienced 10 playing, but mainly because Toony is stubborn. Given that it’s Italy, giving Steele a start might not be a bad plan, although Italy will doubtless have saved up their one good performance for this game, as they usually do, but I can’t see a new 9 coming in at this stage.
I think you have to play Dobie in this one. Maybe not from the start as the 10 will be VdW who is atrocious. Also I was very wrong on Thompson thought watching the 20s he wouldn't be good enough for club rugby but I can't see him being good enough at international level. I think Chamberlain is the future.
Hogg is brilliant at loads of things, but is passing the ball one of them? Not something he needs to do that much as a 15. And the majority will be short passes during a backs move rather than longer distributing passes that a 10 has to give again and again.Big D wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 8:39 am I think there is every chance they play Hogg at 10 and Jones into the starting XV. To be honest I think I'd be ok with that.
Price is either so incredibly thick or just panics in the last few minutes. Kicking the ball away, not even a chip like Hogg which was daft too, but actually kicking it away two matches in a row is just dense.
I am not saying it is ideal but realistically it is him, Lang or VdW and I know which I'd rather see.clydecloggie wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 9:15 amHogg is brilliant at loads of things, but is passing the ball one of them? Not something he needs to do that much as a 15. And the majority will be short passes during a backs move rather than longer distributing passes that a 10 has to give again and again.Big D wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 8:39 am I think there is every chance they play Hogg at 10 and Jones into the starting XV. To be honest I think I'd be ok with that.
Price is either so incredibly thick or just panics in the last few minutes. Kicking the ball away, not even a chip like Hogg which was daft too, but actually kicking it away two matches in a row is just dense.
On reflection I might be coming round to this... I don't think I'm quite ready to ditch Townsend yet but I accept that might be an emotional response.I like neeps wrote: ↑Sun Mar 14, 2021 4:23 pmWouldn't have to put up with this piss if he did.
Yes I think we all knew it was coming. The disappointment was how poor and sloppy we were for me.Slick wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 9:27 amOn reflection I might be coming round to this... I don't think I'm quite ready to ditch Townsend yet but I accept that might be an emotional response.
Thinking it over last night and this morning it struck me that I have started to accept that we are going to lose tight games. My wife actually came to check on me yesterday as I wasn't making my usual noise and all she had heard all match was a laugh. Even when we drew level I didn't get out of my seat, first reaction was "you know whats coming". And it did, although a little sooner than I was expecting.
We do seem to be quite unlucky with injuries and that affects us more than other teams but there is a bit missing and it has been missing for too long now, winning those tight games. I guess it is progress of a sort that we are making these games so close now that we would have lost by 10-15 points in years gone by, but again, it has stalled. Maybe we just have too many players that know they will not get dropped.
We need a bit of a fear factor and for all the good that Toony brings I don't get the impression that is there at all. You have a few players like Hogg, Watson, Ritchie, that will run through walls to win but maybe not enough of the others have that.
So, maybe we do need a Gatland like figure. What we also need is a player that the rest of the players are terrified of, a Martin Johnson, AWJ, Paul O'Connel. When was the last time we really had that sort of player, early 90's?
I do wonder whether GT is a bit "harder" behind closed doors than he seems, but I can't see a Gatland type standing for some of the mind numbing BS we see regularly. It will feel like I am picking on Price but he is the example front of mind:Slick wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 9:27 amOn reflection I might be coming round to this... I don't think I'm quite ready to ditch Townsend yet but I accept that might be an emotional response.
Thinking it over last night and this morning it struck me that I have started to accept that we are going to lose tight games. My wife actually came to check on me yesterday as I wasn't making my usual noise and all she had heard all match was a laugh. Even when we drew level I didn't get out of my seat, first reaction was "you know whats coming". And it did, although a little sooner than I was expecting.
We do seem to be quite unlucky with injuries and that affects us more than other teams but there is a bit missing and it has been missing for too long now, winning those tight games. I guess it is progress of a sort that we are making these games so close now that we would have lost by 10-15 points in years gone by, but again, it has stalled. Maybe we just have too many players that know they will not get dropped.
We need a bit of a fear factor and for all the good that Toony brings I don't get the impression that is there at all. You have a few players like Hogg, Watson, Ritchie, that will run through walls to win but maybe not enough of the others have that.
So, maybe we do need a Gatland like figure. What we also need is a player that the rest of the players are terrified of, a Martin Johnson, AWJ, Paul O'Connel. When was the last time we really had that sort of player, early 90's?
Turning this lot of serial underachievers in to a consistently good side would surely be the ideal challenge for a guy like him.I like neeps wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 10:46 amYes I think we all knew it was coming. The disappointment was how poor and sloppy we were for me.Slick wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 9:27 amOn reflection I might be coming round to this... I don't think I'm quite ready to ditch Townsend yet but I accept that might be an emotional response.
Thinking it over last night and this morning it struck me that I have started to accept that we are going to lose tight games. My wife actually came to check on me yesterday as I wasn't making my usual noise and all she had heard all match was a laugh. Even when we drew level I didn't get out of my seat, first reaction was "you know whats coming". And it did, although a little sooner than I was expecting.
We do seem to be quite unlucky with injuries and that affects us more than other teams but there is a bit missing and it has been missing for too long now, winning those tight games. I guess it is progress of a sort that we are making these games so close now that we would have lost by 10-15 points in years gone by, but again, it has stalled. Maybe we just have too many players that know they will not get dropped.
We need a bit of a fear factor and for all the good that Toony brings I don't get the impression that is there at all. You have a few players like Hogg, Watson, Ritchie, that will run through walls to win but maybe not enough of the others have that.
So, maybe we do need a Gatland like figure. What we also need is a player that the rest of the players are terrified of, a Martin Johnson, AWJ, Paul O'Connel. When was the last time we really had that sort of player, early 90's?
The question I ask myself is do we continue to make the same mistakes, continue the mental fragility and continue the illdiscipline if Gatland is in charge?
I don't think we do.
I think that's because Exeter tap and go from the 5 and score basically everytime so Hogg favours that to a scrum.Slick wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 12:49 pm It’s also worth saying that although the line out was a horror show we also conceded 14 turnovers, the majority of them on the ground, that’s bloody rubbish.
I can’t remember a game where I got a feeling of dread every time we went into contact.
When we were hammering away at their line in the 2nd half I couldn’t understand why we weren’t taking the scrum option instead of a tap and allowing them to fan out. Every time we got the ball off a set piece we were getting through them in the backs. Seemed a bit daft although I appreciate scrums can be a bit of a lottery
Agree with all of that.NorfolkScot wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 10:53 am Saturday was gutting, after the first 10 minutes there only looked like being 1 winner & we did well to battle our way back into the match but, we give away far too many points from the kick off & this is something that's happened time and time again. Combined with a woeful lineout & there was only ever going to be 1 winner on Saturday.
The injuries ought to force Toonie's hand - Skinner has to start against Italy and I don't see how he can avoid calling up both Dobie and Thompson. Even assuming VDW is fit, to train with only one recognised 10 in the squad is crazy. I think in an ideal world, Thompson would get another year or so to bed himself in as first choice at Glasgow but, we're in a break glass in case of emergency situation - he's been playing out of his skin and VDW is average and hasn't been playing. Even if he doesn't start, he should be on the bench. Dobie has also done more than enough to earn his chance - even against Italy I'd be wary about having both on the pitch at the same time so, I'd start one & bench the other. Townsend clearly doesn't trust Steele so why waste a bench spot on a 27 year old rather than an extremely promising 19 year old? Far better to give him the experience - same goes for Cherry, a solid 30 year old who isn't going to get any better, why not take a punt on Ashman?
We're down to 4th/5th choice at both 2 and 10, and, with Horne out, it's probably between Steele and Dobie for 3rd/4th choice, in all cases, I'd far rather see us take a punt on promising youngsters
Agree with all of this. The line-out and inability to keep hold of what little ball we did get were the main factors in the total shitshow.Slick wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 12:49 pm It’s also worth saying that although the line out was a horror show we also conceded 14 turnovers, the majority of them on the ground, that’s bloody rubbish.
I can’t remember a game where I got a feeling of dread every time we went into contact.
When we were hammering away at their line in the 2nd half I couldn’t understand why we weren’t taking the scrum option instead of a tap and allowing them to fan out. Every time we got the ball off a set piece we were getting through them in the backs. Seemed a bit daft although I appreciate scrums can be a bit of a lottery
Wouldn't think Hoyland would take that jersey off Jones.I like neeps wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 1:26 pm
If Russell failed his HIA I'd have assumed he would've been dropped as you can't have a 6 day turnaround.
Hoyland is the interesting one. He doesn't really play wing for Edinburgh anymore he's a 15. So are we thinking Hogg 10 Maitland 15 Hoyland 23?
Here’s the thing. A few years back we were truly hopeless. Every game was full of basic errors, errors that the players just weren’t making on club duty. Many people (I was one) were saying that we needed a hard-as-nails taskmaster who would put the fear of God into the players and crack down on the sloppiness. And then we got one. We even waited an awful year to get him in. And it worked. The players available were the same as before, but we began to iron out the sloppiness and become harder to beat. And then we got rid of him, in order to appoint a guy with no pedigree at Test level, because the SRU were afraid he would go somewhere else.Slick wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 9:27 amOn reflection I might be coming round to this... I don't think I'm quite ready to ditch Townsend yet but I accept that might be an emotional response.
Thinking it over last night and this morning it struck me that I have started to accept that we are going to lose tight games. My wife actually came to check on me yesterday as I wasn't making my usual noise and all she had heard all match was a laugh. Even when we drew level I didn't get out of my seat, first reaction was "you know whats coming". And it did, although a little sooner than I was expecting.
We do seem to be quite unlucky with injuries and that affects us more than other teams but there is a bit missing and it has been missing for too long now, winning those tight games. I guess it is progress of a sort that we are making these games so close now that we would have lost by 10-15 points in years gone by, but again, it has stalled. Maybe we just have too many players that know they will not get dropped.
We need a bit of a fear factor and for all the good that Toony brings I don't get the impression that is there at all. You have a few players like Hogg, Watson, Ritchie, that will run through walls to win but maybe not enough of the others have that.
So, maybe we do need a Gatland like figure. What we also need is a player that the rest of the players are terrified of, a Martin Johnson, AWJ, Paul O'Connel. When was the last time we really had that sort of player, early 90's?
The only logical conclusion here is that this squad is for Italy and France, and that Zander will be eligible for the second game?clydecloggie wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 1:35 pm Zander? Did both the Ireland game and Ospreys game played this weekend count towards his suspension?
I'm assuming Jones starts at 13.Big D wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 1:36 pmWouldn't think Hoyland would take that jersey off Jones.I like neeps wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 1:26 pm
If Russell failed his HIA I'd have assumed he would've been dropped as you can't have a 6 day turnaround.
Hoyland is the interesting one. He doesn't really play wing for Edinburgh anymore he's a 15. So are we thinking Hogg 10 Maitland 15 Hoyland 23?
Wait, are we surprised that an international coach isn't going to be picking a fly half - either one - who's had a handful of senior starts? Glasgow didn't even give Thompson the whole game against Zebre the other week.
No, not surprised. But in my endless wisdom as an established international rugby coach rather than webchat keyboard warrior, I'd definitely take Thompson over Jaco for the Italy game.
clydecloggie wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 2:03 pmNo, not surprised. But in my endless wisdom as an established international rugby coach rather than webchat keyboard warrior, I'd definitely take Thompson over Jaco for the Italy game.
Looks like it will be Russell anyway.
VDW will be fit won't he?I like neeps wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 1:26 pm
If Russell failed his HIA I'd have assumed he would've been dropped as you can't have a 6 day turnaround.
Hoyland is the interesting one. He doesn't really play wing for Edinburgh anymore he's a 15. So are we thinking Hogg 10 Maitland 15 Hoyland 23?
I presume so but it just seems odd to drop McLean who is playing well and has bags of potential for Hoyland a fullback who is playing okay and doesn't. Only logic could be they're needing a third fullback which suggests Hogg to 10.Jock42 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 4:08 pmVDW will be fit won't he?I like neeps wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 1:26 pm
If Russell failed his HIA I'd have assumed he would've been dropped as you can't have a 6 day turnaround.
Hoyland is the interesting one. He doesn't really play wing for Edinburgh anymore he's a 15. So are we thinking Hogg 10 Maitland 15 Hoyland 23?
Then Harris has the 23 shirt. Although Harris will be in the 13 shirt.I like neeps wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 1:50 pmI'm assuming Jones starts at 13.Big D wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 1:36 pmWouldn't think Hoyland would take that jersey off Jones.I like neeps wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 1:26 pm
If Russell failed his HIA I'd have assumed he would've been dropped as you can't have a 6 day turnaround.
Hoyland is the interesting one. He doesn't really play wing for Edinburgh anymore he's a 15. So are we thinking Hogg 10 Maitland 15 Hoyland 23?
Jones was 22 Vs Ireland with Graham 23. It seems unlikely that Hogg is picked as the only 10 so maybe Lang 22 with Harris back to Gloucester.
Harris will be starting. Unless there has been something said by the coaches in a presser. Harris is thought of much better inside rugby than Scotland fans give him credit for.I like neeps wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 4:49 pmJones was 22 Vs Ireland with Graham 23. It seems unlikely that Hogg is picked as the only 10 so maybe Lang 22 with Harris back to Gloucester.
Or probably Jaco does start but Hoyland in the squad doesn't make much sense!
Maybe, I'm a Harris fan but Jones made Scotland competitive. I think Vs Italy you go with the form attacker.Big D wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 7:42 pmHarris will be starting. Unless there has been something said by the coaches in a presser. Harris is thought of much better inside rugby than Scotland fans give him credit for.I like neeps wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 4:49 pmJones was 22 Vs Ireland with Graham 23. It seems unlikely that Hogg is picked as the only 10 so maybe Lang 22 with Harris back to Gloucester.
Or probably Jaco does start but Hoyland in the squad doesn't make much sense!
With Russell seemingly fit, or at least in the squad, we may see the same bench arrangement as last week.
If you pooled all of Wales rugby resources into 2 professional teams then we'd do much better at club level.Tattie wrote: ↑Sun Mar 14, 2021 10:20 pm100% agree. Even in recent years when Glasgow we’re flying and regularly spanking the Welsh sides, as soon as those same players put on their respective international jerseys, for some unknown reason the Welsh upper their game and the Scots... well. Has to be coaching - physical and mental.Yr Alban wrote: ↑Sun Mar 14, 2021 9:17 pmThis is what I think. What I can’t understand is this: Wales have pro teams who are generally as mediocre as ours, and underperform at European level too. Yet they are a game away from a GS and we are nowhere. If this isn’t down to coaching, what is it?Blackmac wrote: ↑Sun Mar 14, 2021 7:47 pm
I think mentality is the issue. When I look at Ireland and Wales I generally see players who are not that much more capable than us. But I do see lads that are hard as nails who you would want with you in the trenches.
By contrast, Scotland, with the exception of Watson and Hogg look like rear echelon gym bunnies who look the part but don't have the grit for the front line nastiness.
Sure they would, but that isn’t really the point. The point is that Welsh players manage to transcend their iffy club form at international level, and Scots players don’t.Butterfingers wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 8:32 pmIf you pooled all of Wales rugby resources into 2 professional teams then we'd do much better at club level.Tattie wrote: ↑Sun Mar 14, 2021 10:20 pm100% agree. Even in recent years when Glasgow we’re flying and regularly spanking the Welsh sides, as soon as those same players put on their respective international jerseys, for some unknown reason the Welsh upper their game and the Scots... well. Has to be coaching - physical and mental.
It would obviously not be a good thing for the national side though.