Re: The one and only UK 2024 election thread - July 4
Posted: Sat Jun 08, 2024 9:33 pm
A place where escape goats go to play
https://notplanetrugby.com/
I’m not sure about the French thing, that was more like another damage limitation exercise that also backfiredfishfoodie wrote: ↑Sat Jun 08, 2024 9:20 pm All these high price, & supposedly High IQ advisors, & none of them suggested that maybe he could stay in France, & the ITV Interviewer could do the interview there, with an ITV camera crew already there, & he could do the manifesto review on the flight back later ?
I mean how.fucking.hard is it ?
There was a conscious decision to snub the French & Germans, for a potential fraction of a percentage gain with the frothing loons.
The point about the King is well made too; the poor bar steward is suffering thru chemo etc, & still working full days, & the pint sized prick can't work till lunch.
It's hard to know it was the original intent, or just something thrown into the non-apology apology, but the emphasis on how he attended the "British" commemorations looked particularly shit.Slick wrote: ↑Sat Jun 08, 2024 9:34 pmI’m not sure about the French thing, that was more like another damage limitation exercise that also backfiredfishfoodie wrote: ↑Sat Jun 08, 2024 9:20 pm All these high price, & supposedly High IQ advisors, & none of them suggested that maybe he could stay in France, & the ITV Interviewer could do the interview there, with an ITV camera crew already there, & he could do the manifesto review on the flight back later ?
I mean how.fucking.hard is it ?
There was a conscious decision to snub the French & Germans, for a potential fraction of a percentage gain with the frothing loons.
The point about the King is well made too; the poor bar steward is suffering thru chemo etc, & still working full days, & the pint sized prick can't work till lunch.
Oh yeah, totally agree. Just don’t think it was pre plannedfishfoodie wrote: ↑Sat Jun 08, 2024 9:40 pmIt's hard to know it was the original intent, or just something thrown into the non-apology apology, but the emphasis on how he attended the "British" commemorations looked particularly shit.Slick wrote: ↑Sat Jun 08, 2024 9:34 pmI’m not sure about the French thing, that was more like another damage limitation exercise that also backfiredfishfoodie wrote: ↑Sat Jun 08, 2024 9:20 pm All these high price, & supposedly High IQ advisors, & none of them suggested that maybe he could stay in France, & the ITV Interviewer could do the interview there, with an ITV camera crew already there, & he could do the manifesto review on the flight back later ?
I mean how.fucking.hard is it ?
There was a conscious decision to snub the French & Germans, for a potential fraction of a percentage gain with the frothing loons.
The point about the King is well made too; the poor bar steward is suffering thru chemo etc, & still working full days, & the pint sized prick can't work till lunch.
It's like trying to get an insight inside the mind of a 5 year on acid, which is particularly bizarre, when the Tories have always been the most scrupulous in their coordination at election time, & they've always had that discipline, & you could tell the workers to push cannibalism, or whatever as policy, & they'd just line up & do it.Slick wrote: ↑Sat Jun 08, 2024 10:18 pmOh yeah, totally agree. Just don’t think it was pre plannedfishfoodie wrote: ↑Sat Jun 08, 2024 9:40 pmIt's hard to know it was the original intent, or just something thrown into the non-apology apology, but the emphasis on how he attended the "British" commemorations looked particularly shit.
That would be utter madness. They wouldn't be able to have a leadership contest. The only person who could replace him is Cameron, who is carrying a lot of negatives himself.
The rest of the article is hilarious. They are calling the ITV leaders debate a win because of the pack of lies he came out with about the Labour numbers from the treasury._Os_ wrote: ↑Sat Jun 08, 2024 9:07 pm The Times is on a free weekend, this article is worth reading:
https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/ar ... -6rlvt8nr6
To me in reads like Sunak was mostly to blame and there were advisors telling him to do the whole thing. One advisor was a literal former PM, why get a former PM onboard to tell you how to be a PM, then ignore his advice? Answer: So rich he thinks he's the expert on everything.
The prime minister seemed markedly better prepared than Starmer as he sought to pin on Labour the claim that a black hole in their finances would cost every household £2,000.
The more I read about this the angrier the entitled spunk trumpet makes me._Os_ wrote: ↑Sat Jun 08, 2024 9:07 pm The Times is on a free weekend, this article is worth reading:
https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/ar ... -6rlvt8nr6
To me in reads like Sunak was mostly to blame and there were advisors telling him to do the whole thing. One advisor was a literal former PM, why get a former PM onboard to tell you how to be a PM, then ignore his advice? Answer: So rich he thinks he's the expert on everything.
So that's what he was working on yesterday, to try and make up for the D-Day commemoration debacleBegbie wrote: ↑Sun Jun 09, 2024 8:33 am https://x.com/RishiSunak/status/1799697 ... ZF4TQ&s=19
He's gone full Truss.
I don’t think he intended to snub anyone. Fundamentally he is a transatlantic man for whom a nation is a tax domicile. He doesn’t have an emotional connection to D Day or any other aspect of history, and didn’t grasp the significance as a result.fishfoodie wrote: ↑Sat Jun 08, 2024 9:20 pm All these high price, & supposedly High IQ advisors, & none of them suggested that maybe he could stay in France, & the ITV Interviewer could do the interview there, with an ITV camera crew already there, & he could do the manifesto review on the flight back later ?
I mean how.fucking.hard is it ?
There was a conscious decision to snub the French & Germans, for a potential fraction of a percentage gain with the frothing loons.
The point about the King is well made too; the poor bar steward is suffering thru chemo etc, & still working full days, & the pint sized prick can't work till lunch.
You don't need an emotional grasp to realise the significance of the event. It's about respect, not just of the fallen or the veterans, but of neighbours and allies who have invited you to take part.Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Sun Jun 09, 2024 9:36 amI don’t think he intended to snub anyone. Fundamentally he is a transatlantic man for whom a nation is a tax domicile. He doesn’t have an emotional connection to D Day or any other aspect of history, and didn’t grasp the significance as a result.fishfoodie wrote: ↑Sat Jun 08, 2024 9:20 pm All these high price, & supposedly High IQ advisors, & none of them suggested that maybe he could stay in France, & the ITV Interviewer could do the interview there, with an ITV camera crew already there, & he could do the manifesto review on the flight back later ?
I mean how.fucking.hard is it ?
There was a conscious decision to snub the French & Germans, for a potential fraction of a percentage gain with the frothing loons.
The point about the King is well made too; the poor bar steward is suffering thru chemo etc, & still working full days, & the pint sized prick can't work till lunch.
I totally agree and I am personally furious at what he did. I’m attempting to explain why he did it - because it’s so stupid it defies any other explanation IMOJock42 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 09, 2024 9:40 amYou don't need an emotional grasp to realise the significance of the event. It's about respect, not just of the fallen or the veterans, but of neighbours and allies who have invited you to take part.Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Sun Jun 09, 2024 9:36 amI don’t think he intended to snub anyone. Fundamentally he is a transatlantic man for whom a nation is a tax domicile. He doesn’t have an emotional connection to D Day or any other aspect of history, and didn’t grasp the significance as a result.fishfoodie wrote: ↑Sat Jun 08, 2024 9:20 pm All these high price, & supposedly High IQ advisors, & none of them suggested that maybe he could stay in France, & the ITV Interviewer could do the interview there, with an ITV camera crew already there, & he could do the manifesto review on the flight back later ?
I mean how.fucking.hard is it ?
There was a conscious decision to snub the French & Germans, for a potential fraction of a percentage gain with the frothing loons.
The point about the King is well made too; the poor bar steward is suffering thru chemo etc, & still working full days, & the pint sized prick can't work till lunch.
He did it because he's an entitled, out of touch twat, surrounded by idiot advisors who really don't understand the "real world"Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Sun Jun 09, 2024 9:43 amI totally agree and I am personally furious at what he did. I’m attempting to explain why he did it - because it’s so stupid it defies any other explanation IMOJock42 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 09, 2024 9:40 amYou don't need an emotional grasp to realise the significance of the event. It's about respect, not just of the fallen or the veterans, but of neighbours and allies who have invited you to take part.Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Sun Jun 09, 2024 9:36 am
I don’t think he intended to snub anyone. Fundamentally he is a transatlantic man for whom a nation is a tax domicile. He doesn’t have an emotional connection to D Day or any other aspect of history, and didn’t grasp the significance as a result.
It's not just him. He's surrounded by this new breed of Tory that is anti-institution and against British norms and values (or can't distinguish between these and the liberal values they hate).Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Sun Jun 09, 2024 9:36 amI don’t think he intended to snub anyone. Fundamentally he is a transatlantic man for whom a nation is a tax domicile. He doesn’t have an emotional connection to D Day or any other aspect of history, and didn’t grasp the significance as a result.fishfoodie wrote: ↑Sat Jun 08, 2024 9:20 pm All these high price, & supposedly High IQ advisors, & none of them suggested that maybe he could stay in France, & the ITV Interviewer could do the interview there, with an ITV camera crew already there, & he could do the manifesto review on the flight back later ?
I mean how.fucking.hard is it ?
There was a conscious decision to snub the French & Germans, for a potential fraction of a percentage gain with the frothing loons.
The point about the King is well made too; the poor bar steward is suffering thru chemo etc, & still working full days, & the pint sized prick can't work till lunch.
To be fair, even though he's a buffoon I couldn't see BoJo making such a crass mistake. Does seem to have evolved over the last couple of yearsrobmatic wrote: ↑Sun Jun 09, 2024 10:20 amIt's not just him. He's surrounded by this new breed of Tory that is anti-institution and against British norms and values (or can't distinguish between these and the liberal values they hate).Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Sun Jun 09, 2024 9:36 amI don’t think he intended to snub anyone. Fundamentally he is a transatlantic man for whom a nation is a tax domicile. He doesn’t have an emotional connection to D Day or any other aspect of history, and didn’t grasp the significance as a result.fishfoodie wrote: ↑Sat Jun 08, 2024 9:20 pm All these high price, & supposedly High IQ advisors, & none of them suggested that maybe he could stay in France, & the ITV Interviewer could do the interview there, with an ITV camera crew already there, & he could do the manifesto review on the flight back later ?
I mean how.fucking.hard is it ?
There was a conscious decision to snub the French & Germans, for a potential fraction of a percentage gain with the frothing loons.
The point about the King is well made too; the poor bar steward is suffering thru chemo etc, & still working full days, & the pint sized prick can't work till lunch.
Johnson wouldn't have made the same mistake because he would have seen D Day as a chance to look 'Churchillian'. I think Os is right and Sunak and his advisors are so in thrall to the anti-European, anti-Climate change, pro-Trump conspiracy theorists that make up the extreme right of their party that they saw this primarily as an opportunity to snub the EU and Macron.tabascoboy wrote: ↑Sun Jun 09, 2024 10:26 amTo be fair, even though he's a buffoon I couldn't see BoJo making such a crass mistake. Does seem to have evolved over the last couple of yearsrobmatic wrote: ↑Sun Jun 09, 2024 10:20 amIt's not just him. He's surrounded by this new breed of Tory that is anti-institution and against British norms and values (or can't distinguish between these and the liberal values they hate).Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Sun Jun 09, 2024 9:36 am
I don’t think he intended to snub anyone. Fundamentally he is a transatlantic man for whom a nation is a tax domicile. He doesn’t have an emotional connection to D Day or any other aspect of history, and didn’t grasp the significance as a result.
He must've deleted it now because your link is 'Not Found'. I followed it through earlier, though, and he was getting bodied in the replies. Especially when he thought to try and rescue the situation with 'I was just asking a question'.
They're doubling down on the "Labour war on the motorists" crap too.Raggs wrote: ↑Sun Jun 09, 2024 9:52 am Is decarbonising the power grid really the policy the Tories want front and centre of their attempts to discredit Labour?
I know there's climate change deniers out there, but the extreme weather we're experiencing surely is going to get in a lot of people's heads and have them thinking this is probably money worth spending?
Climate deniers are probably right wing supporters anyway, you're preaching to the choir, and quite possibly a choir that intends to leave you for other right wing options!
Tories are acting like they can win this election at the moment, nothing suggests that's possible. If I were them I'd be focusing on telling people not to split the vote and let left wing parties get in, in an attempt to get the least amount of pain.
Do we reckon he's resigning?Insane_Homer wrote: ↑Sun Jun 09, 2024 5:52 pm Sunak cancels all media appearances, so manages to go a whole day without personally saying/doing something epically stupid for the first.
There's always a danger when you look to the past to predict the future, that you ignore the fundamentals of the present.Insane_Homer wrote: ↑Sun Jun 09, 2024 6:13 pm I can't see him resigning now. Too thick and stubborn for that. It would also make fuck all difference.
Or he'll be house hunting in New York on Weds.
https://www.threads.net/@graeme.anderso ... D3rOMIyS4wThe Tory candidate for Surrey Heath, Ed McGuinness, has been caught claiming to have moved into the area whilst posing in a local AirBnB - with honesty and integrity like this, he sounds like the perfect successor to Michael Gove
She's looking to the leadership election and that will be her 'vote for me' policy.tabascoboy wrote: ↑Mon Jun 10, 2024 10:21 am "Not much difference": well, she's not wrong - but not quite in the way she means...surely the only reason she doesn't go all out and defect to Reform is that she believes merger is inevitable and she will have a key role
exactly this; the right wing loons are all positioning themselves to be the Tory's next leader with an implicit promise to invite Farage and Reform to join them in an even more extremist Tory party.Biffer wrote: ↑Mon Jun 10, 2024 10:25 amShe's looking to the leadership election and that will be her 'vote for me' policy.tabascoboy wrote: ↑Mon Jun 10, 2024 10:21 am "Not much difference": well, she's not wrong - but not quite in the way she means...surely the only reason she doesn't go all out and defect to Reform is that she believes merger is inevitable and she will have a key role
There's less than zero chance Farage and Johnson would be playing second fiddle to Patel and in the same orbit as each other on equal terms.Lobby wrote: ↑Mon Jun 10, 2024 10:48 amexactly this; the right wing loons are all positioning themselves to be the Tory's next leader with an implicit promise to invite Farage and Reform to join them in an even more extremist Tory party.Biffer wrote: ↑Mon Jun 10, 2024 10:25 amShe's looking to the leadership election and that will be her 'vote for me' policy.tabascoboy wrote: ↑Mon Jun 10, 2024 10:21 am "Not much difference": well, she's not wrong - but not quite in the way she means...surely the only reason she doesn't go all out and defect to Reform is that she believes merger is inevitable and she will have a key role
In the Observer on Sunday David Gauke was quoted as predicting that Priti Patel would emerge as the new Tory leader after the election, strike some kind of deal with Farage, and invite Boris Johnson back in to the parliamentary party on the basis that she is on better terms with Johnson than the other possible leadership contenders from the right such as Braverman, Bad Enoch and Jenrick, and is also on good terms with Farage.
Yeah, this is where the 'Conservative Reform' party will fall down. Farage will want a guarantee he'll be leader. And he doesn't have to pay attention to his membership because his party is a limited company majority owned by him.I like neeps wrote: ↑Mon Jun 10, 2024 12:22 pmThere's less than zero chance Farage and Johnson would be playing second fiddle to Patel and in the same orbit as each other on equal terms.Lobby wrote: ↑Mon Jun 10, 2024 10:48 amexactly this; the right wing loons are all positioning themselves to be the Tory's next leader with an implicit promise to invite Farage and Reform to join them in an even more extremist Tory party.
In the Observer on Sunday David Gauke was quoted as predicting that Priti Patel would emerge as the new Tory leader after the election, strike some kind of deal with Farage, and invite Boris Johnson back in to the parliamentary party on the basis that she is on better terms with Johnson than the other possible leadership contenders from the right such as Braverman, Bad Enoch and Jenrick, and is also on good terms with Farage.
Johnson is never coming back to be a constituency MP/shadow cabinet minister. Farage is not going to be shadow home sec etc.
Surprise, Surprise, his social media footprint is a mine of information that CCHQ somehow managed to ignore.sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Sun Jun 09, 2024 12:14 pmHe must've deleted it now because your link is 'Not Found'. I followed it through earlier, though, and he was getting bodied in the replies. Especially when he thought to try and rescue the situation with 'I was just asking a question'.