Unconscious bias
Edit: I’ve edited this post as it was not the first post originally, so probably quite confusing to people.
———-
It’s not exactly unfathomable we all have unconscious biases.
Through our trusted educators, media and also through lived experiences.
It’s not a stretch to see that I have deep mistrust of those illegal immigrants arriving like a plague.
———-
It’s not exactly unfathomable we all have unconscious biases.
Through our trusted educators, media and also through lived experiences.
It’s not a stretch to see that I have deep mistrust of those illegal immigrants arriving like a plague.
Last edited by Ymx on Tue Oct 24, 2023 8:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
i have a deep mistrust of something called unconscious bias, if it is unconscious how do you know you have it, and if you don't know you have it, how do you fix it?
You are then reliant on someone else to tell you have something called unconscious bias who themselves may have unconscious bias and so on....in other words it is a complete bollox expression.
How does institutional racism grab you?ASMO wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 12:37 pmi have a deep mistrust of something called unconscious bias, if it is unconscious how do you know you have it, and if you don't know you have it, how do you fix it?
You are then reliant on someone else to tell you have something called unconscious bias who themselves may have unconscious bias and so on....in other words it is a complete bollox expression.
Slightly different obviously but a better phrase?
I am not even sure that it means, it is another one of those terms freely banded about but nobody can really define what it means. Does it mean "institutions" have policies and rules that are racially biased? in which case surely that would be illegal...or what?C69 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 12:43 pmHow does institutional racism grab you?ASMO wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 12:37 pmi have a deep mistrust of something called unconscious bias, if it is unconscious how do you know you have it, and if you don't know you have it, how do you fix it?
You are then reliant on someone else to tell you have something called unconscious bias who themselves may have unconscious bias and so on....in other words it is a complete bollox expression.
Slightly different obviously but a better phrase?
It's a nebulous issue. Take the Met Police, it has policies and procedures etc but dispute these. The force has been characterized as misoginistic and racist.ASMO wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 12:47 pmI am not even sure that it means, it is another one of those terms freely banded about but nobody can really define what it means. Does it mean "institutions" have policies and rules that are racially biased? in which case surely that would be illegal...or what?C69 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 12:43 pmHow does institutional racism grab you?ASMO wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 12:37 pm
i have a deep mistrust of something called unconscious bias, if it is unconscious how do you know you have it, and if you don't know you have it, how do you fix it?
You are then reliant on someone else to tell you have something called unconscious bias who themselves may have unconscious bias and so on....in other words it is a complete bollox expression.
Slightly different obviously but a better phrase?
I think I can understand it given the treatment of women and people of colour.
but is that something that is enforced by the institution, or just individuals within that institution? Surely for it to be institutional it has to be something that is supported by policies and practices institution wide.C69 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 12:54 pmIt's a nebulous issue. Take the Met Police, it has policies and procedures etc but dispute these. The force has been characterized as misoginistic and racist.ASMO wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 12:47 pmI am not even sure that it means, it is another one of those terms freely banded about but nobody can really define what it means. Does it mean "institutions" have policies and rules that are racially biased? in which case surely that would be illegal...or what?
I think I can understand it given the treatment of women and people of colour.
I think a bit like unconscious bias it is a very lazy term.
The culture within the institution can give rise to it - ways policies are interpreted, habitual behaviours, what's considered as appropriate banter within an office etc.ASMO wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 1:01 pmbut is that something that is enforced by the institution, or just individuals within that institution? Surely for it to be institutional it has to be something that is supported by policies and practices institution wide.C69 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 12:54 pmIt's a nebulous issue. Take the Met Police, it has policies and procedures etc but dispute these. The force has been characterized as misoginistic and racist.ASMO wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 12:47 pm
I am not even sure that it means, it is another one of those terms freely banded about but nobody can really define what it means. Does it mean "institutions" have policies and rules that are racially biased? in which case surely that would be illegal...or what?
I think I can understand it given the treatment of women and people of colour.
I think a bit like unconscious bias it is a very lazy term.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
There are well established methods for detecting and measuring it. To say it’s a bollocks expression is absolute anti science. Like, from a scientific evidence based perspective, your argument is up there with ‘the world is flat because I can’t see the curves’ASMO wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 12:37 pmi have a deep mistrust of something called unconscious bias, if it is unconscious how do you know you have it, and if you don't know you have it, how do you fix it?
You are then reliant on someone else to tell you have something called unconscious bias who themselves may have unconscious bias and so on....in other words it is a complete bollox expression.
Astounding take.
Thats not what i said though, i said how do you know, how do you detect and how do you treat. I have been on UB courses and they were all pseudo science, there was nothing exact, it was all a bunch of assumptions that may or may not be true and certainly were not measurable in any way.
Humans by nature will have bias and inclinations built in, but the thing is everyone is dfifferent, what motivates and triggers them is governed by an almost infinite combination of experiences that is unique to them.
The UB training courses are indeed dreadful and have a flimsiest of science behind them. But you absolutely can measure unconscious bias in individuals and they typically have good predictive validity. The big problem for the training courses is, as you say, they make completely unwarranted assumptions about the nature of those biases in individuals. The disconnect between those training courses and the state of the art in the field is incredible.ASMO wrote: ↑Tue Oct 24, 2023 8:17 amThats not what i said though, i said how do you know, how do you detect and how do you treat. I have been on UB courses and they were all pseudo science, there was nothing exact, it was all a bunch of assumptions that may or may not be true and certainly were not measurable in any way.
Humans by nature will have bias and inclinations built in, but the thing is everyone is dfifferent, what motivates and triggers them is governed by an almost infinite combination of experiences that is unique to them.
- clydecloggie
- Posts: 1198
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:31 am
Every UB training I've been on (and there were a fair few) essentially amounted to a person of colour telling white people that regardless of their conscious beliefs and actions, subconsciously they're all racists. Which is bollox.
But plenty of research shows that, for instance, identical CVs are rated differently depending on whether the name and/or picture of the non-majority-race applicant is included in the CV - and this then gets interpreted as evidence for unconscious bias. Which completely ignores variation between individuals (if CVs are rated differently on average, it doesn't mean everyone rates CV differently) and the other explanation - that people are consciously biased, i.e. they are knowingly (and presumably, happily) racist.
But plenty of research shows that, for instance, identical CVs are rated differently depending on whether the name and/or picture of the non-majority-race applicant is included in the CV - and this then gets interpreted as evidence for unconscious bias. Which completely ignores variation between individuals (if CVs are rated differently on average, it doesn't mean everyone rates CV differently) and the other explanation - that people are consciously biased, i.e. they are knowingly (and presumably, happily) racist.
-
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 10:08 pm
IIRC when applying for jobs in the NHS (and I assume a load of government) the CV that gets sent to the hiring manager has most personally identifiable information removed to minimize this - just employment history and qualifications.clydecloggie wrote: ↑Tue Oct 24, 2023 9:19 am Every UB training I've been on (and there were a fair few) essentially amounted to a person of colour telling white people that regardless of their conscious beliefs and actions, subconsciously they're all racists. Which is bollox.
But plenty of research shows that, for instance, identical CVs are rated differently depending on whether the name and/or picture of the non-majority-race applicant is included in the CV - and this then gets interpreted as evidence for unconscious bias. Which completely ignores variation between individuals (if CVs are rated differently on average, it doesn't mean everyone rates CV differently) and the other explanation - that people are consciously biased, i.e. they are knowingly (and presumably, happily) racist.
This is correct, no identifying information is on the info pack you receive, age, DOB, gender, ethnicity all removed.Dinsdale Piranha wrote: ↑Tue Oct 24, 2023 11:55 amIIRC when applying for jobs in the NHS (and I assume a load of government) the CV that gets sent to the hiring manager has most personally identifiable information removed to minimize this - just employment history and qualifications.clydecloggie wrote: ↑Tue Oct 24, 2023 9:19 am Every UB training I've been on (and there were a fair few) essentially amounted to a person of colour telling white people that regardless of their conscious beliefs and actions, subconsciously they're all racists. Which is bollox.
But plenty of research shows that, for instance, identical CVs are rated differently depending on whether the name and/or picture of the non-majority-race applicant is included in the CV - and this then gets interpreted as evidence for unconscious bias. Which completely ignores variation between individuals (if CVs are rated differently on average, it doesn't mean everyone rates CV differently) and the other explanation - that people are consciously biased, i.e. they are knowingly (and presumably, happily) racist.
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5389
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
The guy with massive conscious bias is worried about unconscious bias
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
In theory yes but in practice no.Dinsdale Piranha wrote: ↑Tue Oct 24, 2023 11:55 amIIRC when applying for jobs in the NHS (and I assume a load of government) the CV that gets sent to the hiring manager has most personally identifiable information removed to minimize this - just employment history and qualifications.clydecloggie wrote: ↑Tue Oct 24, 2023 9:19 am Every UB training I've been on (and there were a fair few) essentially amounted to a person of colour telling white people that regardless of their conscious beliefs and actions, subconsciously they're all racists. Which is bollox.
But plenty of research shows that, for instance, identical CVs are rated differently depending on whether the name and/or picture of the non-majority-race applicant is included in the CV - and this then gets interpreted as evidence for unconscious bias. Which completely ignores variation between individuals (if CVs are rated differently on average, it doesn't mean everyone rates CV differently) and the other explanation - that people are consciously biased, i.e. they are knowingly (and presumably, happily) racist.
In theory yes but in practice no.Dinsdale Piranha wrote: ↑Tue Oct 24, 2023 11:55 amIIRC when applying for jobs in the NHS (and I assume a load of government) the CV that gets sent to the hiring manager has most personally identifiable information removed to minimize this - just employment history and qualifications.clydecloggie wrote: ↑Tue Oct 24, 2023 9:19 am Every UB training I've been on (and there were a fair few) essentially amounted to a person of colour telling white people that regardless of their conscious beliefs and actions, subconsciously they're all racists. Which is bollox.
But plenty of research shows that, for instance, identical CVs are rated differently depending on whether the name and/or picture of the non-majority-race applicant is included in the CV - and this then gets interpreted as evidence for unconscious bias. Which completely ignores variation between individuals (if CVs are rated differently on average, it doesn't mean everyone rates CV differently) and the other explanation - that people are consciously biased, i.e. they are knowingly (and presumably, happily) racist.
That sounds shocking. Every white guy should be given a safe space in the workplace. You really should sue your employer.clydecloggie wrote: ↑Tue Oct 24, 2023 9:19 am Every UB training I've been on (and there were a fair few) essentially amounted to a person of colour telling white people that regardless of their conscious beliefs and actions, subconsciously they're all racists. Which is bollox.
But plenty of research shows that, for instance, identical CVs are rated differently depending on whether the name and/or picture of the non-majority-race applicant is included in the CV - and this then gets interpreted as evidence for unconscious bias. Which completely ignores variation between individuals (if CVs are rated differently on average, it doesn't mean everyone rates CV differently) and the other explanation - that people are consciously biased, i.e. they are knowingly (and presumably, happily) racist.
"People of colour" with their racism claptrap victimising poor "white people" like you with their harebrained theories.
I'm so sorry.
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 5961
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
Yep my experience also.clydecloggie wrote: ↑Tue Oct 24, 2023 9:19 am Every UB training I've been on (and there were a fair few) essentially amounted to a person of colour telling white people that regardless of their conscious beliefs and actions, subconsciously they're all racists. Which is bollox.
Incidentally, white males are statistically more likely to hire outside their own white male group than are any other category, not that it fits the training
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
- clydecloggie
- Posts: 1198
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:31 am
:shereblue wrote: ↑Thu Oct 26, 2023 1:13 pmThat sounds shocking. Every white guy should be given a safe space in the workplace. You really should sue your employer.clydecloggie wrote: ↑Tue Oct 24, 2023 9:19 am Every UB training I've been on (and there were a fair few) essentially amounted to a person of colour telling white people that regardless of their conscious beliefs and actions, subconsciously they're all racists. Which is bollox.
But plenty of research shows that, for instance, identical CVs are rated differently depending on whether the name and/or picture of the non-majority-race applicant is included in the CV - and this then gets interpreted as evidence for unconscious bias. Which completely ignores variation between individuals (if CVs are rated differently on average, it doesn't mean everyone rates CV differently) and the other explanation - that people are consciously biased, i.e. they are knowingly (and presumably, happily) racist.
"People of colour" with their racism claptrap victimising poor "white people" like you with their harebrained theories.
I'm so sorry.
thumbup:
Yeah, that's what I said.
Got any links for that?Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Thu Oct 26, 2023 2:04 pmYep my experience also.clydecloggie wrote: ↑Tue Oct 24, 2023 9:19 am Every UB training I've been on (and there were a fair few) essentially amounted to a person of colour telling white people that regardless of their conscious beliefs and actions, subconsciously they're all racists. Which is bollox.
Incidentally, white males are statistically more likely to hire outside their own white male group than are any other category, not that it fits the training
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
- Guy Smiley
- Posts: 6014
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:52 pm
What's the percentage of white males in hiring positions as opposed to 'other categories'?Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Thu Oct 26, 2023 2:04 pmYep my experience also.clydecloggie wrote: ↑Tue Oct 24, 2023 9:19 am Every UB training I've been on (and there were a fair few) essentially amounted to a person of colour telling white people that regardless of their conscious beliefs and actions, subconsciously they're all racists. Which is bollox.
Incidentally, white males are statistically more likely to hire outside their own white male group than are any other category, not that it fits the training
-
- Posts: 1148
- Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2020 9:31 am
I grew up in the seventies and eighties.l, I went to Air Cadets at 12 (it was essentially military basic training for 4 years)....they poured a fuck of a lot of bigotry into me at a young age.
Christ some of the songs we used to sing in the back of a mini bus (with adults around btw) were jaw droppingly racist, bigoted, homophobic.
Don't know if that shit is put into our young impressionable minds for life. You cannot unhear it
Christ some of the songs we used to sing in the back of a mini bus (with adults around btw) were jaw droppingly racist, bigoted, homophobic.
Don't know if that shit is put into our young impressionable minds for life. You cannot unhear it
Last edited by Line6 HXFX on Fri Oct 27, 2023 8:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
Surely it was just as racist then as it is now. Why didn't you question it at the time?Line6 HXFX wrote: ↑Fri Oct 27, 2023 7:48 am I grew up in the seventies and eighties.l, I went to Air Cadets at 12 (it was essentially military basic training for 4 years)....they poured a fuck of a lot of bigotry into me at a young age.
Christ some of the songs we used to sing in the back of a mini bus (with adults around btw) were jaw droppingly racist.
Don't know if that shit is put there for life.
-
- Posts: 1148
- Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2020 9:31 am
What can I say, at 14 I was effectively a full blown, signed up member of the Hitler Youth...I was awful. Misogynistic, homophobic, racist, bigoted.
Think Pink singing "yah thought you might like to Go to the Show"
They once brought a Senior WRAF to visit, who was a crash scene investigator. At the end of the talk they asked. "what do you think of Women in the RAF"... to which this otherwise lovely young 14 year old kid said..."women are only good for one thing sir".
The bastards get you with their brilliantly comedic songs, in the back of mini buses, at a young age..on the way to some Duke of Edinburgh award, March.
Think Pink singing "yah thought you might like to Go to the Show"
They once brought a Senior WRAF to visit, who was a crash scene investigator. At the end of the talk they asked. "what do you think of Women in the RAF"... to which this otherwise lovely young 14 year old kid said..."women are only good for one thing sir".
The bastards get you with their brilliantly comedic songs, in the back of mini buses, at a young age..on the way to some Duke of Edinburgh award, March.
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 5961
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
Depends how involved HR are in the hiring process in my line of workGuy Smiley wrote: ↑Fri Oct 27, 2023 1:53 amWhat's the percentage of white males in hiring positions as opposed to 'other categories'?Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Thu Oct 26, 2023 2:04 pmYep my experience also.clydecloggie wrote: ↑Tue Oct 24, 2023 9:19 am Every UB training I've been on (and there were a fair few) essentially amounted to a person of colour telling white people that regardless of their conscious beliefs and actions, subconsciously they're all racists. Which is bollox.
Incidentally, white males are statistically more likely to hire outside their own white male group than are any other category, not that it fits the training
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 5961
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
Honest answer is yes I have read reports on this before, no I don’t have them to hand, so the source is one baby step away from ‘trust me bro’, unless I stumble back upon it.Biffer wrote: ↑Thu Oct 26, 2023 8:17 pmGot any links for that?Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Thu Oct 26, 2023 2:04 pmYep my experience also.clydecloggie wrote: ↑Tue Oct 24, 2023 9:19 am Every UB training I've been on (and there were a fair few) essentially amounted to a person of colour telling white people that regardless of their conscious beliefs and actions, subconsciously they're all racists. Which is bollox.
Incidentally, white males are statistically more likely to hire outside their own white male group than are any other category, not that it fits the training
With all that said, the male/female divide in hiring decisions is really observably obvious to anyone who pays any attention
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
Conscious bias, then?Line6 HXFX wrote: ↑Fri Oct 27, 2023 8:12 am What can I say, at 14 I was effectively a full blown, signed up member of the Hitler Youth...I was awful. Misogynistic, homophobic, racist, bigoted.
Think Pink singing "yah thought you might like to Go to the Show"
They once brought a Senior WRAF to visit, who was a crash scene investigator. At the end of the talk they asked. "what do you think of Women in the RAF"... to which this otherwise lovely young 14 year old kid said..."women are only good for one thing sir".
The bastards get you with their brilliantly comedic songs, in the back of mini buses, at a young age..on the way to some Duke of Edinburgh award, March.
-
- Posts: 1148
- Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2020 9:31 am
Well we get better, but those songs and jokes man, in the back of those buses..they never leave. Maybe unconscous bias is just residual guilt for being such a obscene fuckwit. But I suspect unconscious bias is just another construct of the right, or picked up by the right to make the whole equality thing seem fucking laughable.
Personally, I only care if people pay tax. It seems the people pouring poison into people's ears..the Barkley brother, Murdoch etc,.just want to stoke resentment and division against immigrants as a distraction and to avoid them.
Personally, I only care if people pay tax. It seems the people pouring poison into people's ears..the Barkley brother, Murdoch etc,.just want to stoke resentment and division against immigrants as a distraction and to avoid them.
No worries - just wanted some backup if I mention it at work!Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Fri Oct 27, 2023 8:18 amHonest answer is yes I have read reports on this before, no I don’t have them to hand, so the source is one baby step away from ‘trust me bro’, unless I stumble back upon it.Biffer wrote: ↑Thu Oct 26, 2023 8:17 pmGot any links for that?Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Thu Oct 26, 2023 2:04 pm
Yep my experience also.
Incidentally, white males are statistically more likely to hire outside their own white male group than are any other category, not that it fits the training
With all that said, the male/female divide in hiring decisions is really observably obvious to anyone who pays any attention
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Bit harsh. I cringe at the stuff we used to sing on the back of a rugby bus, usually with one of the dads leading it. I guess back then virtually no one had any exposure to anyone of another race. Not saying that excuses it, but might explain a bit of it.Gumboot wrote: ↑Fri Oct 27, 2023 8:00 amSurely it was just as racist then as it is now. Why didn't you question it at the time?Line6 HXFX wrote: ↑Fri Oct 27, 2023 7:48 am I grew up in the seventies and eighties.l, I went to Air Cadets at 12 (it was essentially military basic training for 4 years)....they poured a fuck of a lot of bigotry into me at a young age.
Christ some of the songs we used to sing in the back of a mini bus (with adults around btw) were jaw droppingly racist.
Don't know if that shit is put there for life.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul