Lemoentjie wrote: Thu Sep 23, 2021 1:27 pm
salanya wrote: Tue Sep 21, 2021 7:33 pm
BBC health correspondent today congratulated the fact that we never had the big September Covid-boom that was expected 6 weeks ago.
Thereby totally ignoring that we've had well over 30k cases for pretty much every day since then, and that on average over 100 people are dying every day, with Covid the 3rd most common cause of death again in August, the highest it's been since March.
Not that everything is doom and gloom, and the vaccines are definitely doing their job, which is great and means that not everything in life has to be Covid-restricted anymore. But at the same time these infections are still very high, there are over 8000 people in hospital with Covid at the moment, the military are needed to help out the NHS in Scotland and Northern Ireland, and all of this is as we're only just coming out of Summer.
I just get frustrated how the Beeb have gone from full panic stations and wall-to-wall reporting, to nearly ignoring the whole situation (if I was cynical I would point out that this accelerated with the departure of Hancock and the arrival of Javid....). The UK must be one of the worst performing Western countries at the moment, especially considering that vaccination numbers are good. So how come these infections, hospitalisations and deaths are still so high? And why do they/we care so little about it?
What do you want them to do? Shut down a country of 60 million because 100 people die each day? Pro-lockdowners often lose sight of scales.
But at the same time these infections are still very high
Are they? 30k is 0.05% of 60 million. Who says 0.05% is very high?
You are lucky to be living in a vaccinated country. You are prepared to give up your freedoms to stop 100 people (with an average age > 80) from dying? For how long? How much longer would those people have lived in a world without Covid?
Good thing that you're a perceptive reader
If you read again you'll see that I'm not pushing for any sort of lockdown, so your anxious labelling is based on nothing, and incorrect.
I'm saying infections are high, based on other Western countries with similar vaccination rates (though you could just compare it to UK numbers at the end of spring, if you prefer).
I'm most familiar with the numbers in the Netherlands, which has over 17 million people (just under 4 times the UK population).
Where there are 500 people currently in Dutch hospitals, compared to the UK's 8000.
Dutch daily infection rates have been between 1300 and 2500 over the last month, whereas the UK numbers are between 26k and 38k daily infections.
As an UK citizen I would expect some research to understand why numbers are so much higher here, with similar vaccination rates and precaution measures.
And that's not to mention death rates. I'm not going to respond to your comments on that, apart from to say that it's not just people aged 80+ dying, and I imagine if it was your own parent/relative on their death bed you wouldn't be quite so dismissive of it.
But my original point is that the public messaging on this has gone a full 180 degrees, whereas numbers have actually been rising.
If the messaging was a bit more pressing on these numbers, perhaps more people would behave more cautiously still (just basic hand-washing and masks in public spaces), limiting infections, illness and deaths. Which in turn would prevent any return of previous measures, so if anything, I'm not a pro-lockdowner, I want to avoid any chance of lockdown.
Over the hills and far away........