Concussion Legal Action Against WR
- Marylandolorian
- Posts: 1247
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 2:47 pm
- Location: Amerikanuak
After a concussion, the brain may no longer make sense of sounds, researchers say a blow to the head can also make it hard to understand speech in a noisy room.
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-sho ... -of-sounds
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-sho ... -of-sounds
-
- Posts: 3065
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:37 am
True, but I'd think world rugby have always the defence of informed consent - the laws are well-defined and there are processes and sanctions to ensure adherence, which you can accept or not. Fritz was in no position to consent (in the sense of agree to continue after that bang), and his team directly failed him - the equivalent of a boxer's corner not throwing the towel in.JM2K6 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 05, 2021 12:13 pmI do think in individual cases like that, the club should be held responsible.inactionman wrote: ↑Fri Nov 05, 2021 9:46 amI'm not sure that gives them a free pass, every employer has as duty of care to employees, but yes, ultimately the governing body should be accountable.
I posted this on the old board, but it's an example of an employer failing their duty of care so miserably that I'd have thought they'd be open for prosecution, let alone litigation. I saw this live and was incredulous, it's just awful. World Rugby unquestionably needed to get a grip on this, but what Toulouse did was unforgivable - within the regulation of the time or no.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrWDOZmhqmg
I appreciate we've (thankfully) moved on from this, and the question is more around how we adjust the sport to reduce risks of long term damage from cumulative brain injury, but for historic cases I'd have thought there's quite a few clubs and coaches who are wide open for court action.
But the whole point of this is that the problem was endemic within the sport, the governing body was not interested in the research, the laws didn't prioritise player health, and the professional game as a whole is much more dangerous than it should be. That's not the fault of individual clubs.
I do of course recognise there are always tests of reasonableness, which is really what this is about - what was a reasonable series of steps for world rugby to take, given the clear physical risks involved. You correctly highlight that they sat on hands around this issue, where it should really have been front and centre.
It's not informed consent if players are misled about the risks and dangers. We're definitely in agreement about Fritz and I see that incident as a very different problem entirely, but yeah, this is all about what WR knew and what they did and didn't do to make the sport safer.inactionman wrote: ↑Fri Nov 05, 2021 4:36 pmTrue, but I'd think world rugby have always the defence of informed consent - the laws are well-defined and there are processes and sanctions to ensure adherence, which you can accept or not. Fritz was in no position to consent (in the sense of agree to continue after that bang), and his team directly failed him - the equivalent of a boxer's corner not throwing the towel in.JM2K6 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 05, 2021 12:13 pmI do think in individual cases like that, the club should be held responsible.inactionman wrote: ↑Fri Nov 05, 2021 9:46 am
I'm not sure that gives them a free pass, every employer has as duty of care to employees, but yes, ultimately the governing body should be accountable.
I posted this on the old board, but it's an example of an employer failing their duty of care so miserably that I'd have thought they'd be open for prosecution, let alone litigation. I saw this live and was incredulous, it's just awful. World Rugby unquestionably needed to get a grip on this, but what Toulouse did was unforgivable - within the regulation of the time or no.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrWDOZmhqmg
I appreciate we've (thankfully) moved on from this, and the question is more around how we adjust the sport to reduce risks of long term damage from cumulative brain injury, but for historic cases I'd have thought there's quite a few clubs and coaches who are wide open for court action.
But the whole point of this is that the problem was endemic within the sport, the governing body was not interested in the research, the laws didn't prioritise player health, and the professional game as a whole is much more dangerous than it should be. That's not the fault of individual clubs.
I do of course recognise there are always tests of reasonableness, which is really what this is about - what was a reasonable series of steps for world rugby to take, given the clear physical risks involved. You correctly highlight that they sat on hands around this issue, where it should really have been front and centre.
No-one was signing up for major memory loss, major personality changes, and early onset dementia...Rylands Law alleges that the risks of concussions and sub-concussive injuries were "known and foreseeable" and lists 24 failures on the part of World Rugby, RFU and WRU.
Yes. I’ve looked a couple of times for any reference to professional sport in their guidance, even if it were just a statement that the guidance doesn’t apply to sport. Haven’t found anything so on the face of it the Health & Safety at Work Regulations apply as much to sport as they do to building sites.
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8223
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
Which professional sport; skiing, darts, rugby, tennis, wrestling, boxing ....GogLais wrote: ↑Sat Nov 06, 2021 4:13 pmYes. I’ve looked a couple of times for any reference to professional sport in their guidance, even if it were just a statement that the guidance doesn’t apply to sport. Haven’t found anything so on the face of it the Health & Safety at Work Regulations apply as much to sport as they do to building sites.
There are a gazillion sports, & if you placed many of them on the same scales as a regular workplace; you'd basically end the sport.
Can you imagine any safety expert doing an assessment of Boxing; & not just deciding after 10 minutes that it is riskier than commercial deep sea diver ?
Even joke professional sports like wresting; has shit like people being smacked over the head with chairs; & a very disturbing death rate from suicide.
H&S Regs basically apply to all employment but the real world effect is far less on say working in an office than working at height. I’m not arguing for or against any HSE involvement, I’m just wondering whether it has the legal power to become involved in the dangers of rugby. That’s all.fishfoodie wrote: ↑Sat Nov 06, 2021 10:49 pmWhich professional sport; skiing, darts, rugby, tennis, wrestling, boxing ....GogLais wrote: ↑Sat Nov 06, 2021 4:13 pmYes. I’ve looked a couple of times for any reference to professional sport in their guidance, even if it were just a statement that the guidance doesn’t apply to sport. Haven’t found anything so on the face of it the Health & Safety at Work Regulations apply as much to sport as they do to building sites.
There are a gazillion sports, & if you placed many of them on the same scales as a regular workplace; you'd basically end the sport.
Can you imagine any safety expert doing an assessment of Boxing; & not just deciding after 10 minutes that it is riskier than commercial deep sea diver ?
Even joke professional sports like wresting; has shit like people being smacked over the head with chairs; & a very disturbing death rate from suicide.
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8223
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
Yeah; you're absolutely right; but I get the impression that Professional Sport has been rather overlooked; possibly because of the relatively small number of people involved; & the difficult of applying the same standards of care to the players, as say the admin staff in the office.GogLais wrote: ↑Sun Nov 07, 2021 12:43 pmH&S Regs basically apply to all employment but the real world effect is far less on say working in an office than working at height. I’m not arguing for or against any HSE involvement, I’m just wondering whether it has the legal power to become involved in the dangers of rugby. That’s all.fishfoodie wrote: ↑Sat Nov 06, 2021 10:49 pmWhich professional sport; skiing, darts, rugby, tennis, wrestling, boxing ....GogLais wrote: ↑Sat Nov 06, 2021 4:13 pm
Yes. I’ve looked a couple of times for any reference to professional sport in their guidance, even if it were just a statement that the guidance doesn’t apply to sport. Haven’t found anything so on the face of it the Health & Safety at Work Regulations apply as much to sport as they do to building sites.
There are a gazillion sports, & if you placed many of them on the same scales as a regular workplace; you'd basically end the sport.
Can you imagine any safety expert doing an assessment of Boxing; & not just deciding after 10 minutes that it is riskier than commercial deep sea diver ?
Even joke professional sports like wresting; has shit like people being smacked over the head with chairs; & a very disturbing death rate from suicide.
I think legal actions over CTE in the US has put the wind up a lot of sports, & they're in for a tough next decade; while they try to bridge the gap between what's happening; & the reasonable duty of care they have to deliver.
Yes, I get it that it’s a hugely contentious and complex topic for the HSE to get into. One thing that I don’t think would work with them is the argument that nobody has to become a professional rugby player, well nobody has to become a steel erector, scaffolder or whatever either.fishfoodie wrote: ↑Sun Nov 07, 2021 6:52 pmYeah; you're absolutely right; but I get the impression that Professional Sport has been rather overlooked; possibly because of the relatively small number of people involved; & the difficult of applying the same standards of care to the players, as say the admin staff in the office.GogLais wrote: ↑Sun Nov 07, 2021 12:43 pmH&S Regs basically apply to all employment but the real world effect is far less on say working in an office than working at height. I’m not arguing for or against any HSE involvement, I’m just wondering whether it has the legal power to become involved in the dangers of rugby. That’s all.fishfoodie wrote: ↑Sat Nov 06, 2021 10:49 pm
Which professional sport; skiing, darts, rugby, tennis, wrestling, boxing ....
There are a gazillion sports, & if you placed many of them on the same scales as a regular workplace; you'd basically end the sport.
Can you imagine any safety expert doing an assessment of Boxing; & not just deciding after 10 minutes that it is riskier than commercial deep sea diver ?
Even joke professional sports like wresting; has shit like people being smacked over the head with chairs; & a very disturbing death rate from suicide.
I think legal actions over CTE in the US has put the wind up a lot of sports, & they're in for a tough next decade; while they try to bridge the gap between what's happening; & the reasonable duty of care they have to deliver.
- Margin__Walker
- Posts: 2744
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:47 am
Interview in the Times today (paywalled) with Kieran Low.
Talks fairly candidly about the toll rugby took on him. Goes into the impact of repeated concussions, alcohol and opioid abuse/addiction whilst playing.
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/kier ... -hbd82nrht
Talks fairly candidly about the toll rugby took on him. Goes into the impact of repeated concussions, alcohol and opioid abuse/addiction whilst playing.
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/kier ... -hbd82nrht
Oof, that's a hard read. Doesn't hold back about the pills either. This is pretty damning too:Margin__Walker wrote: ↑Sun Jan 16, 2022 11:39 pm Interview in the Times today (paywalled) with Kieran Low.
Talks fairly candidly about the toll rugby took on him. Goes into the impact of repeated concussions, alcohol and opioid abuse/addiction whilst playing.
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/kier ... -hbd82nrht
I get back in the team. Then in October against Harlequins, I pop a rib. Snap. Shit. So painful. Young doctor examines me. He’s new, he wants to fit into the culture. I get given a pack of 30/500mg co-codamol (100 tablets), a sleeve of tramadol, a sleeve of Valium and some zopiclone.
Really hard read. It definitely makes me think that there are a lot of young lads in similar positions we don't hear about.JM2K6 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 10:44 amOof, that's a hard read. Doesn't hold back about the pills either. This is pretty damning too:Margin__Walker wrote: ↑Sun Jan 16, 2022 11:39 pm Interview in the Times today (paywalled) with Kieran Low.
Talks fairly candidly about the toll rugby took on him. Goes into the impact of repeated concussions, alcohol and opioid abuse/addiction whilst playing.
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/kier ... -hbd82nrht
I get back in the team. Then in October against Harlequins, I pop a rib. Snap. Shit. So painful. Young doctor examines me. He’s new, he wants to fit into the culture. I get given a pack of 30/500mg co-codamol (100 tablets), a sleeve of tramadol, a sleeve of Valium and some zopiclone.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
- Margin__Walker
- Posts: 2744
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:47 am
Yeah, I'd be surprised if there aren't plenty of stories like that under the surface.
Must be huge pressure to do whatever it takes to grasp an opportunity and play through pain through whatever means necessary. Hopefully the culture is a little better now.
Must be huge pressure to do whatever it takes to grasp an opportunity and play through pain through whatever means necessary. Hopefully the culture is a little better now.
I only comment because I hadn't seen anything like it before - one of the Wasps players seemed to be given a couple of what I assume were painkillers during a break in play against Toulouse. Perfectly legit no doubt and maybe he'd taken to the pitch with toothache or something not rugby related but it looked a bit odd.Margin__Walker wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 10:57 am Yeah, I'd be surprised if there aren't plenty of stories like that under the surface.
Must be huge pressure to do whatever it takes to grasp an opportunity and play through pain through whatever means necessary. Hopefully the culture is a little better now.
I think it would be impossible to be a pro sportsman without some kind of painkiller at some point in a season. What was frightening about that was a club doctor handing over 100's of pills and leaving it to the individual to medicate - or so it was suggestedGogLais wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 3:29 pmI only comment because I hadn't seen anything like it before - one of the Wasps players seemed to be given a couple of what I assume were painkillers during a break in play against Toulouse. Perfectly legit no doubt and maybe he'd taken to the pitch with toothache or something not rugby related but it looked a bit odd.Margin__Walker wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 10:57 am Yeah, I'd be surprised if there aren't plenty of stories like that under the surface.
Must be huge pressure to do whatever it takes to grasp an opportunity and play through pain through whatever means necessary. Hopefully the culture is a little better now.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
I’m sure you’re right. I suppose thinking it through the player may have started the match with an injury (or toothache?), I’m guessing had a painkiller before play and then needed it topped up part way through. Plenty of unknowns there.Slick wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 3:38 pmI think it would be impossible to be a pro sportsman without some kind of painkiller at some point in a season. What was frightening about that was a club doctor handing over 100's of pills and leaving it to the individual to medicate - or so it was suggestedGogLais wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 3:29 pmI only comment because I hadn't seen anything like it before - one of the Wasps players seemed to be given a couple of what I assume were painkillers during a break in play against Toulouse. Perfectly legit no doubt and maybe he'd taken to the pitch with toothache or something not rugby related but it looked a bit odd.Margin__Walker wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 10:57 am Yeah, I'd be surprised if there aren't plenty of stories like that under the surface.
Must be huge pressure to do whatever it takes to grasp an opportunity and play through pain through whatever means necessary. Hopefully the culture is a little better now.
Oh yeah, I agree, never seen a "top up" during a match!GogLais wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 3:46 pmI’m sure you’re right. I suppose thinking it through the player may have started the match with an injury (or toothache?), I’m guessing had a painkiller before play and then needed it topped up part way through. Plenty of unknowns there.Slick wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 3:38 pmI think it would be impossible to be a pro sportsman without some kind of painkiller at some point in a season. What was frightening about that was a club doctor handing over 100's of pills and leaving it to the individual to medicate - or so it was suggestedGogLais wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 3:29 pm
I only comment because I hadn't seen anything like it before - one of the Wasps players seemed to be given a couple of what I assume were painkillers during a break in play against Toulouse. Perfectly legit no doubt and maybe he'd taken to the pitch with toothache or something not rugby related but it looked a bit odd.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
I saw one of the Exeter women pop something at a break in play yesterday. Had me thinking that's the first time I'd seen it in any broadcast rugby.Slick wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 3:48 pmOh yeah, I agree, never seen a "top up" during a match!
If a pain killer, it had me wondering would it even kick in right away? When I pop something for a headache or back issues, it takes quite a while (might just be me?). If the player didn't look laboured to that point, did they really need it? I'd wonder if you gave them a Tic Tac, would that do the trick for them mentally 'needing' pain relief right now?
But I've never played to any decent standard, so can't say anything about the pains/playing through them of playing at that level.
- Margin__Walker
- Posts: 2744
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:47 am
Yeah, I've seen it a few times over the years. But yeah Nieg, guessing it will take 20 mins or so minimum to kick in anyway.
- Margin__Walker
- Posts: 2744
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:47 am
Interestingly Tramadol use especially is rife in professional cycling to allow riders to push on through pain in arduous races
-
- Posts: 3065
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:37 am
The old boy worked in football for many years and had to advise many young footballers to avoid the almost routine injections of cortisone to play through joint injuries.
I'd expect that's pretty much the case for rugby.
I'd expect that's pretty much the case for rugby.
-
- Posts: 792
- Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2020 12:09 pm
Just catching up so a few posts responded to here:
'Top up' painkillers during the game were common even back in my day (as an aside I know the matchday dr at wasps and I'd be amazed if everything isn't massively above bored)
Again, 25 years ago, the amount of pain killers/anti inflams you could stock up on from the medics was incredible
And yea, cortisone joint injections were rife. Even I must have had a dozen or so, but the pressure to play was immense. The roof over my head literally depended on it at one point
'Top up' painkillers during the game were common even back in my day (as an aside I know the matchday dr at wasps and I'd be amazed if everything isn't massively above bored)
Again, 25 years ago, the amount of pain killers/anti inflams you could stock up on from the medics was incredible
And yea, cortisone joint injections were rife. Even I must have had a dozen or so, but the pressure to play was immense. The roof over my head literally depended on it at one point
From an admittedly small sample half say on-field medication is common and half say they’ve never seen it before. Presumably it’s usually done rather more discreetly than it was on Saturday then.Happyhooker wrote: ↑Tue Jan 18, 2022 9:25 am Just catching up so a few posts responded to here:
'Top up' painkillers during the game were common even back in my day (as an aside I know the matchday dr at wasps and I'd be amazed if everything isn't massively above bored)
Again, 25 years ago, the amount of pain killers/anti inflams you could stock up on from the medics was incredible
And yea, cortisone joint injections were rife. Even I must have had a dozen or so, but the pressure to play was immense. The roof over my head literally depended on it at one point
For an entire season at Quins I spent most of the matches laughing in disbelief
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2022 1:20 pm
Surprising that rugby hasn't been banned tbh. Professional boxing is already banned in some places and that's arguably less dangerous.
-
- Posts: 792
- Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2020 12:09 pm
Where is boxing banned??Ethologist wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 12:51 pm Surprising that rugby hasn't been banned tbh. Professional boxing is already banned in some places and that's arguably less dangerous.
I was intrigued by this. Pro boxing banned in Cuba for decades and in Norway and Sweden for a few years, legal in all three now but banned in Iceland I think.Happyhooker wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 1:38 pmWhere is boxing banned??Ethologist wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 12:51 pm Surprising that rugby hasn't been banned tbh. Professional boxing is already banned in some places and that's arguably less dangerous.
My grandson aged eight has taken up mini-rugby. Welsh qualified but I'm not sure that I'd want him taking up professional rugby.
- eldanielfire
- Posts: 852
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:01 pm
Ironically due to all the awareness, protocols and rule changes to the head, now might be the safest time to take up rugby for a kid.GogLais wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 2:08 pmI was intrigued by this. Pro boxing banned in Cuba for decades and in Norway and Sweden for a few years, legal in all three now but banned in Iceland I think.Happyhooker wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 1:38 pmWhere is boxing banned??Ethologist wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 12:51 pm Surprising that rugby hasn't been banned tbh. Professional boxing is already banned in some places and that's arguably less dangerous.
My grandson aged eight has taken up mini-rugby. Welsh qualified but I'm not sure that I'd want him taking up professional rugby.
I'm not sure it's going to make a huge amount of difference to be honesteldanielfire wrote: ↑Fri Jan 21, 2022 11:04 amIronically due to all the awareness, protocols and rule changes to the head, now might be the safest time to take up rugby for a kid.GogLais wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 2:08 pmI was intrigued by this. Pro boxing banned in Cuba for decades and in Norway and Sweden for a few years, legal in all three now but banned in Iceland I think.
My grandson aged eight has taken up mini-rugby. Welsh qualified but I'm not sure that I'd want him taking up professional rugby.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul