Maxwell Guilty
-
- Posts: 3585
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am
Hope they remember to keep the tapes of her cell this time and she releases the black book to mitigate her fate.
Very excited to see how the Spectator react after their Ghislaine is innocent puff pieces they've run the last few months. Of course Andrew Neil the "papers" chairman was in her black book. So maybe that's why but I have a feeling as she knew Boris Johnson it's something to do with him.
Very excited to see how the Spectator react after their Ghislaine is innocent puff pieces they've run the last few months. Of course Andrew Neil the "papers" chairman was in her black book. So maybe that's why but I have a feeling as she knew Boris Johnson it's something to do with him.
Maxwell has been found guilty on five of six counts - including the most serious charge, that of sex trafficking of a minor.
This carries a possible 40-year sentence, which means the 60-year-old could spend the rest of her life behind bars.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/world-u ... a-59435616
Apparently “sex trafficking of a minor” was the biggie that can carry 40 years
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
Count 1: Conspiracy to entice a minor to travel to engage in illegal sex acts - maximum sentence of five years
Count 3: Conspiracy to transport a minor with the intent to engage in criminal sexual activity - maximum sentence of five years
Count 4: Transporting a minor with the intent to engage in criminal sexual activity - maximum sentence of 10 years
Count 5: Conspiracy to commit sex trafficking of minors - maximum sentence of five years
Count 6: Sex trafficking of minors - maximum sentence of 40 years
She was found not guilty of the sixth, for enticing a minor to travel to engage in illegal sex acts.
- Marylandolorian
- Posts: 1247
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 2:47 pm
- Location: Amerikanuak
Wonder if they will bother prosecute any of the blokes who carried out the 'criminal sexual activity' that she was convicted for enabling.
She said nothing pre-trial to try to get a reduced sentence. Why would she squeal now? She’s still loyal to Epstein, the horrible bitch.
The US is a strange place ... I wonder if they will offer her a deal to reduce her sentence if she provides evidence about others involved in the sex crimes? Until now she might have thought she was going to get off, she might still think her appeal will be successful. However once it is clear to her she is destined to rot in jail forever then she might change her stance and look for a deal so she at least has a chance of being free before she dies? There must be some very sweaty old men at the moment!
I shouldn’t butdpedin wrote: ↑Thu Dec 30, 2021 10:06 amThe US is a strange place ... I wonder if they will offer her a deal to reduce her sentence if she provides evidence about others involved in the sex crimes? Until now she might have thought she was going to get off, she might still think her appeal will be successful. However once it is clear to her she is destined to rot in jail forever then she might change her stance and look for a deal so she at least has a chance of being free before she dies? There must be some very sweaty old men at the moment!
I suspect the maga king is one of them though he will likely evade charges due to reduced mental capacity if they ever come.Ymx wrote: ↑Thu Dec 30, 2021 10:42 amI shouldn’t butdpedin wrote: ↑Thu Dec 30, 2021 10:06 amThe US is a strange place ... I wonder if they will offer her a deal to reduce her sentence if she provides evidence about others involved in the sex crimes? Until now she might have thought she was going to get off, she might still think her appeal will be successful. However once it is clear to her she is destined to rot in jail forever then she might change her stance and look for a deal so she at least has a chance of being free before she dies? There must be some very sweaty old men at the moment!
petej wrote: ↑Thu Dec 30, 2021 10:57 amI suspect the maga king is one of them though he will likely evade charges due to reduced mental capacity if they ever come.Ymx wrote: ↑Thu Dec 30, 2021 10:42 amI shouldn’t butdpedin wrote: ↑Thu Dec 30, 2021 10:06 am
The US is a strange place ... I wonder if they will offer her a deal to reduce her sentence if she provides evidence about others involved in the sex crimes? Until now she might have thought she was going to get off, she might still think her appeal will be successful. However once it is clear to her she is destined to rot in jail forever then she might change her stance and look for a deal so she at least has a chance of being free before she dies? There must be some very sweaty old men at the moment!
Very good!
Though probably not Piers Morgan given his recent quote
Though probably not Piers Morgan given his recent quote
Taking to Twitter, Piers took a swipe at the Duke of York, mocking his excuse in view of his 7.9 million followers.
"Will vile sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell now sing like a canary to avoid spending the rest of her life in prison?" he wondered.
"If she does, there could be a lot of rich, powerful & famous people sweating tonight... and not sweating."
To be honest, I’m not sure The Don is caught up in this. He was pretty unequivocal about what he thought of Epstein even before all this blew up.petej wrote: ↑Thu Dec 30, 2021 10:57 amI suspect the maga king is one of them though he will likely evade charges due to reduced mental capacity if they ever come.Ymx wrote: ↑Thu Dec 30, 2021 10:42 amI shouldn’t butdpedin wrote: ↑Thu Dec 30, 2021 10:06 am
The US is a strange place ... I wonder if they will offer her a deal to reduce her sentence if she provides evidence about others involved in the sex crimes? Until now she might have thought she was going to get off, she might still think her appeal will be successful. However once it is clear to her she is destined to rot in jail forever then she might change her stance and look for a deal so she at least has a chance of being free before she dies? There must be some very sweaty old men at the moment!
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
-
- Posts: 3585
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am
Not surprised the BBC messed up on this one. Must be getting quite hard to find people to stick up for Prince Andrew so Epstein's former lawyer who got him his sweetheart deal and someone facing the same accusations as Andy is a good a bet as any.
+1. Obviously they had similar social circles what with them both being wealthy New Yorkers with places in Palm Beach. However, its my understanding that Trump caught wind of what a wrong un Epstein was years ago and gave him a wide berth after that. The actual anecdote is I believe Epstein was trying to groom one of Trumps mates teenage daughters at a country club in Palm Beach.
I think those pictures taken at dinner parties is all that ties Trump to Epstein. Bill Clinton & Prince Andrew on the other hand..........
-
- Posts: 401
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:12 pm
- Location: South Africa
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8221
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
He's also on record, & numerous people have collaborated; as having perved over teenagers on various states of undress; when he hosted the Miss Teen USA, at his resorts !
Corroborated surely, unless you are suggesting there were numerous people perving over the teenagers with him (not impossible I grant you).fishfoodie wrote: ↑Thu Dec 30, 2021 4:52 pmHe's also on record, & numerous people have collaborated; as having perved over teenagers on various states of undress; when he hosted the Miss Teen USA, at his resorts !
Lobby wrote: ↑Thu Dec 30, 2021 5:20 pmCorroborated surely, unless you are suggesting there were numerous people perving over the teenagers with him (not impossible I grant you).fishfoodie wrote: ↑Thu Dec 30, 2021 4:52 pmHe's also on record, & numerous people have collaborated; as having perved over teenagers on various states of undress; when he hosted the Miss Teen USA, at his resorts !
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8221
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
Lobby wrote: ↑Thu Dec 30, 2021 5:20 pmCorroborated surely, unless you are suggesting there were numerous people perving over the teenagers with him (not impossible I grant you).fishfoodie wrote: ↑Thu Dec 30, 2021 4:52 pmHe's also on record, & numerous people have collaborated; as having perved over teenagers on various states of undress; when he hosted the Miss Teen USA, at his resorts !
The BBC have been shocking on this.I like neeps wrote: ↑Thu Dec 30, 2021 11:33 am
Not surprised the BBC messed up on this one. Must be getting quite hard to find people to stick up for Prince Andrew so Epstein's former lawyer who got him his sweetheart deal and someone facing the same accusations as Andy is a good a bet as any.
Invited Epsteins lawyer on to discuss the case, no declaration of interest, no opposing view
Invited Maxwelks brother on to vouch for her, again unopposed
Multiple sympathetic articles online
It's a disgrace
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5389
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-59736227
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p0bdnctb
BBC Narrative continues, "accuser(s)" should read "victim(s)"
Spectator is full fluff piece.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p0bdnctb
BBC Narrative continues, "accuser(s)" should read "victim(s)"
Spectator is full fluff piece.
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
-
- Posts: 2097
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:04 pm
Earlier on, I'm assuming Woman's Hour, they had quite a lengthy interview with someone who's recently put out a book detailing her encounters with Maxwell and Epstein. And that too the BBC allowed to stand without hearing from say Maxwell's family or lawyers as a counterpoint.
We should be able to allow that not every point made needs to have an opposing view presented in all instances, and frankly even if you had an opposing view you might only have two incorrect/biased contributions.
Societal deference to the wealthy and privileged. ‘Our masters and betters’.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
You tend to hear more from the victims and victims relatives/friends and little from the guilty. This is unusual. We've not heard much from Wayne couzens friends and colleagues.Rhubarb & Custard wrote: ↑Fri Dec 31, 2021 12:54 pmEarlier on, I'm assuming Woman's Hour, they had quite a lengthy interview with someone who's recently put out a book detailing her encounters with Maxwell and Epstein. And that too the BBC allowed to stand without hearing from say Maxwell's family or lawyers as a counterpoint.
We should be able to allow that not every point made needs to have an opposing view presented in all instances, and frankly even if you had an opposing view you might only have two incorrect/biased contributions.
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8221
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
I suspect this is the BBC’s editors (and lawyers) being careful to distinguish between the four women involved in the trial, who can be called victims because their allegations have now been proved in the courts, and the other 100 or so women whose accusations about Epstein haven’t been tested in the courts, and so are still referred to as ‘accusers’.Insane_Homer wrote: ↑Fri Dec 31, 2021 9:28 am https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-59736227
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p0bdnctb
BBC Narrative continues, "accuser(s)" should read "victim(s)"
Spectator is full fluff piece.
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8221
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
Not True !Lobby wrote: ↑Fri Dec 31, 2021 9:06 pmI suspect this is the BBC’s editors (and lawyers) being careful to distinguish between the four women involved in the trial, who can be called victims because their allegations have now been proved in the courts, and the other 100 or so women whose accusations about Epstein haven’t been tested in the courts, and so are still referred to as ‘accusers’.Insane_Homer wrote: ↑Fri Dec 31, 2021 9:28 am https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-59736227
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p0bdnctb
BBC Narrative continues, "accuser(s)" should read "victim(s)"
Spectator is full fluff piece.
People focus on the NY charges; that were never ultimately satisfied; but forget that they only reason Epstein wasn't already in Prison; was he got a sweetheart deal from a Republican DA in Florida; which allowed him to plead guilty to dozens of these exact same charges, & walked away scot free !
https://apnews.com/article/jeffrey-epst ... 9a586aa291