NAMA NAMA NAMA
Hogan is trade commissioner now, and he won't back an appeal.The sun god wrote: ↑Wed Jul 15, 2020 9:29 amShe will be out of the portfolio soon enough..... her successor will have to take up the baton.iarmhí wrote: ↑Wed Jul 15, 2020 9:17 amShe's pretty arrogant. I think she will appealThe sun god wrote: ↑Wed Jul 15, 2020 9:16 am
She can appeal all she wants.. I actually don't think they will let her appeal as politically they don't want to piss off Ireland anymore than they already have. How to turn a good European into a pissed off European..... keep needling them unnecessarily.
There are bigger issues in the EU at the moment so I think she will be told to fuck off.
Your point about pissing off Ireland is well made, especially with Paschal now leader of the Eurogroup of Finance ministers.
- The sun god
- Posts: 176
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 6:40 am
- Location: It's nice in Nice.
I was talking with Daughter #1 last night who is a tax lawyer in New York.
She read the judgement yesterday and said it was a total slam dunk. She reckons the chances of the commission appealing are close to zero as there are no grounds.
Her opinion of Ms Vestiger is quite similar to mine actually but when 29 year old women use the 'C' word 4 times in one sentence it doesn't seem so uncouth as when a man says it.
She read the judgement yesterday and said it was a total slam dunk. She reckons the chances of the commission appealing are close to zero as there are no grounds.
Her opinion of Ms Vestiger is quite similar to mine actually but when 29 year old women use the 'C' word 4 times in one sentence it doesn't seem so uncouth as when a man says it.
Talk that the Commission are planning on using article 116 of Lisbon to get their way on taxation using qualified majority voting:
However the Irish government was bright enough to get the following added in as a protocol to the Lisbon Treaty before we voted the second time :Article 116
(ex Article 96 TEC)
Where the Commission finds that a difference between the provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States is distorting the conditions of competition in the internal market and that the resultant distortion needs to be eliminated, it shall consult the Member States concerned.
If such consultation does not result in an agreement eliminating the distortion in question, the European, Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, shall issue the necessary directives. Any other appropriate measures provided for in the Treaties may be adopted.
Can't see how the Commission can wiggle out of that.TAXATION
Article 2
Nothing in the Treaty of Lisbon makes any change of any kind,
for any Member State, to the extent or operation of the
competence of the European Union in relation to taxation.
- The sun god
- Posts: 176
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 6:40 am
- Location: It's nice in Nice.
Why do people make the mistake of underestimating the political savviness of the Irish.
It's the National sport FFS....
It's the National sport FFS....
- Uncle fester
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm
There's a reasonable debate to be had about Apple's (and others) practice of warehousing monies until they can wangle a better deal on tax but that's not the question she sought to ask.Camroc2 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 16, 2020 8:20 am Talk that the Commission are planning on using article 116 of Lisbon to get their way on taxation using qualified majority voting:
However the Irish government was bright enough to get the following added in as a protocol to the Lisbon Treaty before we voted the second time :Article 116
(ex Article 96 TEC)
Where the Commission finds that a difference between the provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States is distorting the conditions of competition in the internal market and that the resultant distortion needs to be eliminated, it shall consult the Member States concerned.
If such consultation does not result in an agreement eliminating the distortion in question, the European, Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, shall issue the necessary directives. Any other appropriate measures provided for in the Treaties may be adopted.
Can't see how the Commission can wiggle out of that.TAXATION
Article 2
Nothing in the Treaty of Lisbon makes any change of any kind,
for any Member State, to the extent or operation of the
competence of the European Union in relation to taxation.
- Hellraiser
- Posts: 2089
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:46 am
It's US tax law that allows that. It's not really anything to do with us.Uncle fester wrote: ↑Thu Jul 16, 2020 12:10 pmThere's a reasonable debate to be had about Apple's (and others) practice of warehousing monies until they can wangle a better deal on tax but that's not the question she sought to ask.Camroc2 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 16, 2020 8:20 am Talk that the Commission are planning on using article 116 of Lisbon to get their way on taxation using qualified majority voting:
However the Irish government was bright enough to get the following added in as a protocol to the Lisbon Treaty before we voted the second time :Article 116
(ex Article 96 TEC)
Where the Commission finds that a difference between the provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States is distorting the conditions of competition in the internal market and that the resultant distortion needs to be eliminated, it shall consult the Member States concerned.
If such consultation does not result in an agreement eliminating the distortion in question, the European, Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, shall issue the necessary directives. Any other appropriate measures provided for in the Treaties may be adopted.
Can't see how the Commission can wiggle out of that.TAXATION
Article 2
Nothing in the Treaty of Lisbon makes any change of any kind,
for any Member State, to the extent or operation of the
competence of the European Union in relation to taxation.
Ceterum censeo delendam esse Muscovia
- Uncle fester
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm
Agreed but companies should pay tax somewhere.Hellraiser wrote: ↑Thu Jul 16, 2020 1:16 pmIt's US tax law that allows that. It's not really anything to do with us.Uncle fester wrote: ↑Thu Jul 16, 2020 12:10 pmThere's a reasonable debate to be had about Apple's (and others) practice of warehousing monies until they can wangle a better deal on tax but that's not the question she sought to ask.Camroc2 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 16, 2020 8:20 am Talk that the Commission are planning on using article 116 of Lisbon to get their way on taxation using qualified majority voting:
However the Irish government was bright enough to get the following added in as a protocol to the Lisbon Treaty before we voted the second time :
Can't see how the Commission can wiggle out of that.
It'll be a race to the bottom otherwise.
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8222
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
And that's the point.Uncle fester wrote: ↑Thu Jul 16, 2020 6:50 pmAgreed but companies should pay tax somewhere.Hellraiser wrote: ↑Thu Jul 16, 2020 1:16 pmIt's US tax law that allows that. It's not really anything to do with us.Uncle fester wrote: ↑Thu Jul 16, 2020 12:10 pm
There's a reasonable debate to be had about Apple's (and others) practice of warehousing monies until they can wangle a better deal on tax but that's not the question she sought to ask.
It'll be a race to the bottom otherwise.
If countries want to piss & moan about tax rates in other Countries, they need to take a look at their own, & sit down like adults, & agree a consensus across nations. Start with the G7, & put massive pressure on real tax havens, & stop them laundering money; then other Countries will believe their argueing in good faith.
At the start of the saga of the EU complaining about our corporation tax rates, someone did an analysis of Frances effective tax rates for the massive French companies; & quelle surprise; they were taxing them at effective lower rates than our rate.
I'm all for harmonization; but Politicians can't expect to put their fingers on the scales, & then bitch about what other Countries are doing.
- Uncle fester
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm
A point that Vestiger chose to do nothing about.
- Hellraiser
- Posts: 2089
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:46 am
Because she was only interested in what she perceived to be low hanging fruit. But take on a big boy? Career suicide.
Ceterum censeo delendam esse Muscovia
PR forum is locked.
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8222
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
-
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:00 pm
I like what you've done with the place ER, the beating a dead horse emoji for Brock and mullet pulls the room together nicely
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8222
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
- anonymous_joe
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:43 am
Seems to be a bit of both.fishfoodie wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 6:25 pmI was hoping the increases were down to a few clusters skewing the numbers
Town has been unbelievably busy - during the day - all of this week. People are clearly bored and listless and eager to do something.
People are also beginning to have more house parties, etc.
https://twitter.com/LeoVaradkar/status/ ... 04233?s=20
Shots fired. Jarring for him to make the point though.
Shots fired. Jarring for him to make the point though.
-
- Posts: 289
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:55 am
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2020 1:32 pm
I'm surprised leo (or supporters) don't play his gay mixed race card that would mind fuck some people.
-
- Posts: 289
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:55 am
Munster man!!!!! wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 7:12 am I'm surprised leo (or supporters) don't play his gay mixed race card that would mind fuck some people.
He’s being very bold by trolling a bunch of twitter outrage merchants - it’s quite funny to be honest
-
- Posts: 289
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:55 am
Cuddihy got slapped around by a deranged pro drugs idiot this morning. How on earth did they give him the drive time gig?
It just gives the morons more ammo for their stupid Tory jibes. Yes, it's a fairly small group who are especially prevalent on Twitter, but I don't think it's the right way to go about things. It's just joining in with the idiots.Duff Paddy wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 6:58 amNobody outside of a tiny proportion of twitter outrage merchants gives a fuck
-
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:00 pm
strikes me as kind of petty to be honest by Leo ; you'd think he'd have better things to be doing than trolling SF fcukwits - then again twitter really is a more user friendly jacks wall from Transporting with just your own shite to write withDuff Paddy wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 7:19 amMunster man!!!!! wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 7:12 am I'm surprised leo (or supporters) don't play his gay mixed race card that would mind fuck some people.
He’s being very bold by trolling a bunch of twitter outrage merchants - it’s quite funny to be honest
-
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:17 am
Leo would have been better off responding to the fashion shoes tweet with something witty/acerbic, instead of going after Boylan on an issue that no one was paying huge attention to
I'm all for going after the shinner twitter mob, but it's important to pick your targets/themes correctly
On a day when a republican scobie has just been convicted of murdering a guard, I'd have been referencing Gerry McCabe, slab Murphy, Paul Quinn etc
Missed opportunity
I'm all for going after the shinner twitter mob, but it's important to pick your targets/themes correctly
On a day when a republican scobie has just been convicted of murdering a guard, I'd have been referencing Gerry McCabe, slab Murphy, Paul Quinn etc
Missed opportunity
It has now jumped the shark to become part of Football365, but is currently busted.
Locke Lamora wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 10:15 am On a day when a republican scobie has just been convicted of murdering a guard, I'd have been referencing Gerry McCabe, slab Murphy, Paul Quinn etc
Missed opportunity
Exactly.