
Who?
against

Teams:
Where?

When?
Sat 5 Feb 4.45PM local time.
Discuss.
As I saw the Autumn (caveat that bar the Japan game I didn't watch all 80 mins of Scotland's games)Slick wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 10:11 amI'm quite surprised by that, but fair enough. I think it looks like a really quite limited squad and team and I think we should be pretty confident going into the game.Paddington Bear wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 9:38 amYes we've always had challenges getting all of our hundreds of thousands of players on the pitch at the same time.weegie01 wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 9:17 am
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/rugby-union ... avourites/
BCM trying hard to take the underdog tag for the Calcutta Cup. Given Scotland have 10% of the resources England have, it is a miracle they have won as many as 29 out of 70 games at home to England. England are always favourites.
Have to say I'm not sure I agree with BCM, I think we turned a corner in the autumn and talent wise I back our side. It isn't clear cut and I think it'll be a close game, but I'm happy enough to call us favourites.
In saying that, the 6N is the 6N and it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest if everything clicks on the day for England and they blow us away. And of course we also have the capacity to blow up, and do regularly
Yes agreed. We could easily double down on the Scotland & Ireland performances from last year, but I have a reasonable degree of confidence we turned that corner in the autumn.JM2K6 wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 10:55 am It's incredibly difficult to predict what England are going to be like. The talent's there - so on that I disagree with Slick - but who knows what they'll be asked to do or how cohesive they'll be.
And we haven't even started boring our Scottish compadres with Jones' frequently bonkers selection 'methods' yet.JM2K6 wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 10:55 am It's incredibly difficult to predict what England are going to be like. The talent's there - so on that I disagree with Slick - but who knows what they'll be asked to do or how cohesive they'll be.
Slick is The Walrus and I claim my lunchtime snifter.Slick wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 11:17 am And then of course Marcus. I haven't seen much of him to be perfectly honest, but I'm not convinced he is the Messiah, we will see.
sockwithaticket wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 1:41 pm I do detect a certain amount of antipathy for young Marcus leaking out from North of Hadrian's Wall. It's like they're concerned Finn will no longer be rugby's premier maverick 10...
Really? All I hear is people like that England have a young fly-half who worships Finn. We're just worried he might be so un-English in his play he won't fit the England game plan. Ends up as a Quins legend with 15 England caps.sockwithaticket wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 1:41 pm I do detect a certain amount of antipathy for young Marcus leaking out from North of Hadrian's Wall. It's like they're concerned Finn will no longer be rugby's premier maverick 10...
I don't think that is a particularly intimidating front 5.JM2K6 wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 12:57 pm Hmm, struggling to see how Genge/LCD/Sinckler/Itoje/Hill doesn't meet the criteria for a "big, hard front 5". Their problems lie beyond the physicality and aggression.
Antipathy? I don't think many people, including myself, know enough about him to feel anything like that. I've certainly not come across anything approaching antipathy.sockwithaticket wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 1:41 pm I do detect a certain amount of antipathy for young Marcus leaking out from North of Hadrian's Wall. It's like they're concerned Finn will no longer be rugby's premier maverick 10...
Marcus Smith wears Finn Russell pyjamas.sockwithaticket wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 1:41 pm I do detect a certain amount of antipathy for young Marcus leaking out from North of Hadrian's Wall. It's like they're concerned Finn will no longer be rugby's premier maverick 10...
OK but in what sense? Just physicality or something else? Is this a comment on quality or 'hardness'? Because, jokes about Genge aside, that's a seriously lumpy aggressive front five.Slick wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 1:49 pmI don't think that is a particularly intimidating front 5.JM2K6 wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 12:57 pm Hmm, struggling to see how Genge/LCD/Sinckler/Itoje/Hill doesn't meet the criteria for a "big, hard front 5". Their problems lie beyond the physicality and aggression.
Genge is just a but meh, bit of a gobshite who hasn't really earned the right to be so yet. LCD is a good hard player but I think we have 3 or 4 hookers who are at least a match for him. I love Sinckler, but he just seems a bit off at the moment, certainly doesn't seem to dominate in the front row.JM2K6 wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 1:58 pmOK but in what sense? Just physicality or something else? Is this a comment on quality or 'hardness'? Because, jokes about Genge aside, that's a seriously lumpy aggressive front five.Slick wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 1:49 pmI don't think that is a particularly intimidating front 5.JM2K6 wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 12:57 pm Hmm, struggling to see how Genge/LCD/Sinckler/Itoje/Hill doesn't meet the criteria for a "big, hard front 5". Their problems lie beyond the physicality and aggression.
To be clear I'm not asking you to justify your opinion or anything, I just want to make sure I understand it. It's always interesting to see how other countries view our players!
OK, sounds more like a quality thing than anything else (and fair enough)Slick wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 3:29 pmGenge is just a but meh, bit of a gobshite who hasn't really earned the right to be so yet. LCD is a good hard player but I think we have 3 or 4 hookers who are at least a match for him. I love Sinckler, but he just seems a bit off at the moment, certainly doesn't seem to dominate in the front row.JM2K6 wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 1:58 pmOK but in what sense? Just physicality or something else? Is this a comment on quality or 'hardness'? Because, jokes about Genge aside, that's a seriously lumpy aggressive front five.
To be clear I'm not asking you to justify your opinion or anything, I just want to make sure I understand it. It's always interesting to see how other countries view our players!
Itoje is undoubtable a fantastic 2nd row but I'm not sure he is the type of player you would call a big hard front 5 - but he has plenty of other attributes so that is in no way a criticism. When Hill plays well he definitely does fit that category.
I'm not trying to denigrate anyone, I just think that when England are a good side they have a front 5 who will front up against anyone and I'm not sure these guys strike fear into many hearts at the moment. Not that ours do either, but they rarely do.
It's not a bad post, but LCD is better than any of the Scottish hookersJM2K6 wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 3:49 pmOK, sounds more like a quality thing than anything else (and fair enough)Slick wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 3:29 pmGenge is just a but meh, bit of a gobshite who hasn't really earned the right to be so yet. LCD is a good hard player but I think we have 3 or 4 hookers who are at least a match for him. I love Sinckler, but he just seems a bit off at the moment, certainly doesn't seem to dominate in the front row.JM2K6 wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 1:58 pm
OK but in what sense? Just physicality or something else? Is this a comment on quality or 'hardness'? Because, jokes about Genge aside, that's a seriously lumpy aggressive front five.
To be clear I'm not asking you to justify your opinion or anything, I just want to make sure I understand it. It's always interesting to see how other countries view our players!
Itoje is undoubtable a fantastic 2nd row but I'm not sure he is the type of player you would call a big hard front 5 - but he has plenty of other attributes so that is in no way a criticism. When Hill plays well he definitely does fit that category.
I'm not trying to denigrate anyone, I just think that when England are a good side they have a front 5 who will front up against anyone and I'm not sure these guys strike fear into many hearts at the moment. Not that ours do either, but they rarely do.
Yeah I rate this Scottish side and its front row but 4 hookers as good as LCD or better is a reach.Happyhooker wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 6:16 pmIt's not a bad post, but LCD is better than any of the Scottish hookersJM2K6 wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 3:49 pmOK, sounds more like a quality thing than anything else (and fair enough)Slick wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 3:29 pm
Genge is just a but meh, bit of a gobshite who hasn't really earned the right to be so yet. LCD is a good hard player but I think we have 3 or 4 hookers who are at least a match for him. I love Sinckler, but he just seems a bit off at the moment, certainly doesn't seem to dominate in the front row.
Itoje is undoubtable a fantastic 2nd row but I'm not sure he is the type of player you would call a big hard front 5 - but he has plenty of other attributes so that is in no way a criticism. When Hill plays well he definitely does fit that category.
I'm not trying to denigrate anyone, I just think that when England are a good side they have a front 5 who will front up against anyone and I'm not sure these guys strike fear into many hearts at the moment. Not that ours do either, but they rarely do.
Would it be a disaster? It's not like Ford hasn't been playing out of his skin, and he's hardly a sea anchor at Test level.
???? Have you seen a team announcement I haven't????dkm57 wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 9:13 am My thoughts for what they're worth. It should be a very close game Scotland have the players to bet anyone but equally capable of a collective brainfart and getting humped by anyone. I can't remember us ever having such quality and in depth from 1-15.
Smith is a huge talent, I'm glad he's on the bench. 9 is where England is weakest, it's a Blackhole that the ball struggles to emerge from. Farrel not playing I reckon is in England favour IMO he's an overrated c#nt. Itoje has evolved into a great player.
Should be an enthralling gameprobably all come down to which set of props piss the ref off most
![]()
Team is announced on ThursdayHappyhooker wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 9:27 am???? Have you seen a team announcement I haven't????dkm57 wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 9:13 am My thoughts for what they're worth. It should be a very close game Scotland have the players to bet anyone but equally capable of a collective brainfart and getting humped by anyone. I can't remember us ever having such quality and in depth from 1-15.
Smith is a huge talent, I'm glad he's on the bench. 9 is where England is weakest, it's a Blackhole that the ball struggles to emerge from. Farrel not playing I reckon is in England favour IMO he's an overrated c#nt. Itoje has evolved into a great player.
Should be an enthralling gameprobably all come down to which set of props piss the ref off most
![]()
The "smith on the bench" stuff is more us whinging about Eddie
Redpath looked in pretty good nick in his comeback match for Bath on Friday nightBig D wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 9:46 am Scotland have the quality to win but also have it in them to get humped.
Bookies have England as favourites and I can't see any reason to disagree really. The Scotland attack was pretty uninspiring in the autumn and if Redpath isn't fit enough to play then our centres are quite bland which puts a lot of pressure on Russell.
Looking forward to seeing Smith v Russell, both players who look to play good attacking rugby. Hopefully the gameplans from the coaches let them.