When did she quit? Isn't the whole royalty thing a masquerade?
I commend NPR for not having a Harry and Meghan thread!!
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11910
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
I've no idea what's in their deal with Netflix or anyone else. They're in their mid 30s and they'll need enough to keep them in the manner to which they're accustomed for maybe the next fifty plus years and to leave a nice trust fund for the kids. I'm not bothered either way but I suspect that the income stream will dry up in the next few years.JM2K6 wrote: Fri Mar 12, 2021 5:03 pmNot really sure what that has to do with my reply tbh - the money's sorted, the work'll still be valid for years if that's the route they do go down.GogLais wrote: Fri Mar 12, 2021 4:40 pmI dare say they'll coin it for a while but all they've got to sell is being ex-Royals. No doubt there'll be a book but they can only tell their story so many times before interest wanes.JM2K6 wrote: Fri Mar 12, 2021 4:07 pm The Netflix stuff is megabucks so money isn't going to be a problem. They'll probably end up doing a lot of charity / foundation work, by the sounds of things.
They’ve got to pay for expensive security for their livesGogLais wrote: Fri Mar 12, 2021 4:40 pmI dare say they'll coin it for a while but all they've got to sell is being ex-Royals. No doubt there'll be a book but they can only tell their story so many times before interest wanes.JM2K6 wrote: Fri Mar 12, 2021 4:07 pm The Netflix stuff is megabucks so money isn't going to be a problem. They'll probably end up doing a lot of charity / foundation work, by the sounds of things.
Yeah I wonder if the Netflix/Spotify cash is all coming at once or conditional? Unless they turn out to be amazing content producers then their fame will be the hook.
It all sounds a bit vague?
Earlier in the year, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle announced that they had created a production company and signed a deal with Netflix.
As part of the agreement, the couple are expect to make documentaries, docu-series, feature films, scripted shows and children’s programming.
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex said their new endeavour would be focused on “creating content that informs but also gives hope”.
It all sounds a bit vague?
They'll be earning north of £100m from the Netflix and Spotify deals. They were independently wealthy before this. The money really isn't a problem (and indeed there's no way they could have gotten to this point if they weren't already fabulously wealthy).GogLais wrote: Fri Mar 12, 2021 5:44 pmI've no idea what's in their deal with Netflix or anyone else. They're in their mid 30s and they'll need enough to keep them in the manner to which they're accustomed for maybe the next fifty plus years and to leave a nice trust fund for the kids. I'm not bothered either way but I suspect that the income stream will dry up in the next few years.JM2K6 wrote: Fri Mar 12, 2021 5:03 pmNot really sure what that has to do with my reply tbh - the money's sorted, the work'll still be valid for years if that's the route they do go down.GogLais wrote: Fri Mar 12, 2021 4:40 pm
I dare say they'll coin it for a while but all they've got to sell is being ex-Royals. No doubt there'll be a book but they can only tell their story so many times before interest wanes.
edit: All reports have the Netflix deal at >$100m, and Spotify at $25-35m.
Dunno why you all think they need to “work” until their late 60s like the rest of us. They’re both already loaded. Do some occasional publicity work, a Netflix show and raise your kids in the sun.
Why would they want or need to have serious careers?
Why would they want or need to have serious careers?

JM2K6 wrote: Fri Mar 12, 2021 6:01 pmThey'll be earning north of £100m from the Netflix and Spotify deals. They were independently wealthy before this. The money really isn't a problem (and indeed there's no way they could have gotten to this point if they weren't already fabulously wealthy).GogLais wrote: Fri Mar 12, 2021 5:44 pmI've no idea what's in their deal with Netflix or anyone else. They're in their mid 30s and they'll need enough to keep them in the manner to which they're accustomed for maybe the next fifty plus years and to leave a nice trust fund for the kids. I'm not bothered either way but I suspect that the income stream will dry up in the next few years.JM2K6 wrote: Fri Mar 12, 2021 5:03 pm
Not really sure what that has to do with my reply tbh - the money's sorted, the work'll still be valid for years if that's the route they do go down.
edit: All reports have the Netflix deal at >$100m, and Spotify at $25-35m.
-
- Posts: 401
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:12 pm
- Location: South Africa
Pretty much sums up my feeling about this.
One thing's for sure, if I were MM I'd stay the fuck away from any tunnel for the foreseeable future.
What's the Covid limit - fifteen? That'll be a good excuse.Openside wrote: Sat Mar 13, 2021 8:48 am The first big test of how this has panned out for M&H is when Harry lands back in the U.K. for Prince Philip’s funeral.(sadly suspect reasonable soon). I do not think there is a cat in hells chance that Meghan will accompany him.
For people who are sympathetic to M & H, the result of that opinion poll will quite possibly serve to support Harry's accusation that British society is prejudiced/racist/bigoted.JM2K6 wrote: Fri Mar 12, 2021 4:05 pmYou can't divorce public opinion of the interview from the UK media coverage of the interview and issues raised. It's been an avalanche of anti-M&H / pro-Royalty pieces. Particularly as most people in the UK woke up to the coverage and opinion pieces, rather than watching it live.Lobby wrote: Fri Mar 12, 2021 3:33 pm Although I realise that Meghan's main aim in this interview was to relaunch herself in the US, I'm guessing they were hoping for a slightly better response than this in the UK
At the same time, the Queen’s net approval rating has gone up slightly since the interview
Positive: 80% (-)
Negative: 14% (-1)
Oh I don’t know. I actually spent an evening with Kate once and there is definitely something about her
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
They're both fine looking women although one of them is now firmly in the whiny, self-entitled, victim camp; which is decidedly unattractive.
Chris Jack, 67 test All Black - "I was voted most useless and laziest cunt in the English Premiership two years on the trot"
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
Is this 'who would you shag' or 'who would you want to have a conversation with'? Sort it out.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
I'm a lover not a shagger. When I get intimate with a woman I want everything to be centred on her enjoyment and I would find that difficult if I didn't respect her as a person. I guess what I'm saying is that if I was Yeeb and I had to spurt on her back while she slept, albeit in pyjamas, I would choose Meghan.Paddington Bear wrote: Sat Mar 13, 2021 12:15 pm Is this 'who would you shag' or 'who would you want to have a conversation with'? Sort it out.
Chris Jack, 67 test All Black - "I was voted most useless and laziest cunt in the English Premiership two years on the trot"
- Muttonbird
- Posts: 377
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:09 am
That you have to ask.Openside wrote: Tue Mar 09, 2021 11:11 pmWhich bit of that is incorrect?Muttonbird wrote: Tue Mar 09, 2021 10:03 pmAs if you couldn't stoop any lower.Openside wrote: Tue Mar 09, 2021 1:37 pm
Tbf I don’t think anyone has forgotten about him. Shagging a 17 year old isn’t illegal it’s just creepy. We won’t find out whether this young lady was trafficked (and whether he knew) until Ghislaine goes on trial I suspect...![]()

- Muttonbird
- Posts: 377
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:09 am
Amazed they have included Meghan at all. But notice where she, the brown one, is in the eyes of the British public?YouGov has the latest approval ratings in the UK for the Royal Family. They are:
The Queen +66%
Prince William +60%
Catherine +57%
Princess Anne +49%
Prince Edward +15%
Prince Charles +7%
Prince Harry -3%
Camilla -7%
Meghan -27%
Prince Andrew -75%
Just one spot above the pedophile...
So indulge my stupidity and point it out!!Muttonbird wrote: Sat Mar 13, 2021 11:05 pmThat you have to ask.![]()

- Chrysoprase
- Posts: 257
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:59 am
Are you suggesting her approval rating is based on her colour rather than her behaviour?Muttonbird wrote: Sun Mar 14, 2021 7:46 amAmazed they have included Meghan at all. But notice where she, the brown one, is in the eyes of the British public?YouGov has the latest approval ratings in the UK for the Royal Family. They are:
The Queen +66%
Prince William +60%
Catherine +57%
Princess Anne +49%
Prince Edward +15%
Prince Charles +7%
Prince Harry -3%
Camilla -7%
Meghan -27%
Prince Andrew -75%
Just one spot above the pedophile...
There seems to be an increasingly large number of people who think that way. Skin colour/ethnicity, genitalia, sexual preference and a few other things can be tremendously important when it comes to stuff like credibility and approval ratings.Chrysoprase wrote: Sun Mar 14, 2021 12:14 pmAre you suggesting her approval rating is based on her colour rather than her behaviour?Muttonbird wrote: Sun Mar 14, 2021 7:46 amAmazed they have included Meghan at all. But notice where she, the brown one, is in the eyes of the British public?YouGov has the latest approval ratings in the UK for the Royal Family. They are:
The Queen +66%
Prince William +60%
Catherine +57%
Princess Anne +49%
Prince Edward +15%
Prince Charles +7%
Prince Harry -3%
Camilla -7%
Meghan -27%
Prince Andrew -75%
Just one spot above the pedophile...
Chris Jack, 67 test All Black - "I was voted most useless and laziest cunt in the English Premiership two years on the trot"
- Muttonbird
- Posts: 377
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:09 am

Ultra-gammon and workplace bully, Jeremy Clarkson, underlines his own and his followers' fading relevancy by revving up in The Sun about Meghan Markle.
So fragile are they, the belief is she is trying to take down the monarchy. This mirrors the complaints from the alt-right the world over. That any challenge to white patriarchal dominance, no matter how mild, is to be mercilessly crushed. And that being a bully is a birthright.
I think she just wants to shine a light on the arcane structure of monarchistic Britain in the hope it will sometime get with the 21st Century.
In claiming Markle will soon be on a Playboy's yacht, Clarkson has Diana-ised her. Perhaps he wishes her dead in a high speed car crash too…
https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/entertai ... -soon.html
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8727
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
Does anyone actually believe this pond scum ?
If ever there was a non-denial denial, this is it.
If ever there was a non-denial denial, this is it.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-65531864Piers Morgan says he was not aware of phone hacking at Daily Mirror
Piers Morgan says he is not aware of phone hacking taking place while he was editor of the Daily Mirror.
A High Court case against its owners, Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN), brought by Prince Harry and several other high-profile figures, began on Wednesday.
Lawyers argue that executives at the publisher knew about widespread phone hacking, but failed to act.
Speaking before the trial, Mr Morgan said: "I've never hacked a phone. I've never told anybody to hack a phone."
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5505
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
Wouldn't it be wonderful if someone hacked Morgan's phone and found evidence that proves he was lying about ordering the phone hacking.
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8727
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
Turns out that having less morals than a sewer rat makes you really valuable to other billionaire sewer ratsEnergiseR2 wrote: Tue Jun 06, 2023 4:50 pm So I knew about the hacking, encouraged it, laughed about it at meetings but let me be clear I never did it myself as it seemed complicated and did not tell anyone to do it or not to do it
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8727
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
I think this story is one where it strains the credibility of the stories only coming from, "sources".

It was a phone conversation between two brothers, both of whom hated the press, & weren't likely to leak their side of it for a drink from some parasite journo.
The only credible way they get that quote was by hacking the comms.

It was a phone conversation between two brothers, both of whom hated the press, & weren't likely to leak their side of it for a drink from some parasite journo.
The only credible way they get that quote was by hacking the comms.