I'm doubtful that will alter anything. These reds are costing sides games and in the most important comp there is.Biffer wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:30 pmNeeds bigger punishments before that changes.Torquemada 1420 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:28 pm Whatever else in terms of the quality of decision making, bunker system or no, we are seeing no evidence of players modifying behaviour. Just more reds and injuries.
Notable that last night was extremely physical, brutal, and punishing but no high tackles.
RWC R2 Scotland v Tonga 24/9
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11155
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
Exactly, we get better decisions without the waiting around and theatrics from IrishPaddington Bear wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:32 pmDoes it matter? Assuming they don’t cock up the call heresockwithaticket wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:30 pmPredicted it as soon as they brought the bunker system in, we're only going to see on field reds for stuff like obvious punches or head butts from now on.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
There were a few t that were missed tbh.Biffer wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:30 pmNeeds bigger punishments before that changes.Torquemada 1420 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:28 pm Whatever else in terms of the quality of decision making, bunker system or no, we are seeing no evidence of players modifying behaviour. Just more reds and injuries.
Notable that last night was extremely physical, brutal, and punishing but no high tackles.
However they were marginal.
Point taken
-
- Posts: 8664
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am
We could try longer bans too. When the average is 2 - 3 week, depending on whether or not the player has already been through the nonsense 'tackle school' - there's really not a huge amount of deterrent.Slick wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:29 pmQuite. No option but to drop the tackle height nowTorquemada 1420 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:28 pm Whatever else in terms of the quality of decision making, bunker system or no, we are seeing no evidence of players modifying behaviour. Just more reds and injuries.
Farrell got 4 weeks for his 4th offence FFS.
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 5961
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
Tbh a lot of this is just Tonga, they love dumb rugby and have done for as long as I’ve watched themPCPhil wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:32 pmGreat point.Biffer wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:30 pmNeeds bigger punishments before that changes.Torquemada 1420 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:28 pm Whatever else in terms of the quality of decision making, bunker system or no, we are seeing no evidence of players modifying behaviour. Just more reds and injuries.
Notable that last night was extremely physical, brutal, and punishing but no high tackles.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
It probably doesn’t matter in terms of the right penalty, but I wonder if it affects the psychology / severity of saying THAT will not be tolerated, he’s off?Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:32 pmDoes it matter? Assuming they don’t cock up the call heresockwithaticket wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:30 pmPredicted it as soon as they brought the bunker system in, we're only going to see on field reds for stuff like obvious punches or head butts from now on.
Certainly lessens the drama from a viewer perspective. :)
Yup, until they actually are forced to start coaching it differently by lowering the height teams are obviously deciding it’s worth the riskTorquemada 1420 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:33 pmI'm doubtful that will alter anything. These reds are costing sides games and in the most important comp there is.Biffer wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:30 pmNeeds bigger punishments before that changes.Torquemada 1420 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:28 pm Whatever else in terms of the quality of decision making, bunker system or no, we are seeing no evidence of players modifying behaviour. Just more reds and injuries.
Notable that last night was extremely physical, brutal, and punishing but no high tackles.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 5961
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
Which is, in fairness, the point. The baying for cards was clearly influencing refs and taking foreverNiegs wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:34 pmIt probably doesn’t matter in terms of the right penalty, but I wonder if it affects the psychology / severity of saying THAT will not be tolerated, he’s off?Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:32 pmDoes it matter? Assuming they don’t cock up the call heresockwithaticket wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:30 pm
Predicted it as soon as they brought the bunker system in, we're only going to see on field reds for stuff like obvious punches or head butts from now on.
Certainly lessens the drama from a viewer perspective. :)
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
I think it willTorquemada 1420 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:33 pmI'm doubtful that will alter anything. These reds are costing sides games and in the most important comp there is.Biffer wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:30 pmNeeds bigger punishments before that changes.Torquemada 1420 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:28 pm Whatever else in terms of the quality of decision making, bunker system or no, we are seeing no evidence of players modifying behaviour. Just more reds and injuries.
Notable that last night was extremely physical, brutal, and punishing but no high tackles.
1. longer suspensions are likely to lead to a need for even bigger squads. Clubs can’t afford that now so pressure from above to change tackle height
2. Players who get banned will get either penalty clauses in contracts or they won’t get contracts at all. Can’t pay expensive players to sit on the pine nowadays.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
-
- Posts: 8664
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am
I think it was better for the decision to be made at the time with the officials talking through the process. Even if it wasn't 100% right (and neither has the bunker been so far) the audience were at least privy to the rationale. The TMO making the decision and then just announcing to the ref whehter something stays yellow or red, is much more opaque.Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:32 pmDoes it matter? Assuming they don’t cock up the call heresockwithaticket wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:30 pmPredicted it as soon as they brought the bunker system in, we're only going to see on field reds for stuff like obvious punches or head butts from now on.
Prep yourself as soon as the WC is over. Was listening to Dr Ross Tucker’s podcast a couple of weeks ago and he hinted at a WR announcement he wasn’t allowed to reveal. His co-host didn’t dig but I bet it’s a global tackle height drop (sternum would be my guess, if it happens).Slick wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:29 pmQuite. No option but to drop the tackle height nowTorquemada 1420 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:28 pm Whatever else in terms of the quality of decision making, bunker system or no, we are seeing no evidence of players modifying behaviour. Just more reds and injuries.
Very good point.Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:35 pmWhich is, in fairness, the point. The baying for cards was clearly influencing refs and taking foreverNiegs wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:34 pmIt probably doesn’t matter in terms of the right penalty, but I wonder if it affects the psychology / severity of saying THAT will not be tolerated, he’s off?Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:32 pm
Does it matter? Assuming they don’t cock up the call here
Certainly lessens the drama from a viewer perspective. :)
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11155
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
Great if it happens. Sick of this unwanted import from Sumoball.Niegs wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:39 pmPrep yourself as soon as the WC is over. Was listening to Dr Ross Tucker’s podcast a couple of weeks ago and he hinted at a WR announcement he wasn’t allowed to reveal. His co-host didn’t dig but I bet it’s a global tackle height drop (sternum would be my guess, if it happens).Slick wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:29 pmQuite. No option but to drop the tackle height nowTorquemada 1420 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:28 pm Whatever else in terms of the quality of decision making, bunker system or no, we are seeing no evidence of players modifying behaviour. Just more reds and injuries.
I read elsewhere that barring an obvious punch/gouge etc, refs have been directed to use the bunker.
Saw it mentioned and doubted it, but the person saying it was pretty sure. I haven't seen the official guidelines to that effect, though.
-
- Posts: 1856
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2020 9:53 am
Lol, how have they given that as a yellow?
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 5961
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
LOL
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
How the fuck is there any mitigation there? It’s the most obvious straight red I’ve seen in forever.
It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.
I don’t see how this will solve anything. People aren’t hitting high because the rules permit it, they’re hitting high because it’s inherently advantageous in this sport. In fact, I can’t see how this won’t mean MORE cards and endlessly bickering about how much sanction every single contact should warrant.Niegs wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:39 pmPrep yourself as soon as the WC is over. Was listening to Dr Ross Tucker’s podcast a couple of weeks ago and he hinted at a WR announcement he wasn’t allowed to reveal. His co-host didn’t dig but I bet it’s a global tackle height drop (sternum would be my guess, if it happens).Slick wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:29 pmQuite. No option but to drop the tackle height nowTorquemada 1420 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:28 pm Whatever else in terms of the quality of decision making, bunker system or no, we are seeing no evidence of players modifying behaviour. Just more reds and injuries.
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11155
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
Looks like there is a different threshold for headshots. If it's against a Scot, it's okay?
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 5961
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
Colossally dumb rugby from Scotland, are you England in disguise
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
- OomStruisbaai
- Posts: 15454
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2020 12:38 pm
- Location: Longest beach in SH
Whittaker try
- S/Lt_Phillips
- Posts: 516
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:31 pm
What was Harris doing there?
Left hand down a bit
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5389
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
That’s the point, coaches have decided it’s worth the risk to keep hitting that high. Lower the permitted height and it won’t be near the head even if it’s slightly illegalFonz wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:52 pmI don’t see how this will solve anything. People aren’t hitting high because the rules permit it, they’re hitting high because it’s inherently advantageous in this sport. In fact, I can’t see how this won’t mean MORE cards and endlessly bickering about how much sanction every single contact should warrant.Niegs wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:39 pmPrep yourself as soon as the WC is over. Was listening to Dr Ross Tucker’s podcast a couple of weeks ago and he hinted at a WR announcement he wasn’t allowed to reveal. His co-host didn’t dig but I bet it’s a global tackle height drop (sternum would be my guess, if it happens).
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11155
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 5961
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
Should have taken the 3 there!
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day