Yup, as I suspected, Tory MP level of thickery.Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2020 6:42 pmClearly explain what a false positive rate of 1% would mean for test results in the UK ?
How many of the 6,000 positives from 175,000 would be indicated as wrong ?
If there are 6,000 positives, that number includes the false-positives, so a 1% error is 60 cases that could have been positive tests that were... false, meaning 5,940 were correct and 60 were... false-positives.
False-negatives however, can be attributed to the testing pool of 175,000, so 1% a false-negative could mean the positives could under reported and be as high as 7750.