The Scottish Politics Thread
Problem is we’re not prepared to invest in these. We have to raise tens of billions to improve rail infrastructure and that’s going to be public money.
How do you convince people to do that? The private sector has had thirty years of access and haven’t.
North to Aberdeen and Inverness we need a line that doesn’t stop at every house, in other words a line direct from Dunfermline to Perth via Kinross. And more dual line sections north of Perth for Inverness.
WRT price, we need to stop subsidising airlines and put tax on aviation fuel. But we can’t do that in isolation.
How do you convince people to do that? The private sector has had thirty years of access and haven’t.
North to Aberdeen and Inverness we need a line that doesn’t stop at every house, in other words a line direct from Dunfermline to Perth via Kinross. And more dual line sections north of Perth for Inverness.
WRT price, we need to stop subsidising airlines and put tax on aviation fuel. But we can’t do that in isolation.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
-
- Posts: 3398
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:37 am
Flybe used to do a really handy flights into London City, but now they've gone under it's just BA who run that route - Flybe were dirt cheap at weekends when there weren't any city slickers looking to travel. My family are now all out east so it was perfect for me.robmatic wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 8:20 amTimewise, I always thought that rail and flights between Edinburgh and London were broadly similar anyway once you factor in schlepping out to the airport and then making your way into central London. I feel that with business travel there is a prestige factor in play though: there is a breed of manager who feel important because they "had to fly to London this week".Slick wrote: Tue Jan 21, 2025 10:41 pmAgree again, I was just thinking more of getting business travel to London off flightsTichtheid wrote: Tue Jan 21, 2025 10:21 pm
I'd settle for reasonable fares, a reliable service and not having to go north to go south whilst passing the station I started from on the way.
The faster trains from Edinburgh to London will make this last point worse.
Aside from London city, all the other London airports are massive pains in the arse as they're nowhere near London.
Convenience-wise, I'd take London City in preference to the train, I'd take the train ahead of anything else.
LNER do some decent family deals as well, which makes the train more attractive if I'm taking the kids.
-
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2020 4:35 pm
London - Edinburgh Overnight Flixbus this week is like £50-66. Can still get some sub £40 on Megabus and National Express.Blackmac wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 9:08 am
The prices are eye watering though, unless you can book 3 months in advance. I had a last minute trip to London last year and the cheapest train was just under £300.
Last night could book a flight this morning from Heathrow at £54. Overnight Lumo was £100 something. Flight of course needs to add on for luggage, puts same ballpark
Something been weird about London/Edinburgh pricing since covid to me.
- S/Lt_Phillips
- Posts: 593
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:31 pm
Completely agree wrt aviation - VAT on tickets or fuel, and/or some kind of frequently flyer/business class levy too. But public opinion would be massively against it (fits in with the "Climate Change why don't we care thread"), everyone needs their cheap holiday in the sun.Biffer wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 9:28 am Problem is we’re not prepared to invest in these. We have to raise tens of billions to improve rail infrastructure and that’s going to be public money.
How do you convince people to do that? The private sector has had thirty years of access and haven’t.
North to Aberdeen and Inverness we need a line that doesn’t stop at every house, in other words a line direct from Dunfermline to Perth via Kinross. And more dual line sections north of Perth for Inverness.
WRT price, we need to stop subsidising airlines and put tax on aviation fuel. But we can’t do that in isolation.
A train line from Dunfermline to Perth would be very helpful, but unfortunately they built the M90 past Glenfarg over the route of the old line, so it would be a nightmare to reinstate.
For trips to Aberdeen (in-laws live up that way) we've been using the Ember bus quite a bit - cheaper than the train and less stressful than driving. And the wifi works. And it's electric.
Left hand down a bit
-
- Posts: 3398
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:37 am
Would a tax on aviation fuel /levy for purely UK internal flights be viable, as a UK unilateral measure? I'm sure I've heard it suggested before. It wouldn't even need to be that onerous, just enough to tip balance towards train, especially if it subsidised train investment for a better and ideally cheaper service.S/Lt_Phillips wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 9:40 amCompletely agree wrt aviation - VAT on tickets or fuel, and/or some kind of frequently flyer/business class levy too. But public opinion would be massively against it (fits in with the "Climate Change why don't we care thread"), everyone needs their cheap holiday in the sun.Biffer wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 9:28 am Problem is we’re not prepared to invest in these. We have to raise tens of billions to improve rail infrastructure and that’s going to be public money.
How do you convince people to do that? The private sector has had thirty years of access and haven’t.
North to Aberdeen and Inverness we need a line that doesn’t stop at every house, in other words a line direct from Dunfermline to Perth via Kinross. And more dual line sections north of Perth for Inverness.
WRT price, we need to stop subsidising airlines and put tax on aviation fuel. But we can’t do that in isolation.
A train line from Dunfermline to Perth would be very helpful, but unfortunately they built the M90 past Glenfarg over the route of the old line, so it would be a nightmare to reinstate.
For trips to Aberdeen (in-laws live up that way) we've been using the Ember bus quite a bit - cheaper than the train and less stressful than driving. And the wifi works. And it's electric.
It would make sense to address internal-only flights differently to anything international, as there is a clear alternative for UK internal which isn't always the case for international - ignoring whether international travel is always actually necessary. It's also more within the gift of the UK government, which isn't the case internationally. No point taxing London-JFK if people just go Paris-JFK instead.
International air travel is here to stay for the foreseeable, I'm afraid, unless we are happy to curtail people's choice to travel which is a very, very difficult sell. I've mentioned before but I wanted to go to Norway and fancied a ferry, only to find out the route was cut a few years back. There is no reasonable alternative to flying.
I had no idea there was no trainline from Dunfermline to Perth - I've not yet had call to try to travel by train that way. That just seems madness. I've not gone up to Aberdeen but I used to have to head to Dundee for work by train, so I feel Slick's pain.
-
- Posts: 3398
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:37 am
I've also just had a squiz at that Ember bus as it's a new one on me - looks a bargain, just over £30 return to Aberdeen, and no peak fare shenanigans.S/Lt_Phillips wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 9:40 amCompletely agree wrt aviation - VAT on tickets or fuel, and/or some kind of frequently flyer/business class levy too. But public opinion would be massively against it (fits in with the "Climate Change why don't we care thread"), everyone needs their cheap holiday in the sun.Biffer wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 9:28 am Problem is we’re not prepared to invest in these. We have to raise tens of billions to improve rail infrastructure and that’s going to be public money.
How do you convince people to do that? The private sector has had thirty years of access and haven’t.
North to Aberdeen and Inverness we need a line that doesn’t stop at every house, in other words a line direct from Dunfermline to Perth via Kinross. And more dual line sections north of Perth for Inverness.
WRT price, we need to stop subsidising airlines and put tax on aviation fuel. But we can’t do that in isolation.
A train line from Dunfermline to Perth would be very helpful, but unfortunately they built the M90 past Glenfarg over the route of the old line, so it would be a nightmare to reinstate.
For trips to Aberdeen (in-laws live up that way) we've been using the Ember bus quite a bit - cheaper than the train and less stressful than driving. And the wifi works. And it's electric.
-
- Posts: 3398
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:37 am
I also noticed this:
Isn't this something that the National Rail website could have done?
https://www.theguardian.com/business/20 ... h-railwaysA new online train ticket retailer backed by the UK government is to be created, the Department for Transport (DfT) has announced, with the aim of simplifying the process of buying tickets from different rail operators.
However, the service will only be available once Great British Railways (GBR) has been established, which is not expected to take place until late 2026 at the earliest.
Isn't this something that the National Rail website could have done?
- S/Lt_Phillips
- Posts: 593
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:31 pm
Not only are Ember better value than, say Stagecoach, but they also get a thumbs up from me for some of their policies too - Mrs S/Lt P uses them to commute quite a bit, and several times they're refunded her ticket because the bus was late in to Edinburgh due to traffic (i.e. nothing they could have done about it, but they offered a refund anyway). Can you imagine airlines offering refunds for delays that were out of their control?inactionman wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 10:00 amI've also just had a squiz at that Ember bus as it's a new one on me - looks a bargain, just over £30 return to Aberdeen, and no peak fare shenanigans.S/Lt_Phillips wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 9:40 amCompletely agree wrt aviation - VAT on tickets or fuel, and/or some kind of frequently flyer/business class levy too. But public opinion would be massively against it (fits in with the "Climate Change why don't we care thread"), everyone needs their cheap holiday in the sun.Biffer wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 9:28 am Problem is we’re not prepared to invest in these. We have to raise tens of billions to improve rail infrastructure and that’s going to be public money.
How do you convince people to do that? The private sector has had thirty years of access and haven’t.
North to Aberdeen and Inverness we need a line that doesn’t stop at every house, in other words a line direct from Dunfermline to Perth via Kinross. And more dual line sections north of Perth for Inverness.
WRT price, we need to stop subsidising airlines and put tax on aviation fuel. But we can’t do that in isolation.
A train line from Dunfermline to Perth would be very helpful, but unfortunately they built the M90 past Glenfarg over the route of the old line, so it would be a nightmare to reinstate.
For trips to Aberdeen (in-laws live up that way) we've been using the Ember bus quite a bit - cheaper than the train and less stressful than driving. And the wifi works. And it's electric.
Left hand down a bit
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 6774
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
The Train Line essentially have done it, just a ludicrously fragmented system which manages to combine a lot of the worst traits of the public and private sectorsinactionman wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 10:03 am I also noticed this:
https://www.theguardian.com/business/20 ... h-railwaysA new online train ticket retailer backed by the UK government is to be created, the Department for Transport (DfT) has announced, with the aim of simplifying the process of buying tickets from different rail operators.
However, the service will only be available once Great British Railways (GBR) has been established, which is not expected to take place until late 2026 at the earliest.
Isn't this something that the National Rail website could have done?
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
Not really. They'd make sure they were filled up elsewhere.inactionman wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 9:54 amWould a tax on aviation fuel /levy for purely UK internal flights be viable, as a UK unilateral measure? I'm sure I've heard it suggested before. It wouldn't even need to be that onerous, just enough to tip balance towards train, especially if it subsidised train investment for a better and ideally cheaper service.S/Lt_Phillips wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 9:40 amCompletely agree wrt aviation - VAT on tickets or fuel, and/or some kind of frequently flyer/business class levy too. But public opinion would be massively against it (fits in with the "Climate Change why don't we care thread"), everyone needs their cheap holiday in the sun.Biffer wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 9:28 am Problem is we’re not prepared to invest in these. We have to raise tens of billions to improve rail infrastructure and that’s going to be public money.
How do you convince people to do that? The private sector has had thirty years of access and haven’t.
North to Aberdeen and Inverness we need a line that doesn’t stop at every house, in other words a line direct from Dunfermline to Perth via Kinross. And more dual line sections north of Perth for Inverness.
WRT price, we need to stop subsidising airlines and put tax on aviation fuel. But we can’t do that in isolation.
A train line from Dunfermline to Perth would be very helpful, but unfortunately they built the M90 past Glenfarg over the route of the old line, so it would be a nightmare to reinstate.
For trips to Aberdeen (in-laws live up that way) we've been using the Ember bus quite a bit - cheaper than the train and less stressful than driving. And the wifi works. And it's electric.
It would make sense to address internal-only flights differently to anything international, as there is a clear alternative for UK internal which isn't always the case for international - ignoring whether international travel is always actually necessary. It's also more within the gift of the UK government, which isn't the case internationally. No point taxing London-JFK if people just go Paris-JFK instead.
International air travel is here to stay for the foreseeable, I'm afraid, unless we are happy to curtail people's choice to travel which is a very, very difficult sell. I've mentioned before but I wanted to go to Norway and fancied a ferry, only to find out the route was cut a few years back. There is no reasonable alternative to flying.
I had no idea there was no trainline from Dunfermline to Perth - I've not yet had call to try to travel by train that way. That just seems madness. I've not gone up to Aberdeen but I used to have to head to Dundee for work by train, so I feel Slick's pain.
The French government only gave Air France/KLM money during the pandemic in return for them not flying routes that are covered by TGV.
You get from Inverkeithing to Perth on the train by heading east to Kirkcaldy, and then up to Ladybank before heading west again and up to Perth. It takes as long to get from Edinburgh to Perth on the train as it does on the bus, or longer. It's nonsense and it's one of the reasons the Inverness and Aberdeen trains take so long.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Yeah, I don't understand why we need a new online retailer when that part of the problem is already solved. It is the underlying combinations of policies and prices that are problematic.Paddington Bear wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 10:31 amThe Train Line essentially have done it, just a ludicrously fragmented system which manages to combine a lot of the worst traits of the public and private sectorsinactionman wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 10:03 am I also noticed this:
https://www.theguardian.com/business/20 ... h-railwaysA new online train ticket retailer backed by the UK government is to be created, the Department for Transport (DfT) has announced, with the aim of simplifying the process of buying tickets from different rail operators.
However, the service will only be available once Great British Railways (GBR) has been established, which is not expected to take place until late 2026 at the earliest.
Isn't this something that the National Rail website could have done?
-
- Posts: 3398
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:37 am
There's a maximum amount of fuel an aircraft can carry and land with, so they can't really hold multiple flights of fuel. If they're going Edinburgh-London they'll take on fuel in Edinburgh, even if they may have flown into Edinburgh from abroad.Biffer wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 10:54 amNot really. They'd make sure they were filled up elsewhere.inactionman wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 9:54 amWould a tax on aviation fuel /levy for purely UK internal flights be viable, as a UK unilateral measure? I'm sure I've heard it suggested before. It wouldn't even need to be that onerous, just enough to tip balance towards train, especially if it subsidised train investment for a better and ideally cheaper service.S/Lt_Phillips wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 9:40 am
Completely agree wrt aviation - VAT on tickets or fuel, and/or some kind of frequently flyer/business class levy too. But public opinion would be massively against it (fits in with the "Climate Change why don't we care thread"), everyone needs their cheap holiday in the sun.
A train line from Dunfermline to Perth would be very helpful, but unfortunately they built the M90 past Glenfarg over the route of the old line, so it would be a nightmare to reinstate.
For trips to Aberdeen (in-laws live up that way) we've been using the Ember bus quite a bit - cheaper than the train and less stressful than driving. And the wifi works. And it's electric.
It would make sense to address internal-only flights differently to anything international, as there is a clear alternative for UK internal which isn't always the case for international - ignoring whether international travel is always actually necessary. It's also more within the gift of the UK government, which isn't the case internationally. No point taxing London-JFK if people just go Paris-JFK instead.
International air travel is here to stay for the foreseeable, I'm afraid, unless we are happy to curtail people's choice to travel which is a very, very difficult sell. I've mentioned before but I wanted to go to Norway and fancied a ferry, only to find out the route was cut a few years back. There is no reasonable alternative to flying.
I had no idea there was no trainline from Dunfermline to Perth - I've not yet had call to try to travel by train that way. That just seems madness. I've not gone up to Aberdeen but I used to have to head to Dundee for work by train, so I feel Slick's pain.
The French government only gave Air France/KLM money during the pandemic in return for them not flying routes that are covered by TGV.
You get from Inverkeithing to Perth on the train by heading east to Kirkcaldy, and then up to Ladybank before heading west again and up to Perth. It takes as long to get from Edinburgh to Perth on the train as it does on the bus, or longer. It's nonsense and it's one of the reasons the Inverness and Aberdeen trains take so long.
If that proves ineffective there's little reason I can see why there isn't an airport levy on UK internal flights. Bloody Norwich 'International' made me stump up a tenner at the gate as an airport improvement levy - at least I could see the money was sorely needed - so we could do similar. Or just add to ticket price, or follow the French approach and make any commercial benefits, subsidies, considerations and all else contingent upon not competing with trains. It just feels like it's in the direct gift of the UK to do this.
It would also have the additional benefit of winding up Michael O'Leary.
The lack of direct train line from the Forth bridge to Perth is bonkers. I've had a look at the rail maps on Scotrail (can't link to images as they're pdf download) and there appears to be a route via Falkirk and Stirling, which is miles out of the way - it's really going North-East to jump on the line from Glasgow. Assume this is another impact of Beeching?
https://www.scotrail.co.uk/plan-your-journey/our-routes
-
- Posts: 3398
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:37 am
They're a private company who charge fees, and I'm never sure they get the best bang for buck - I stopped booking them when I could get better fares directly, although they were useful in planning.Paddington Bear wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 10:31 amThe Train Line essentially have done it, just a ludicrously fragmented system which manages to combine a lot of the worst traits of the public and private sectorsinactionman wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 10:03 am I also noticed this:
https://www.theguardian.com/business/20 ... h-railwaysA new online train ticket retailer backed by the UK government is to be created, the Department for Transport (DfT) has announced, with the aim of simplifying the process of buying tickets from different rail operators.
However, the service will only be available once Great British Railways (GBR) has been established, which is not expected to take place until late 2026 at the earliest.
Isn't this something that the National Rail website could have done?
I can see the need for a public service which truly looks for the lowest cost and most appropriate route and fare, but I can't see why National Rail can't do this already.
As for your broader point (as also raised by robmatic) yep, having a less mental system would actually be the most effective solution.
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 6774
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
If you’re not fussed about potentially having to move seats during a journey, use trainsplit.com. I’ve often saved 50% + off the marketed fareinactionman wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 11:24 amThey're a private company who charge fees, and I'm never sure they get the best bang for buck - I stopped booking them when I could get better fares directly, although they were useful in planning.Paddington Bear wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 10:31 amThe Train Line essentially have done it, just a ludicrously fragmented system which manages to combine a lot of the worst traits of the public and private sectorsinactionman wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 10:03 am I also noticed this:
https://www.theguardian.com/business/20 ... h-railways
Isn't this something that the National Rail website could have done?
I can see the need for a public service which truly looks for the lowest cost and most appropriate route and fare, but I can't see why National Rail can't do this already.
As for your broader point (as also raised by robmatic) yep, having a less mental system would actually be the most effective solution.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
-
- Posts: 3398
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:37 am
Paddington Bear wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 11:35 amIf you’re not fussed about potentially having to move seats during a journey, use trainsplit.com. I’ve often saved 50% + off the marketed fareinactionman wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 11:24 amThey're a private company who charge fees, and I'm never sure they get the best bang for buck - I stopped booking them when I could get better fares directly, although they were useful in planning.Paddington Bear wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 10:31 am
The Train Line essentially have done it, just a ludicrously fragmented system which manages to combine a lot of the worst traits of the public and private sectors
I can see the need for a public service which truly looks for the lowest cost and most appropriate route and fare, but I can't see why National Rail can't do this already.
As for your broader point (as also raised by robmatic) yep, having a less mental system would actually be the most effective solution.

I used that in the past, I think it was subject to some legal challenge but was judged as above-board?
Horrifically it used to work on a single train line with a single provider. In some circumstances it was cheaper to get a single from Bath to Didcot Parkway and a single from Didcot Parkway to Paddington on the exact same train than a single from Bath to Paddington. A colleague of mine was directed to leave the train at Didcot when doing this, so he walked out, along the carriage and back in. God knows what the conductor was thinking, or how we ended up with this situation. It's to do with the Bath-Didcot leg being peak time and the Didcot-London being off-peak.
What a fiasco.
? I do that trip at least 10 times a year and haven’t come close to £100 for yearsPaddington Bear wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 9:25 amI’ve never paid more than £100 return London - Edinburgh. Glasgow tends to be more expensive and of course a longer train so flying is generally the better optionBlackmac wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 9:08 amThe prices are eye watering though, unless you can book 3 months in advance. I had a last minute trip to London last year and the cheapest train was just under £300.Slick wrote: Tue Jan 21, 2025 10:41 pm
Agree again, I was just thinking more of getting business travel to London off flights
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
Yeah, Beeching, although it was never a main line.inactionman wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 11:20 amThere's a maximum amount of fuel an aircraft can carry and land with, so they can't really hold multiple flights of fuel. If they're going Edinburgh-London they'll take on fuel in Edinburgh, even if they may have flown into Edinburgh from abroad.Biffer wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 10:54 amNot really. They'd make sure they were filled up elsewhere.inactionman wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 9:54 am
Would a tax on aviation fuel /levy for purely UK internal flights be viable, as a UK unilateral measure? I'm sure I've heard it suggested before. It wouldn't even need to be that onerous, just enough to tip balance towards train, especially if it subsidised train investment for a better and ideally cheaper service.
It would make sense to address internal-only flights differently to anything international, as there is a clear alternative for UK internal which isn't always the case for international - ignoring whether international travel is always actually necessary. It's also more within the gift of the UK government, which isn't the case internationally. No point taxing London-JFK if people just go Paris-JFK instead.
International air travel is here to stay for the foreseeable, I'm afraid, unless we are happy to curtail people's choice to travel which is a very, very difficult sell. I've mentioned before but I wanted to go to Norway and fancied a ferry, only to find out the route was cut a few years back. There is no reasonable alternative to flying.
I had no idea there was no trainline from Dunfermline to Perth - I've not yet had call to try to travel by train that way. That just seems madness. I've not gone up to Aberdeen but I used to have to head to Dundee for work by train, so I feel Slick's pain.
The French government only gave Air France/KLM money during the pandemic in return for them not flying routes that are covered by TGV.
You get from Inverkeithing to Perth on the train by heading east to Kirkcaldy, and then up to Ladybank before heading west again and up to Perth. It takes as long to get from Edinburgh to Perth on the train as it does on the bus, or longer. It's nonsense and it's one of the reasons the Inverness and Aberdeen trains take so long.
If that proves ineffective there's little reason I can see why there isn't an airport levy on UK internal flights. Bloody Norwich 'International' made me stump up a tenner at the gate as an airport improvement levy - at least I could see the money was sorely needed - so we could do similar. Or just add to ticket price, or follow the French approach and make any commercial benefits, subsidies, considerations and all else contingent upon not competing with trains. It just feels like it's in the direct gift of the UK to do this.
It would also have the additional benefit of winding up Michael O'Leary.
The lack of direct train line from the Forth bridge to Perth is bonkers. I've had a look at the rail maps on Scotrail (can't link to images as they're pdf download) and there appears to be a route via Falkirk and Stirling, which is miles out of the way - it's really going North-East to jump on the line from Glasgow. Assume this is another impact of Beeching?
https://www.scotrail.co.uk/plan-your-journey/our-routes
If you think about coming out of Edinburgh Waverley, going via Fife you end up doing a giant S shape, going west to get to the bridge and then east to go to Kirkcaldy.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
It’s quite shit in 2025 and means I can’t work.
Please don’t baffle me with hotspots or suchlike
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
It’s quite shit in 2025 and means I can’t work.
Please don’t baffle me with hotspots or suchlike
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
-
- Posts: 3398
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:37 am
The Greens were going to sort it all out (well, the tortuous route to Kirkcaldy, anyway)Biffer wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 12:26 pmYeah, Beeching, although it was never a main line.inactionman wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 11:20 amThere's a maximum amount of fuel an aircraft can carry and land with, so they can't really hold multiple flights of fuel. If they're going Edinburgh-London they'll take on fuel in Edinburgh, even if they may have flown into Edinburgh from abroad.Biffer wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 10:54 am
Not really. They'd make sure they were filled up elsewhere.
The French government only gave Air France/KLM money during the pandemic in return for them not flying routes that are covered by TGV.
You get from Inverkeithing to Perth on the train by heading east to Kirkcaldy, and then up to Ladybank before heading west again and up to Perth. It takes as long to get from Edinburgh to Perth on the train as it does on the bus, or longer. It's nonsense and it's one of the reasons the Inverness and Aberdeen trains take so long.
If that proves ineffective there's little reason I can see why there isn't an airport levy on UK internal flights. Bloody Norwich 'International' made me stump up a tenner at the gate as an airport improvement levy - at least I could see the money was sorely needed - so we could do similar. Or just add to ticket price, or follow the French approach and make any commercial benefits, subsidies, considerations and all else contingent upon not competing with trains. It just feels like it's in the direct gift of the UK to do this.
It would also have the additional benefit of winding up Michael O'Leary.
The lack of direct train line from the Forth bridge to Perth is bonkers. I've had a look at the rail maps on Scotrail (can't link to images as they're pdf download) and there appears to be a route via Falkirk and Stirling, which is miles out of the way - it's really going North-East to jump on the line from Glasgow. Assume this is another impact of Beeching?
https://www.scotrail.co.uk/plan-your-journey/our-routes
If you think about coming out of Edinburgh Waverley, going via Fife you end up doing a giant S shape, going west to get to the bridge and then east to go to Kirkcaldy.
https://www.scotsman.com/news/transport ... ns-3094029Plans for a nine-mile “game changer” tunnel under the Forth have been announced by the Scottish Greens as part of a £22 billion scheme to transform the country’s rail network.
I've a mate who used to live Kirkcaldy when I lived in Leith, and it was mad it took the best part of an hour to get to his when I could see it almost from the end of my road.
inactionman wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 1:25 pm
I've a mate who used to live Kirkcaldy when I lived in Leith, and it was mad it took the best part of an hour to get to his when I could see it almost from the end of my road.
To go off-topic for a second, I was in West Lothian on Monday, right down at the water's edge and I've never seen the Forth so still - perfect mirror reflections on the water of Fife.
Same when driving back - the bridges were spectacular
I was out rowing early Saturday morning and it was like glass, coloured pink and we had a seal follow us. MagicTichtheid wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 1:33 pminactionman wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 1:25 pm
I've a mate who used to live Kirkcaldy when I lived in Leith, and it was mad it took the best part of an hour to get to his when I could see it almost from the end of my road.
To go off-topic for a second, I was in West Lothian on Monday, right down at the water's edge and I've never seen the Forth so still - perfect mirror reflections on the water of Fife.
Same when driving back - the bridges were spectacular
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
Luckily the conductor shrugged his shoulders and said it never works, so that’s all settled
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
We need water buses / hovercraft over the Forth. They manage it in Vancouver, where they get plenty of wild weather as well, so it can be done here. It's just lack of will that's the problem.inactionman wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 1:25 pmThe Greens were going to sort it all out (well, the tortuous route to Kirkcaldy, anyway)Biffer wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 12:26 pmYeah, Beeching, although it was never a main line.inactionman wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 11:20 am
There's a maximum amount of fuel an aircraft can carry and land with, so they can't really hold multiple flights of fuel. If they're going Edinburgh-London they'll take on fuel in Edinburgh, even if they may have flown into Edinburgh from abroad.
If that proves ineffective there's little reason I can see why there isn't an airport levy on UK internal flights. Bloody Norwich 'International' made me stump up a tenner at the gate as an airport improvement levy - at least I could see the money was sorely needed - so we could do similar. Or just add to ticket price, or follow the French approach and make any commercial benefits, subsidies, considerations and all else contingent upon not competing with trains. It just feels like it's in the direct gift of the UK to do this.
It would also have the additional benefit of winding up Michael O'Leary.
The lack of direct train line from the Forth bridge to Perth is bonkers. I've had a look at the rail maps on Scotrail (can't link to images as they're pdf download) and there appears to be a route via Falkirk and Stirling, which is miles out of the way - it's really going North-East to jump on the line from Glasgow. Assume this is another impact of Beeching?
https://www.scotrail.co.uk/plan-your-journey/our-routes
If you think about coming out of Edinburgh Waverley, going via Fife you end up doing a giant S shape, going west to get to the bridge and then east to go to Kirkcaldy.
https://www.scotsman.com/news/transport ... ns-3094029Plans for a nine-mile “game changer” tunnel under the Forth have been announced by the Scottish Greens as part of a £22 billion scheme to transform the country’s rail network.
I've a mate who used to live Kirkcaldy when I lived in Leith, and it was mad it took the best part of an hour to get to his when I could see it almost from the end of my road.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
I heard a rumour a couple of weeks ago that a hovercraft was being launchedBiffer wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 1:53 pmWe need water buses / hovercraft over the Forth. They manage it in Vancouver, where they get plenty of wild weather as well, so it can be done here. It's just lack of will that's the problem.inactionman wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 1:25 pmThe Greens were going to sort it all out (well, the tortuous route to Kirkcaldy, anyway)Biffer wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 12:26 pm
Yeah, Beeching, although it was never a main line.
If you think about coming out of Edinburgh Waverley, going via Fife you end up doing a giant S shape, going west to get to the bridge and then east to go to Kirkcaldy.
https://www.scotsman.com/news/transport ... ns-3094029Plans for a nine-mile “game changer” tunnel under the Forth have been announced by the Scottish Greens as part of a £22 billion scheme to transform the country’s rail network.
I've a mate who used to live Kirkcaldy when I lived in Leith, and it was mad it took the best part of an hour to get to his when I could see it almost from the end of my road.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
-
- Posts: 3398
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:37 am
Sounds hopefulSlick wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 2:09 pmI heard a rumour a couple of weeks ago that a hovercraft was being launchedBiffer wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 1:53 pmWe need water buses / hovercraft over the Forth. They manage it in Vancouver, where they get plenty of wild weather as well, so it can be done here. It's just lack of will that's the problem.inactionman wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 1:25 pm
The Greens were going to sort it all out (well, the tortuous route to Kirkcaldy, anyway)
https://www.scotsman.com/news/transport ... ns-3094029
I've a mate who used to live Kirkcaldy when I lived in Leith, and it was mad it took the best part of an hour to get to his when I could see it almost from the end of my road.
I think they trialled them about 20 years ago from Portobello, seemed like technically they were feasible. The area along by Seafield is pretty stinking so might as well drop a terminal there.
Wasn't there a ferry from Granton not all that long ago? Late 90s maybe? That would be a good idea, especially now the tram goes almost to Granton.
It is probably more feasible these days as well, now that Leith and Granton are more residential and have the tram connection to the city centre. However, Leith to Kirkcaldy is still 10 miles or so, which isn't a super quick sea journey and it might not stack up that well in comparison to the car option over the bridge. I do a similar distance to Kos for day trip/booze cruise purposes and it is about half an hour by catamaran or an hour by sea bus.Biffer wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 1:53 pmWe need water buses / hovercraft over the Forth. They manage it in Vancouver, where they get plenty of wild weather as well, so it can be done here. It's just lack of will that's the problem.inactionman wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 1:25 pmThe Greens were going to sort it all out (well, the tortuous route to Kirkcaldy, anyway)Biffer wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 12:26 pm
Yeah, Beeching, although it was never a main line.
If you think about coming out of Edinburgh Waverley, going via Fife you end up doing a giant S shape, going west to get to the bridge and then east to go to Kirkcaldy.
https://www.scotsman.com/news/transport ... ns-3094029Plans for a nine-mile “game changer” tunnel under the Forth have been announced by the Scottish Greens as part of a £22 billion scheme to transform the country’s rail network.
I've a mate who used to live Kirkcaldy when I lived in Leith, and it was mad it took the best part of an hour to get to his when I could see it almost from the end of my road.
Leith to Burntisland possibly - train station is right at the harbour and I'm sure you could get a reasonable car park somewhere nearby.robmatic wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 3:17 pmIt is probably more feasible these days as well, now that Leith and Granton are more residential and have the tram connection to the city centre. However, Leith to Kirkcaldy is still 10 miles or so, which isn't a super quick sea journey and it might not stack up that well in comparison to the car option over the bridge. I do a similar distance to Kos for day trip/booze cruise purposes and it is about half an hour by catamaran or an hour by sea bus.Biffer wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 1:53 pmWe need water buses / hovercraft over the Forth. They manage it in Vancouver, where they get plenty of wild weather as well, so it can be done here. It's just lack of will that's the problem.inactionman wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 1:25 pm
The Greens were going to sort it all out (well, the tortuous route to Kirkcaldy, anyway)
https://www.scotsman.com/news/transport ... ns-3094029
I've a mate who used to live Kirkcaldy when I lived in Leith, and it was mad it took the best part of an hour to get to his when I could see it almost from the end of my road.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Yep. Cheapest return tomorrow is £278. Cheapest return in 10 weeks time is £134.Slick wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 12:13 pm? I do that trip at least 10 times a year and haven’t come close to £100 for yearsPaddington Bear wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 9:25 amI’ve never paid more than £100 return London - Edinburgh. Glasgow tends to be more expensive and of course a longer train so flying is generally the better optionBlackmac wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 9:08 am
The prices are eye watering though, unless you can book 3 months in advance. I had a last minute trip to London last year and the cheapest train was just under £300.
- S/Lt_Phillips
- Posts: 593
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:31 pm
Speaking of ferries (no, not Calmac moaning), I think I heard somewhere that a Rosyth to Dunkirk ferry was going to start from sometime early 2025? There's something on a French website about it, but can't find anything more. Anyone in the know?
Left hand down a bit
I’m told those of us in the central belt will get an emergency broadcast on module phones this evening about 1800, because of the red weather warning.
Having had one of these in the USA this year, telling us there was a tornado coming and to seek immediate shelter, they can scare the shit out of you.
Having had one of these in the USA this year, telling us there was a tornado coming and to seek immediate shelter, they can scare the shit out of you.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
It had better live up to itBiffer wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 5:21 pm I’m told those of us in the central belt will get an emergency broadcast on module phones this evening about 1800, because of the red weather warning.
Having had one of these in the USA this year, telling us there was a tornado coming and to seek immediate shelter, they can scare the shit out of you.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
The forecast wind levels are higher than for Bawbag and the bigger one the following year.Slick wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 5:28 pmIt had better live up to itBiffer wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 5:21 pm I’m told those of us in the central belt will get an emergency broadcast on module phones this evening about 1800, because of the red weather warning.
Having had one of these in the USA this year, telling us there was a tornado coming and to seek immediate shelter, they can scare the shit out of you.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
-
- Posts: 3398
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:37 am
They reckon it'll top 80mph in Edinburgh, so expecting our garden is going to be quite signifncalty re-arranged. We had a hefty tree branch down over summer, hoping we don't get a repeat of that.
-
- Posts: 3398
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:37 am
Just got it.Biffer wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 5:21 pm I’m told those of us in the central belt will get an emergency broadcast on module phones this evening about 1800, because of the red weather warning.
Having had one of these in the USA this year, telling us there was a tornado coming and to seek immediate shelter, they can scare the shit out of you.
Very rudely interrupted a zoom meet I was on
Well that scared the shit out of me!Biffer wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 5:21 pm I’m told those of us in the central belt will get an emergency broadcast on module phones this evening about 1800, because of the red weather warning.
Having had one of these in the USA this year, telling us there was a tornado coming and to seek immediate shelter, they can scare the shit out of you.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
I remember getting sent home from the office for that big one and thinking it was a bit exaggerated - and then almost getting blown off my feet walking home through sheltered Canonmills.Biffer wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 5:29 pmThe forecast wind levels are higher than for Bawbag and the bigger one the following year.Slick wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 5:28 pmIt had better live up to itBiffer wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 5:21 pm I’m told those of us in the central belt will get an emergency broadcast on module phones this evening about 1800, because of the red weather warning.
Having had one of these in the USA this year, telling us there was a tornado coming and to seek immediate shelter, they can scare the shit out of you.