Shanky’s mate wrote: Sun Oct 18, 2020 8:16 am
I get the same disturbing feeling I’ve been getting for the last few years...
Individual talent is overcoming poor structure. Why do we persist in box kicks off the back of hard win ball? Smith kicks possession away nearly all the time. Who actually does take the kicks? When the game got frantic either side of half time structure went out the window and what looked like luck and determination carried us through.
It’s good to walk away with a win and better form from key players but I actually agree with not couch here and think the result papers over the cracks.
There is truth in this.
Our 1st half was only average, as was our final 20 minutes. We executed one good 20 minute period just after halftime that ultimately won us the match, but overall we were not particularly great or much better than what is a very average Wallaby team on paper.
Overall, my quick take on the match:
Positives;
- Caleb Clarke: Was sensational. The best debut for years. he's an excitement machine and deserves to be considered our first choice no.11 into the future.
- Backrow: Today showed me that our current backrow could work. It's balanced. Frizell is a big body for hit ups, mauling and the lineout. Savea is a great ball runner and threat at the breakdown and Cane is a tackling machine (Savea had more tackles than him this week). If this is the trio foster wants moving forward I would implore him to keep selecting them as our starting backrow for the next two years. No more rotation!
- Dual Playmaker setup: This was the best I've seen Mo'unga and Barrett combine. BB played a more typical fullback role, finding space for himself on the edge and creating opportunities for his outside backs. Mo'unga was used exclusively at first reciever, and clearly enjoyed the opportunity to lead the team around. It's no surprise that with Barrett playing a more conventional 15 role, both players excelled.
- Tupou Vaa'i: I thought the young lock really stood up today and was good at the set piece, and both defensively and with ball in hand. He is a hard working, tight playing lock. I watched him very closely today and he plays like a White Brad Thorn.
Negatives;
- Our halfbacks: Increasingly they are slowing us down at the breakdown, for seemingly very little benefit. It's almost like they just like the attention. They pause our entire attacking momentum, only to simply throw the ball to the first receiver in a conventional manner or execute a very shallow, aimless box kick. There are loads of exciting young 9's emerging in NZ and I have a feeling that neither Smith or Perenara will be in our match day XXIII come RWC 2023.
- Our kicking game: It's still shit. Shallow box kicks form our halfbacks seem to be our first choice option anywhere in our own half. I'm not sure what the point of these kicks are? Because in the last two tests I can't remember anyone contesting these with intent to win the ball back for the AB's. The point of a high, shallow box kick is to win back possession; can someone please let our coaching team know this?
In terms of attacking kicks, it seems that the high cross kick for a winger, which Richie Mo'unga uses on a regular basis for the Crusaders, has been put back on the shelf. This is a shame because this tactics keeps defenses spread, and Jordie Barrett would potentially be a great target. I hope Foster isn't ignoring this tactic because it's something that Scott Robertson employs regularly.
- Right wing: I'm still not convinced that Jordie Barrett is the right options at 14. He looks like he's playing out of position. He lacks speed and acceleration, and these are a serious problem for a winger. He also aren't using his two strongest assets, his long general kicking game and his ariel skills. I think more attacking options, like Reecs or Will Jordan, would be better options on our Right Wing.