fishfoodie wrote: ↑Mon Nov 14, 2022 2:35 pmIt's just confusing because the two Countries are different.Wrinkles wrote: ↑Mon Nov 14, 2022 2:21 pmSo, the UK death rate of 2,855 per million would’ve doubled and the Swedish rate of 2,058 would’ve halved if each country had followed the other’s policies? Something doesn’t add-up.yermum wrote: ↑Mon Nov 14, 2022 2:13 pm https://www.zmescience.com/other/pieces ... idnt-work/
So all the folk who said that the UK should have followed Sweden were wrong. The UK death rate would have doubled
As the article says, Sweden is a sparsely populated Country, so it's death rate should be considerably lower than a densely populated Country like the UK. So if Sweden had adopted even the most basic of measures, it could have halved it's death rate.
By the same token; if the UK had not gone into lockdown when infections started to run out of control; the health system in cities would have been overwhelmed, & the death rate would have been terrifying.
Yeah, perhaps Scotland is a better comparison than the UK as a whole -
137.6 (death rate per 100,000 who died within 28 days of the first positive test)
177.7 (death rate per 100,000 whose death certificate mentioned COVID-19)