Law question- Farrell tackle
-
- Posts: 2097
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:04 pm
We should reject the premise Farrell was even making a tackle, that's a shoulder charge, an assault even, but it's not a tackle.
- clydecloggie
- Posts: 1200
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:31 am
I'm so so sorry and can any Aussie lawyers with jobs on WR panels please get the feck out of NPR. It was a joke. A joke. Not some alternative truth wanker crap to actually base serious decisions on. Thank you.clydecloggie wrote: ↑Mon Aug 14, 2023 11:56 amRepeat offender, no deduction for tackle school, no mitigation - it should be 6 weeks, i.e. 2 warm-ups plus the entire pool phase of the RWC.
They'll find mitigation in George pushing Basham into Farrell's path, Farrell wasn't actually planning to tackle and just braced for the collision.
Verdict: 3 weeks.
I thought they would fudge this in the same way they did with Sexton and Zander Fagerson, but that with Farrell’s previous he’d still have to sit out a match or two. Well, they’ve excelled themselves. I didn’t even know that rescinding the red card entirely was an option on the table. I’ve certainly never heard of it happening before.LoveOfTheGame wrote: ↑Tue Aug 15, 2023 2:12 pm It really is a sad day for rugby. Atrocious decision.
Having watched the video… just wow.
It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.
- LoveOfTheGame
- Posts: 747
- Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2022 11:50 am
They absolutely should appeal this decision, for all the right and correct reasons. But they probably won't, leaving all of us in bewilderment.
- Margin__Walker
- Posts: 2744
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:47 am
I've seen red cards rescinded before by the panel.Yr Alban wrote: ↑Tue Aug 15, 2023 2:48 pmI thought they would fudge this in the same way they did with Sexton and Zander Fagerson, but that with Farrell’s previous he’d still have to sit out a match or two. Well, they’ve excelled themselves. I didn’t even know that rescinding the red card entirely was an option on the table. I’ve certainly never heard of it happening before.LoveOfTheGame wrote: ↑Tue Aug 15, 2023 2:12 pm It really is a sad day for rugby. Atrocious decision.
Having watched the video… just wow.
Nothing with one as bang to rights as that though.
It is quite something. I’m trying to recall how long Fagerson got for the RC that cost us the game v Wales, and potentially the 6N title. It was a brainless and unnecessary charge into a ruck, but it was still way less worthy of a RC than this. He’s completely upright and launching upwards. How was it ever going to be legal?Margin__Walker wrote: ↑Tue Aug 15, 2023 2:52 pmI've seen red cards rescinded before by the panel.Yr Alban wrote: ↑Tue Aug 15, 2023 2:48 pmI thought they would fudge this in the same way they did with Sexton and Zander Fagerson, but that with Farrell’s previous he’d still have to sit out a match or two. Well, they’ve excelled themselves. I didn’t even know that rescinding the red card entirely was an option on the table. I’ve certainly never heard of it happening before.LoveOfTheGame wrote: ↑Tue Aug 15, 2023 2:12 pm It really is a sad day for rugby. Atrocious decision.
Having watched the video… just wow.
Nothing with one as bang to rights as that though.
It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8223
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
I'm sure Ireland can dig up some headhunter from the lower divisions, who would be thrilled at at the prospect to administering a little mob justice, for their one & only cap
..
..
..
Or we could just play Bundee ?
..
..
..
Or we could just play Bundee ?
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5389
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
oh...Insane_Homer wrote: ↑Sun Aug 13, 2023 8:17 am At the hearing it will be found that it was entirely the welshies fault for being near Farrell (they should know by now what he's like) and not doing enough to avoid getting hit on the head.
Farrell will get an apology from ref, tmo & the welshie and ordered to pay Farrell compensation for grave injustice of it all.
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
- Hal Jordan
- Posts: 4154
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:48 pm
- Location: Sector 2814
George Ford on 5Live:
Ford: “It’s great for us in terms of having our captain and leader back in, and getting away with… (breath) obviously going through the process and cracking on as normal.”
Just listened to that, it's cracking on audioHal Jordan wrote: ↑Tue Aug 15, 2023 3:44 pm George Ford on 5Live:
Ford: “It’s great for us in terms of having our captain and leader back in, and getting away with… (breath) obviously going through the process and cracking on as normal.”
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
-
- Posts: 8665
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am
Indeed. This ruling is flying in the face of established precedent.Rhubarb & Custard wrote: ↑Tue Aug 15, 2023 2:38 pm We should reject the premise Farrell was even making a tackle, that's a shoulder charge, an assault even, but it's not a tackle.
I’m not entirely convinced that Farrell’s dad would pick someone to deliberately injure him, but you never knowfishfoodie wrote: ↑Tue Aug 15, 2023 3:07 pm I'm sure Ireland can dig up some headhunter from the lower divisions, who would be thrilled at at the prospect to administering a little mob justice, for their one & only cap
..
..
..
Or we could just play Bundee ?
Disgraceful and unbelievable decision! Farrell clearly leads with shoulder into head with his wrap arm by his side. This is clearly a 'political' decision to avoid England having to go to RWC without their captain. This unfortunately will set the standard for all tackles in the RWC and it could potentially become very messy as countries appeal decisions and use the video of the Farrell tackle as the benchmark. I honestly thought world rugby was working very hard to eradicate the high tackle but this decision sets it back 10 years! Hopefully it will be overturned.
What more can be said? Teh arm tucked and turning the shoulder into a player should be a red card in its own right, regardless of where you make contact, yet frequently goes completely unpunished. Absolute farce!
Poor Toga must be rubbing himself raw!
Poor Toga must be rubbing himself raw!
Do you have a link to that audio clip?Hal Jordan wrote: ↑Tue Aug 15, 2023 3:44 pm George Ford on 5Live:
Ford: “It’s great for us in terms of having our captain and leader back in, and getting away with… (breath) obviously going through the process and cracking on as normal.”
-
- Posts: 3586
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am
The reality is commercially rugby is circling the drain in most of its key markets and as such Sexton, Fagerson, Farrell and others are getting lighter bans than they would in another year so they play in the world cup.
That is a reason to ban Farrell unless you want your product to be turgid awful spectacle.I like neeps wrote: ↑Tue Aug 15, 2023 4:44 pm The reality is commercially rugby is circling the drain in most of its key markets and as such Sexton, Fagerson, Farrell and others are getting lighter bans than they would in another year so they play in the world cup.
-
- Posts: 2097
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:04 pm
-
- Posts: 429
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:51 pm
Has anyone of any relevance in the world of rugby condemned this decision publicly? The wider repercussions in terms of what is acceptable in contact are horrendous.
Really impressed by the reactions of English posters on this.
Really impressed by the reactions of English posters on this.
-
- Posts: 1148
- Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2020 9:31 am
So you all going to stop watching rugby as a protest?
You can now legally shoulder charge opposition players in the head, if your mate pushes them towards you, beforehand a little bit.
You can now legally shoulder charge opposition players in the head, if your mate pushes them towards you, beforehand a little bit.
- ScarfaceClaw
- Posts: 2623
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:11 pm
Hahaha. Jesus Christ. Not even Trump would be this blatant.
Notwithstanding the professionalism of the Australians on the panel, isn't this just another biased decision?
Seeing how easy England's group is, and expecting Australia to be the country that faces 2nd placed England in the QF, they just want to give Borthwick the opportunity to make England weaker by picking Farrell.
Seeing how easy England's group is, and expecting Australia to be the country that faces 2nd placed England in the QF, they just want to give Borthwick the opportunity to make England weaker by picking Farrell.
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11158
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
Are you?
Pathetic decision. The "disciplinary" committee should be charged with bringing the game into disrepute.
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11158
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
Already been donecharltom wrote: ↑Tue Aug 15, 2023 7:19 pm Notwithstanding the professionalism of the Australians on the panel, isn't this just another biased decision?
Seeing how easy England's group is, and expecting Australia to be the country that faces 2nd placed England in the QF, they just want to give Borthwick the opportunity to make England weaker by picking Farrell.
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11158
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/sport/news/to ... r-AA1fjbxf
Progressive Rugby, the campaign group that includes a number of former internationals suffering early onset dementia, described the disciplinary panel's decision as "astounding". Many other fans, ex-players and pundits have also rounded on the outcome, insisting it leaves World Rugby's player welfare policy in ruins.
Progressive Rugby's Professor John Fairclough said: “Today’s astounding decision to overturn the red given to Owen Farrell for his tackle on Taine Basham has made a mockery of World Rugby’s claim that player welfare is the game’s number one priority. Additionally, despite protestations in the judgement to the contrary, it has critically undermined the newly introduced bunker process before a global tournament and eroded confidence in the game’s judicial process which is meant to help protect those playing the game.”
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11158
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
ScarfaceClaw wrote: ↑Tue Aug 15, 2023 7:15 pm Hahaha. Jesus Christ. Not even Trump would be this blatant.
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 5963
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
Agree with Slick - this crosses a line
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
I don’t but that it’s some conspiracy to get top players to the WC to be honest. Don’t know what the hell is happening, but don’t buy thatI like neeps wrote: ↑Tue Aug 15, 2023 4:44 pm The reality is commercially rugby is circling the drain in most of its key markets and as such Sexton, Fagerson, Farrell and others are getting lighter bans than they would in another year so they play in the world cup.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
-
- Posts: 2097
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:04 pm
The email address will surely be an office one which will be up on their website. But it is a bit weird, is the argument here 'bad' people don't deserve lawyers?
Why would we have a problem with someone doing their job? And why would that invite personal attacks?
Why would we have a problem with someone doing their job? And why would that invite personal attacks?