It’s a matter of time until we do and there’s no disgrace to it anymore. They won two and should have won a third last year.Raggs wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 11:03 amI'll always be optimistic about England, but everything quoted is very realistic, we're getting closer and closer to Italy's first victory over England, could easily be this time.Lobby wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 10:54 amMy feeling too. Only variable I can see is if Italy are able to reproduce and/or better their performances from last year, when they beat Wales and Scotland and were denied victory against France by a questionable refereeing decision.sockwithaticket wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2025 4:02 pm It'll finish up:
France
Ireland
Scotland
England
Italy
Wales
2025 6N thread
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 6650
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
Yep, given their recent results, it's really not going to be any sort of a shock if they beat us now, well earned and expected.Paddington Bear wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 11:09 amIt’s a matter of time until we do and there’s no disgrace to it anymore. They won two and should have won a third last year.Raggs wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 11:03 amI'll always be optimistic about England, but everything quoted is very realistic, we're getting closer and closer to Italy's first victory over England, could easily be this time.Lobby wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 10:54 am
My feeling too. Only variable I can see is if Italy are able to reproduce and/or better their performances from last year, when they beat Wales and Scotland and were denied victory against France by a questionable refereeing decision.
Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 6650
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
They were what 10 points up against us last year? It’s a mental thing as much as anything now. It’s why our schedule is so scary, it could theoretically go very right but equally it could unravel very fastRaggs wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 11:23 amYep, given their recent results, it's really not going to be any sort of a shock if they beat us now, well earned and expected.Paddington Bear wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 11:09 amIt’s a matter of time until we do and there’s no disgrace to it anymore. They won two and should have won a third last year.Raggs wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 11:03 am
I'll always be optimistic about England, but everything quoted is very realistic, we're getting closer and closer to Italy's first victory over England, could easily be this time.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
Lowe has one v New Zealand, 1 v France. Apart from that none of his tries count according to Fester. VdM has one v Ireland, three v France , one v Aus and two v the RGsS/Lt_Phillips wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 9:32 amWe're not counting the one he has against Ireland or the four against France then? Okay. Another two against Argentina, and one against Australia, together with the six vs England (yes, we all like to laugh at England, but their ranking is pretty close to Scotland). Granted no tries against SA or NZ (don't think he's ever played against them?). But not bad against the top 8 ranked nations, would you agree?Uncle fester wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 8:21 amHe's good at getting tries against Georgia, England and Fiji yes.Tichtheid wrote: Tue Jan 21, 2025 10:28 pm
Duhan - 44 games for Scotland, 30 tries
James Lowe - 36 games for Ireland, 16 tries
Mack Hansen - 25 games for Ireland, 12 tries
Ireland are far more successful than Scotland
vdM is a proper winger alright
Notable lack of tries against teams that matter.
Not interested in your whataboutism.
Maybe check some facts next time.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Uncle fester wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 8:21 amHe's good at getting tries against Georgia, England and Fiji yes.Tichtheid wrote: Tue Jan 21, 2025 10:28 pm
Duhan - 44 games for Scotland, 30 tries
James Lowe - 36 games for Ireland, 16 tries
Mack Hansen - 25 games for Ireland, 12 tries
Ireland are far more successful than Scotland
vdM is a proper winger alright
Notable lack of tries against teams that matter.
Not interested in your whataboutism.
Oh but you are, or you wouldn't have bothered with your factually incorrect reply.
Yer man Farrell will likely select Duhan on the wing for the Lions as did Gatland before him. I think we can say he's a proper winger.
I did warn youSlick wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 8:43 amWeird argument to be getting into FesterUncle fester wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 8:21 amHe's good at getting tries against Georgia, England and Fiji yes.Tichtheid wrote: Tue Jan 21, 2025 10:28 pm
Duhan - 44 games for Scotland, 30 tries
James Lowe - 36 games for Ireland, 16 tries
Mack Hansen - 25 games for Ireland, 12 tries
Ireland are far more successful than Scotland
vdM is a proper winger alright
Notable lack of tries against teams that matter.
Not interested in your whataboutism.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
- Uncle fester
- Posts: 4919
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm
I remember at the time commenting that while I wasn't a huge fan of VDM, if you were going to pick him, you needed to be putting the ball in his hands but instead Gatland picked him in a game plan that saw the ball in the air the whole time.Tichtheid wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 1:02 pmUncle fester wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 8:21 amHe's good at getting tries against Georgia, England and Fiji yes.Tichtheid wrote: Tue Jan 21, 2025 10:28 pm
Duhan - 44 games for Scotland, 30 tries
James Lowe - 36 games for Ireland, 16 tries
Mack Hansen - 25 games for Ireland, 12 tries
Ireland are far more successful than Scotland
vdM is a proper winger alright
Notable lack of tries against teams that matter.
Not interested in your whataboutism.
Oh but you are, or you wouldn't have bothered with your factually incorrect reply.
Yer man Farrell will likely select Duhan on the wing for the Lions as did Gatland before him. I think we can say he's a proper winger.
So yeah, he's scored one try against Ireland in how many games? He's a highlights reel player that better teams can limit easily.
- Uncle fester
- Posts: 4919
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm
Last autumn against South AfricaS/Lt_Phillips wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 9:32 amWe're not counting the one he has against Ireland or the four against France then? Okay. Another two against Argentina, and one against Australia, together with the six vs England (yes, we all like to laugh at England, but their ranking is pretty close to Scotland). Granted no tries against SA or NZ (don't think he's ever played against them?). But not bad against the top 8 ranked nations, would you agree?Uncle fester wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 8:21 amHe's good at getting tries against Georgia, England and Fiji yes.Tichtheid wrote: Tue Jan 21, 2025 10:28 pm
Duhan - 44 games for Scotland, 30 tries
James Lowe - 36 games for Ireland, 16 tries
Mack Hansen - 25 games for Ireland, 12 tries
Ireland are far more successful than Scotland
vdM is a proper winger alright
Notable lack of tries against teams that matter.
Not interested in your whataboutism.
Maybe check some facts next time.
0 tries
2023 rwc v south africa
0 tries
2021 November v south africa
0 tries
Maybe it's you who needs to check some facts?
Last edited by Uncle fester on Wed Jan 22, 2025 7:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 3398
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:37 am
Despite him making a slipshod England look like mugs, there are Scottish wings (even Edinburgh wings - stand up Darcy Graham) who I think are more natural rugby players, are more intuitive, and who show more complete sets of skills.Uncle fester wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 3:24 pmI remember at the time commenting that while I wasn't a huge fan of VDM, if you were going to pick him, you needed to be putting the ball in his hands but instead Gatland picked him in a game plan that saw the ball in the air the whole time.Tichtheid wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 1:02 pmUncle fester wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 8:21 am
He's good at getting tries against Georgia, England and Fiji yes.
Notable lack of tries against teams that matter.
Not interested in your whataboutism.
Oh but you are, or you wouldn't have bothered with your factually incorrect reply.
Yer man Farrell will likely select Duhan on the wing for the Lions as did Gatland before him. I think we can say he's a proper winger.
So yeah, he's scored one try against Ireland in how many games? He's a highlights reel player that better teams can limit easily.
He's in no way a poor player, but I agree that he does need someone else to do a lot of directing and creating his opportunities. He's pretty bloody good at finishing them though, which is what his record attests (again, with England buffing his numbers up) and which is nine tenths of what you want in a winger.
I'd still rather watch Darcy Graham though.
Well, a fact would be VdM scoring in the RWC 2023 game v Tonga. So you're just talking out of your arse.Uncle fester wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 3:29 pmLast autumn against South AfricaS/Lt_Phillips wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 9:32 amWe're not counting the one he has against Ireland or the four against France then? Okay. Another two against Argentina, and one against Australia, together with the six vs England (yes, we all like to laugh at England, but their ranking is pretty close to Scotland). Granted no tries against SA or NZ (don't think he's ever played against them?). But not bad against the top 8 ranked nations, would you agree?Uncle fester wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 8:21 am
He's good at getting tries against Georgia, England and Fiji yes.
Notable lack of tries against teams that matter.
Not interested in your whataboutism.
Maybe check some facts next time.
0 tries
2023 rwc
0 tries
2021 November
0 tries
Maybe it's you who needs to check some facts?
Tries scored by James Lowe in Autumn Internationals 2024 - 0
Tries scored by James Lowe in Autumn Internationals 2022 - 0
Tries scored by James Lowe in Autumn Internationals 2021 - 0
Van der Merwe scored more tries than Lowe and Hansen added together last year.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
- Uncle fester
- Posts: 4919
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm
I was referring to games against South Africa when the previous poster wondered if VDM had ever played against them with Scotland. Post edited to clarify.Biffer wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 4:06 pmWell, a fact would be VdM scoring in the RWC 2023 game v Tonga. So you're just talking out of your arse.Uncle fester wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 3:29 pmLast autumn against South AfricaS/Lt_Phillips wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 9:32 am
We're not counting the one he has against Ireland or the four against France then? Okay. Another two against Argentina, and one against Australia, together with the six vs England (yes, we all like to laugh at England, but their ranking is pretty close to Scotland). Granted no tries against SA or NZ (don't think he's ever played against them?). But not bad against the top 8 ranked nations, would you agree?
Maybe check some facts next time.
0 tries
2023 rwc
0 tries
2021 November
0 tries
Maybe it's you who needs to check some facts?
Tries scored by James Lowe in Autumn Internationals 2024 - 0
Tries scored by James Lowe in Autumn Internationals 2022 - 0
Tries scored by James Lowe in Autumn Internationals 2021 - 0
Van der Merwe scored more tries than Lowe and Hansen added together last year.
Also 3 lions tests against SA.
0 tries
I don't get the urge to compare him with Hansen and Lowe as a debating tactic. I certainly wouldn't be picking them on a world xv. If we had better players, we'd pick them. If they were better, they'd have played with their country of birth, a bit like VDM.
Poster up further points out that Graham is a better rugby player and that shows at elite test level.
- S/Lt_Phillips
- Posts: 589
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:31 pm
I was referring to NZ. Don't think he's played against them. Other than that, all the facts were checked. But thanks for your feedback.Uncle fester wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 7:31 pmI was referring to games against South Africa when the previous poster wondered if VDM had ever played against them with Scotland. Post edited to clarify.Biffer wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 4:06 pmWell, a fact would be VdM scoring in the RWC 2023 game v Tonga. So you're just talking out of your arse.Uncle fester wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 3:29 pm
Last autumn against South Africa
0 tries
2023 rwc
0 tries
2021 November
0 tries
Maybe it's you who needs to check some facts?
Tries scored by James Lowe in Autumn Internationals 2024 - 0
Tries scored by James Lowe in Autumn Internationals 2022 - 0
Tries scored by James Lowe in Autumn Internationals 2021 - 0
Van der Merwe scored more tries than Lowe and Hansen added together last year.
Also 3 lions tests against SA.
0 tries
I don't get the urge to compare him with Hansen and Lowe as a debating tactic. I certainly wouldn't be picking them on a world xv. If we had better players, we'd pick them. If they were better, they'd have played with their country of birth, a bit like VDM.
Poster up further points out that Graham is a better rugby player and that shows at elite test level.
Left hand down a bit
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8729
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
Everyone seems to be forgetting that Faz isn't going to be selecting & deciding on the tactics for this years 6N; it'll be Easterbunnies choices !
Now some people may say that, well of course Faz will still be making the decisions in the background, but that wouldn't be my reading of his character; for me he'll chat with EB & discuss things, but then he'll delegate the real decisions to the man on the ground.
It'll be interesting to see how this plays out !
Now some people may say that, well of course Faz will still be making the decisions in the background, but that wouldn't be my reading of his character; for me he'll chat with EB & discuss things, but then he'll delegate the real decisions to the man on the ground.
It'll be interesting to see how this plays out !
Shall we have a little competition - Just pick winning side and margin. Bonus -05 for correct guess.
Lowest score wins
Keen?
I'll start
France Vs Wales - France by 21
Scotland Vs Italy - Scotland by 15
Ireland Vs England - Ireland by 15
Lowest score wins
Keen?
I'll start
France Vs Wales - France by 21
Scotland Vs Italy - Scotland by 15
Ireland Vs England - Ireland by 15
I drink and I forget things.
- Guy Smiley
- Posts: 6636
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:52 pm
https://www.world.rugby/news/927370/sim ... ns-in-2024Biffer wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 6:44 am Six Nations to use twenty minute red cards.
I really don't like this.
Key principles
The on-field process remains the same: Referees can still give a straight red card and the ‘Bunker’ can be called upon for matters that meet the yellow card threshold, reflecting a commitment to ensuring the right outcome and deterring foul play.
A red card still means a red card: This means that after 20 minutes, the offending team will be able to replace the red-carded player with one of their available replacements, leading to more jeopardy and a better contest on the day. The punishment is focused on the offending player, not the game.
Bans will mean what they say: Players sent off for dangerous foul play will be banned for longer via an automatic sanctioning process (no hearing). There will be no mitigation applied without an appeal.
Welfare remains non-negotiable: While tackle technique has shifted significantly given both welfare and performance dynamics, the off-field sanction process will continue to act as a strong deterrent to players, while education on tackle technique as a performance enabler will be stepped up.
I don’t like it either. I could ‘get it’ if it made refs less reluctant to issue red cards, but I haven’t seen much to suggest that’s the case.Biffer wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 6:44 am Six Nations to use twenty minute red cards.
I really don't like this.
Yeah, I understand how it works. I just don't like it.Guy Smiley wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 7:09 amhttps://www.world.rugby/news/927370/sim ... ns-in-2024Biffer wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 6:44 am Six Nations to use twenty minute red cards.
I really don't like this.
Key principles
The on-field process remains the same: Referees can still give a straight red card and the ‘Bunker’ can be called upon for matters that meet the yellow card threshold, reflecting a commitment to ensuring the right outcome and deterring foul play.
A red card still means a red card: This means that after 20 minutes, the offending team will be able to replace the red-carded player with one of their available replacements, leading to more jeopardy and a better contest on the day. The punishment is focused on the offending player, not the game.
Bans will mean what they say: Players sent off for dangerous foul play will be banned for longer via an automatic sanctioning process (no hearing). There will be no mitigation applied without an appeal.
Welfare remains non-negotiable: While tackle technique has shifted significantly given both welfare and performance dynamics, the off-field sanction process will continue to act as a strong deterrent to players, while education on tackle technique as a performance enabler will be stepped up.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
-
- Posts: 3398
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:37 am
I quite like the bolded bit.Guy Smiley wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 7:09 amhttps://www.world.rugby/news/927370/sim ... ns-in-2024Biffer wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 6:44 am Six Nations to use twenty minute red cards.
I really don't like this.
Key principles
The on-field process remains the same: Referees can still give a straight red card and the ‘Bunker’ can be called upon for matters that meet the yellow card threshold, reflecting a commitment to ensuring the right outcome and deterring foul play.
A red card still means a red card: This means that after 20 minutes, the offending team will be able to replace the red-carded player with one of their available replacements, leading to more jeopardy and a better contest on the day. The punishment is focused on the offending player, not the game.
Bans will mean what they say: Players sent off for dangerous foul play will be banned for longer via an automatic sanctioning process (no hearing). There will be no mitigation applied without an appeal.
Welfare remains non-negotiable: While tackle technique has shifted significantly given both welfare and performance dynamics, the off-field sanction process will continue to act as a strong deterrent to players, while education on tackle technique as a performance enabler will be stepped up.
Make the sanctions automatic, and make it the responsibility of the sanctioned player to argue why they deserve any mitigation.
We still need some way of appealing, for example the Steward red card nonsense vs Ireland, but we shouldn't let players off for dangerous play because they said the right things in the panel.
- S/Lt_Phillips
- Posts: 589
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:31 pm
Definitely the bolded bit, agree with the no automatic mitigation.inactionman wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 9:12 amI quite like the bolded bit.Guy Smiley wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 7:09 amhttps://www.world.rugby/news/927370/sim ... ns-in-2024Biffer wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 6:44 am Six Nations to use twenty minute red cards.
I really don't like this.
Key principles
The on-field process remains the same: Referees can still give a straight red card and the ‘Bunker’ can be called upon for matters that meet the yellow card threshold, reflecting a commitment to ensuring the right outcome and deterring foul play.
A red card still means a red card: This means that after 20 minutes, the offending team will be able to replace the red-carded player with one of their available replacements, leading to more jeopardy and a better contest on the day. The punishment is focused on the offending player, not the game.
Bans will mean what they say: Players sent off for dangerous foul play will be banned for longer via an automatic sanctioning process (no hearing). There will be no mitigation applied without an appeal.
Welfare remains non-negotiable: While tackle technique has shifted significantly given both welfare and performance dynamics, the off-field sanction process will continue to act as a strong deterrent to players, while education on tackle technique as a performance enabler will be stepped up.
Make the sanctions automatic, and make it the responsibility of the sanctioned player to argue why they deserve any mitigation.
We still need some way of appealing, for example the Steward red card nonsense vs Ireland, but we shouldn't let players off for dangerous play because they said the right things in the panel.
Still don't like the 20 minute red card though. I get that they're trying to make it about the player and not ruin the match, but I don't think 20 mins impact to the team is enough.
Last edited by S/Lt_Phillips on Thu Jan 23, 2025 9:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
Left hand down a bit
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 6650
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
20 minute red has a place if there’s still an actual red used for horrendous high shots etc. No one throws punches anymore so it’s pointless pretending that’s what it’s there for
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
Paddington Bear wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 9:48 am 20 minute red has a place if there’s still an actual red used for horrendous high shots etc. No one throws punches anymore so it’s pointless pretending that’s what it’s there for
Yes, that option is still there, but I would wager that it will never be used in a match where the 20 minute card is available. It's a get-out clause after all the clamour about "games being ruined" - utter bollocks of course, there is a fairly simple way to stop games being ruined by cards, just don't fucking tackle in an upright position.
Torque mentioned Aldritt saying to a referee after an incident was let go, "Don't talk to us about player safety anymore".
It's always only been lip service anyway, as long as people watch in their droves (ie bring in advertising, sponsorship and tv money) they don't actually give a flying fuck about player welfare.
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 6650
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
Agreed. With this said every side is all ‘player safety is paramount’ until one of their players is threatened with being sent off at which point the ref is ruining the contest. None of us are totally immune from this. A red card is such a sea change in a game (hell even penalties are hence why they’re celebrated so hard) you can understand why, it doesn’t make for great sport thoughTichtheid wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 10:17 amPaddington Bear wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 9:48 am 20 minute red has a place if there’s still an actual red used for horrendous high shots etc. No one throws punches anymore so it’s pointless pretending that’s what it’s there for
Yes, that option is still there, but I would wager that it will never be used in a match where the 20 minute card is available. It's a get-out clause after all the clamour about "games being ruined" - utter bollocks of course, there is a fairly simple way to stop games being ruined by cards, just don't fucking tackle in an upright position.
Torque mentioned Aldritt saying to a referee after an incident was let go, "Don't talk to us about player safety anymore".
It's always only been lip service anyway, as long as people watch in their droves (ie bring in advertising, sponsorship and tv money) they don't actually give a flying fuck about player welfare.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
We benefited from the 20m red card v SA in November but I still don't like it. We should have gone to 14 and taken the consequences.Paddington Bear wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 10:38 amAgreed. With this said every side is all ‘player safety is paramount’ until one of their players is threatened with being sent off at which point the ref is ruining the contest. None of us are totally immune from this. A red card is such a sea change in a game (hell even penalties are hence why they’re celebrated so hard) you can understand why, it doesn’t make for great sport thoughTichtheid wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 10:17 amPaddington Bear wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 9:48 am 20 minute red has a place if there’s still an actual red used for horrendous high shots etc. No one throws punches anymore so it’s pointless pretending that’s what it’s there for
Yes, that option is still there, but I would wager that it will never be used in a match where the 20 minute card is available. It's a get-out clause after all the clamour about "games being ruined" - utter bollocks of course, there is a fairly simple way to stop games being ruined by cards, just don't fucking tackle in an upright position.
Torque mentioned Aldritt saying to a referee after an incident was let go, "Don't talk to us about player safety anymore".
It's always only been lip service anyway, as long as people watch in their droves (ie bring in advertising, sponsorship and tv money) they don't actually give a flying fuck about player welfare.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
- S/Lt_Phillips
- Posts: 589
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:31 pm
France v Wales - France by 28
Scotland v Italy - Scotland by <7
Ireland v England - Ireland by 9 (being conservative, lack of Farrell coaching a big unknown)
Scotland v Italy - Scotland by <7
Ireland v England - Ireland by 9 (being conservative, lack of Farrell coaching a big unknown)
Left hand down a bit
-
- Posts: 3398
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:37 am
France v Wales - France by 14
Scotland v Italy - Scotland by 7
Ireland v England - Ireland by 7, and a contentious red card.
Scotland v Italy - Scotland by 7
Ireland v England - Ireland by 7, and a contentious red card.
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 6650
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
France by 30
England by 5
Italy by 3
Go hard or go home
England by 5
Italy by 3
Go hard or go home
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
- Uncle fester
- Posts: 4919
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm
Do a separate thread for them and I'll dig out the excel file I made before.
I was going to - just wanted to gauge interest.
I was going to - just wanted to gauge interest.
Done!!!!Uncle fester wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 11:42 am Do a separate thread for them and I'll dig out the excel file I made before.
I hope the Excel sheet gets finished this time! I was winning last year and I had a good last round. I was waiting to be crowned. My one moment of absolute triumph in a miserable existence 

“It was a pet, not an animal. It had a name, you don't eat things with names, this is horrific!”
There's one way to be sure it gets finishedPCPhil wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 2:20 pm I hope the Excel sheet gets finished this time! I was winning last year and I had a good last round. I was waiting to be crowned. My one moment of absolute triumph in a miserable existence![]()

If it could be shared i would be happy to assist.Ovals wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 2:39 pmThere's one way to be sure it gets finishedPCPhil wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 2:20 pm I hope the Excel sheet gets finished this time! I was winning last year and I had a good last round. I was waiting to be crowned. My one moment of absolute triumph in a miserable existence![]()
![]()
“It was a pet, not an animal. It had a name, you don't eat things with names, this is horrific!”
-
- Posts: 9246
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am
Wales get rid of Alex King and bring back Rob Howley as attack coach.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-union ... 0y50r0w0eo
It's quite funny, but also desperately sad. Almost as if Gatland's conducting an experiment into how shit he make them before the WRU find their bollocks and give him the boot.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-union ... 0y50r0w0eo
It's quite funny, but also desperately sad. Almost as if Gatland's conducting an experiment into how shit he make them before the WRU find their bollocks and give him the boot.
Wonder what the odds of Howley coming back were?sockwithaticket wrote: Fri Jan 24, 2025 6:51 pm Wales get rid of Alex King and bring back Rob Howley as attack coach.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-union ... 0y50r0w0eo
It's quite funny, but also desperately sad. Almost as if Gatland's conducting an experiment into how shit he make them before the WRU find their bollocks and give him the boot.
-
- Posts: 9246
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am
Simian wrote: Fri Jan 24, 2025 6:55 pmWonder what the odds of Howley coming back were?sockwithaticket wrote: Fri Jan 24, 2025 6:51 pm Wales get rid of Alex King and bring back Rob Howley as attack coach.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-union ... 0y50r0w0eo
It's quite funny, but also desperately sad. Almost as if Gatland's conducting an experiment into how shit he make them before the WRU find their bollocks and give him the boot.

- S/Lt_Phillips
- Posts: 589
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:31 pm
But Gatland said we shouldn't underestimate Wales! Maybe the BBC were having a bit of fun when they quoted that bit.sockwithaticket wrote: Fri Jan 24, 2025 7:09 pmSimian wrote: Fri Jan 24, 2025 6:55 pmWonder what the odds of Howley coming back were?sockwithaticket wrote: Fri Jan 24, 2025 6:51 pm Wales get rid of Alex King and bring back Rob Howley as attack coach.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-union ... 0y50r0w0eo
It's quite funny, but also desperately sad. Almost as if Gatland's conducting an experiment into how shit he make them before the WRU find their bollocks and give him the boot.![]()
I actually think Wales won't quite be the soft touch we all expect them to be. Though I won't be disappointed if they lose every game by a record margin, obviously.
Left hand down a bit