Longshanks wrote: ↑Sun Nov 22, 2020 6:02 pm
fishfoodie wrote: ↑Sun Nov 22, 2020 4:28 pm
Longshanks wrote: ↑Sun Nov 22, 2020 12:49 pm
What has that got to do with the deal with Canada?
Just that the Politicians saying that a deal is the same as the old deal; doesn't mean that it actually is the same; especially when the Politicians have a track record of lying.
Lets wait for the experts to look it over, before opening the Champagne
You seem to misunderstand.
Canada have agreed to continue trading with the UK on the
same terms as with they do with the EU. There is nothing to look at as far as I can tell.
In 2 years time both sides hope to have a more ambitious FTA
But
they aren't trading on the same terms !
The terms are, broadly the same; but there are differences; & one of them is significant.
Verheul said the "small handful" of issues negotiators were stuck on in the late stages also included converting CETA's market access commitments for 28 countries into reasonable quantities for the U.K. alone. For example, CETA's quota for sensitive farm goods will remain intact for the remaining 27 states to use, so the U.K. and Canada must negotiate their own tariff-free quantities in each direction.
One is not unexpected, but odd.
Steve Verheul, the assistant deputy minister for trade negotiations, told MPs that negotiators had some "challenges" resolving issues related to the temporary entry of business people for business purposes — something that's been an issue between the U.K. and other trading partners too, as it forges its own immigration policy post-Brexit.
& the fucking bizarre obsession with cheese continues.
Forsyth told MPs he did not have a negotiating mandate to offer the U.K. an additional slice of Canada's cheese market, for example, even though the U.K. wanted it.
In the other direction, Canadian grain and livestock farmers are perennially aggressive in negotiating new markets. The U.K., now out from under the EU's protection, is a target.
Boris Johnson's Conservative government, which relies on support from rural constituencies, may have resisted more tariff-free access for things like Canadian beef and pork.
I don't want to beat the topic to death; but it shouldn't be surprising that the UK isn't able to strike trade deals that are, "
better", than what they had under the EU. For one; UK hasn't negotiated deals for itself for decades, & it's already been admitted that it doesn't have as many negotiators of stature, as it would like. And second; the EU, & others will always try to include provisions in its trade deals; that if the other Country gives more favorable access to another Country; they will have to extend that access to the EU. So it's very unlikely that anyone will give the UK a better deal, when they know they'll have to extend it to the EU too.