Dan54 wrote: Fri Nov 27, 2020 5:01 am
Ymx wrote: Thu Nov 26, 2020 7:10 pm
Plus, come on. Wayne Smith wouldn’t say otherwise.
However you may have forgotten what Henry thought when speaking honestly.
Either way, it’s a dull argument to say only certain people are allowed to give opinion and all others don’t qualify.
It doesn’t take a head coach to be able to read the score board after 80 minutes. Nor does it take an expert to note so many players playing out of their best position, seemingly to shoehorn in players.
You mean Henry who was one of the ones who appointed him? Everyone has an opinion, and certainly entitled to them, just the idea that suddenly it bad to shoehorn players in when it been done for so bloody long just shows how little time some have watched rugby.
Dan I am. (What is your issue with Being Verbs is/am/has, btw?)
Henry the one who said the process was a mess and should have been more to choose from. Which pretty blatantly tells you he’s not happy with the result.
Henry who pretty much said it should have been Rennie.
Henry the one who said the castle needs to be knocked down and rebuilt.
Henry the one who said it will be Razor, when not if.
Reading between these not so thinly veiled points, had been fairly clear it should have been Rennie followed by Razor.
Henry suggested complacency was the ABs worst enemy and that losing to England was a good thing. No, he was wrong on this occasion. Foster is the ABs worst enemy it would seem.
As for shoe-horning. Never can I recall a level as bad as it is now. Not only that, there seems to be no learning process. Here we are still with Jordie on the wing. Centres wrong way around. Back row in a complete jumble.